Fri May 1, 2020, 11:08 AM

Atticus (13,578 posts)

Could those who post clips from David Packman please label them as such.

Some may feel that giving Mr. Packman 5 minutes of face time in order to watch a 20 second video or read a few lines of transcript is worthwhile. I do not and "click off" each time I unknowingly select such a post and see his name writ bold on a black screen before he appears.

Thanks.

11 replies, 1019 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

11 replies	Author	Time	Post
Could those who post clips from David Packman please label them as such. (Original post)	Atticus	May 2020	OP
I agree and i have asked but i got the usual chorus of snarky bullsht	Fullduplexxx	May 2020	#1
Now....let's look at what was said	underpants	May 2020	#2
I agree with you. nt	tazkcmo	May 2020	#3
Yes, please.	Arkansas Granny	May 2020	#4
Agreed. Waaaay too much blah blah blah	CurtEastPoint	May 2020	#5
Yes! Less packman and more context-less references to what somebody said on cable news TV	aidbo	May 2020	#6
+1000	wcast	May 2020	#11
Thank you	wryter2000	May 2020	#7
Yes	jpak	May 2020	#8
Who is David Packman?	madinmaryland	May 2020	#9
Yes, please summarize ALL videos. They have so many trackers that I see only blank	Bernardo de La Paz	May 2020	#10

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 11:17 AM

Fullduplexxx (5,987 posts)

1. I agree and i have asked but i got the usual chorus of snarky bullsht

Reply to this post

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 11:20 AM

underpants (170,675 posts)

2. Now....let's look at what was said

Ok. Play the clip and shut up.

I hate those “my take” commentaries that offer nothing substantive

Reply to this post

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 11:25 AM

tazkcmo (7,010 posts)

3. I agree with you. nt

Reply to this post

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 11:27 AM

Arkansas Granny (30,693 posts)

4. Yes, please.

Reply to this post

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 11:34 AM

CurtEastPoint (16,609 posts)

5. Agreed. Waaaay too much blah blah blah

Reply to this post

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 11:39 AM

aidbo (2,328 posts)

6. Yes! Less packman and more context-less references to what somebody said on cable news TV

Reply to this post

Response to aidbo (Reply #6)

Fri May 1, 2020, 12:21 PM

wcast (595 posts)

11. +1000

This made me smile.

Reply to this post

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 11:55 AM

wryter2000 (43,849 posts)

7. Thank you

When I see his face, I click away. I've listened to too much of his verbiage hoping to get to what's in the title of the thread.

Reply to this post

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 11:59 AM

jpak (41,189 posts)

8. Yes

Thanks

Reply to this post

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 12:00 PM

madinmaryland (63,842 posts)

9. Who is David Packman?

Reply to this post

Response to Atticus (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2020, 12:06 PM

Bernardo de La Paz (41,970 posts)

10. Yes, please summarize ALL videos. They have so many trackers that I see only blank

... and usually have no idea what they are about or who produced them, etc.

Rarely, I am intrigued enough to turn off the protections, look at the video, and then erase the mountain of cookies that result from the fingerprinters and trackers.

If a video is any good, it is worth selling a little bit to DU members.

Reply to this post

General Discussion (Forum)