Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
142 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If this story is true... It's NOT GOOD... (Original Post) liberallibral Sep 2012 OP
The comment section has been flooded by RWers. This does not say much for the site, I guess. GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #1
Yep - I also noticed that... liberallibral Sep 2012 #3
"Consider the source" may apply here, then. GreenPartyVoter Sep 2012 #5
Agreed Aerows Sep 2012 #10
Well, considering it's the current headline on Drudge, it makes sense that conservatives are reading WillowTree Sep 2012 #130
The paper owned by the Russian mafia? Your concern is noted. nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #2
It's owned by the Russian Mafia??? liberallibral Sep 2012 #4
Check your sources Aerows Sep 2012 #8
You could change the title to something less scandal oriented n/t flamingdem Sep 2012 #13
Or not Aerows Sep 2012 #63
Yep. The real Russian Mafia...the KGB guys turned billionaires. The guys sitting in Brighton Beach? msanthrope Sep 2012 #18
Romney screwed up so badly Aerows Sep 2012 #68
Not a tabloid. Spider Jerusalem Sep 2012 #72
Whisper Campaign Aerows Sep 2012 #92
I stand with the US Aerows Sep 2012 #6
Really need more sources before coming to a conclusion. n/t cynatnite Sep 2012 #7
Some part of it has to be true, how did they know where the "safe house" was NotThisTime Sep 2012 #9
That's what worries me... liberallibral Sep 2012 #12
Sure it does........ kestrel91316 Sep 2012 #45
LOL. tabasco Sep 2012 #11
Or no thanks Aerows Sep 2012 #14
Blasphemy! Ohio Joe Sep 2012 #44
Cher Aerows Sep 2012 #55
Cholula is truly great. tabasco Sep 2012 #142
A Story Like That Doesn't Concern You?? liberallibral Sep 2012 #15
I agree. Cause for much concern. In fact, it's so concerning that my concern is feeling concerned. Warren DeMontague Sep 2012 #30
This story made you laugh out loud? You have a unique sense of humor. (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #19
No Aerows Sep 2012 #69
Terrible if true, I agree. And "The Independent" is a reputable newspaper. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #16
I'm sorry Aerows Sep 2012 #21
My guess is that if someone in the State Department had the information, Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #26
My goodness Aerows Sep 2012 #50
Who are these "senior diplomatic sources"? BarackTheVote Sep 2012 #132
Oh boy Life Long Dem Sep 2012 #42
if it's true it wouldn't only affect Hillary it would affect Obama as head of the administration WI_DEM Sep 2012 #140
There's no doubt it was planned in advance, and not a spontaneous street mob TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #17
You have to be kidding Aerows Sep 2012 #27
Where did I say it was planned by the State Dept.? I think you're overreacting TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #32
No Aerows Sep 2012 #47
Be as disdainful as you want, I don't think members of this "spontaneous" mob knew how TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #52
Yeah, and in the end, THAT would be scarier than if it were planned. renie408 Sep 2012 #57
I'm sure the State Department arranged that Aerows Sep 2012 #61
Somebody leaked info, somebody the diplomats relied upon was not TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #66
I thought Aerows Sep 2012 #71
You know, you seem to be freaking out. renie408 Sep 2012 #74
Actually Aerows Sep 2012 #76
Well, since freaking out in this case... renie408 Sep 2012 #137
That does seem to be highly plausible, unfortunately. AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #119
I disagree--unless the State Dept. or Obama himself was given TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #120
It doesn't have to be a security leak at all. What about the LOCAL guards who were guarding the Th1onein Sep 2012 #87
They would have you believe Aerows Sep 2012 #93
Slow down...they meant planned by the people who did it. Jeez...n/t renie408 Sep 2012 #48
It's too bad Aerows Sep 2012 #75
Take a deep breath...I know everyone's on edge, but truth2power Sep 2012 #88
This smells like a whisper campaign Aerows Sep 2012 #90
Just trying to clarify, here...Do you mean the idea that it wasn't spontaneous truth2power Sep 2012 #102
Smells like desperation Aerows Sep 2012 #109
I must be tired or something... truth2power Sep 2012 #123
:) Aerows Sep 2012 #124
I am indeed suspicious that a spontaneously formed mob was able TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #94
Whisper Campaign n/t Aerows Sep 2012 #97
What does that mean? I don't know what you're implying. TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #100
A whisper campaign politically Aerows Sep 2012 #104
OK. But nobody here is doing that. TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #105
No, not at all Aerows Sep 2012 #110
Well, I'm not blaming either Obama or the State Dept. Not sure who is. I saw some TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #112
This message was self-deleted by its author TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #99
I thought you might have been referring to the comments section Art_from_Ark Sep 2012 #20
"he died from smoke inhalation" ...that's right ...he was not murdered. L0oniX Sep 2012 #22
If some people attack you, start fires, causing you to die of smoke inhalation, it's still murder. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #31
If it was planned then why would they leave it to chance? L0oniX Sep 2012 #36
Maybe the fire was set so as to drive them out into the open where they could be shot? cherokeeprogressive Sep 2012 #115
I thought they set his car on fire. If it were just the smoke in the area, why would he renie408 Sep 2012 #59
Right of center news paper nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #23
"The Independent" is considered left-leaning, if anything. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #39
They are owned by a guy who used to work for the KGB. Tell me how 'independent' they are? nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #49
Exactly. As IF the KGB gave a shit about ideology. DevonRex Sep 2012 #78
But Republicans said so Aerows Sep 2012 #95
Haha. DevonRex Sep 2012 #106
Those that forget history Aerows Sep 2012 #111
If that's your argument, and Putin is ex-KGB, wouldn't they want President Obama re-elected? cherokeeprogressive Sep 2012 #122
It's the paper Robert Fisk and Patrick Cockburn report on the Middle East for muriel_volestrangler Sep 2012 #134
You are always KGB. Just like Bob Woodward will always be Naval Intelligence. Don't kid yourself-- msanthrope Sep 2012 #135
Obama didn't want to attack Iran because he didn't want the Middle East to erupt in violence.... Junkdrawer Sep 2012 #24
No offense, but youre not helping darkangel218 Sep 2012 #28
I'm not blaming Obama. I blame those who want an attack on Iran. n/t Junkdrawer Sep 2012 #35
You made it sound like youre almost happy over whats happening darkangel218 Sep 2012 #51
My take: Junkdrawer Sep 2012 #53
Frankly, I don't disagree with that. AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #121
Neither are you Aerows Sep 2012 #96
Oh wow, i really hope its not true darkangel218 Sep 2012 #25
Your concern over the concern posted is noted. nt msanthrope Sep 2012 #38
OMC!! Ya I'm like totally concerned too!!1 RandiFan1290 Sep 2012 #43
It's not acceptable here to show any concern this close to an election. Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #58
How did i show more concern than the OP?? darkangel218 Sep 2012 #62
You posted the frowny face (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #65
You gotta be kidding me!! darkangel218 Sep 2012 #67
On matters of foreign policy crises and the Russian Mafia OWNS DevonRex Sep 2012 #73
Those two Aerows Sep 2012 #101
I concur. Nt DevonRex Sep 2012 #107
KKKarl... is that you? cherokeeprogressive Sep 2012 #116
Typical hyperbole... nebenaube Sep 2012 #29
The right wing is desperately trying to facilitate an October suprise. Lint Head Sep 2012 #33
It's fucking disgusting Aerows Sep 2012 #41
In other words, the right wing is willing to commit treason in order to win. Dawson Leery Sep 2012 #64
doesn't really matter if the story is true or not. Repubs will start the drumbeat and eventually Liberal_in_LA Sep 2012 #34
This worries me as well... liberallibral Sep 2012 #40
doesn't really worry me. Nothing we can do about it. That's how the right operate Liberal_in_LA Sep 2012 #46
Bullshit article Aerows Sep 2012 #37
This sounds like a plant by Republicans. Still, I hope and pray this isn't true. I doubt it is. Honeycombe8 Sep 2012 #54
Look at it this way. If you put them on high alert and/or send troops then you look panicky. Second oviedodem Sep 2012 #56
Federal Installations Were On Alert for 9/11 Anyway AnnieBW Sep 2012 #60
I stand with my president and his SoS reflection Sep 2012 #70
Me too Aerows Sep 2012 #79
Un-named sources Mutiny In Heaven Sep 2012 #77
Exactly Aerows Sep 2012 #82
Or an ex-KGB op doing a favor for the Kremlin. Nt DevonRex Sep 2012 #83
Who are the "senior diplomatic sources"? Jennicut Sep 2012 #84
Exactly. Mutiny In Heaven Sep 2012 #86
Whisper Campaign n/t Aerows Sep 2012 #98
If your concern is real... I'd BE SHOCKED.. DCBob Sep 2012 #80
Amen. Nt DevonRex Sep 2012 #81
This is RW shit-stirring Aerows Sep 2012 #85
There's nothing there Cali_Democrat Sep 2012 #89
They Seem To Be Conflating Three Story Lines DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #129
Another thing ProSense Sep 2012 #133
Whisper Campaign Aerows Sep 2012 #91
here, more of how this is a RW slant nadinbrzezinski Sep 2012 #103
Frankly the whole thing smacks of a Cheney production. Hmm. "Obama doesn't attend briefings" meme progressivebydesign Sep 2012 #108
I agree--to reiterate what you say, I don't know who was ultimately behind the attacks, TwilightGardener Sep 2012 #113
Obama has been the best president ever, in dealing with the middle east. deaniac21 Sep 2012 #114
I am old enough to remember when trolls actually had game. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #117
Indeed! HangOnKids Sep 2012 #125
And back then, people weren't afraid to tell them Nye Bevan Sep 2012 #126
I Told Him/Her To Bend Over So He Or She Could Give Evil (Romney) An Opening DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2012 #128
lulz epically.. undergroundpanther Sep 2012 #131
"Bin Laden Determined to Attack in US." Trump THAT. WinkyDink Sep 2012 #118
Politico has the White house response. aaaaaa5a Sep 2012 #127
I'm pretty surprised by the responses in this thread. WilliamPitt Sep 2012 #136
Just sayin.....This post is the first post in the DU trashing on conservativeunderground.com Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2012 #138
It is bullcrap jsr Sep 2012 #139
Completely Unsourced... Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2012 #141
 

liberallibral

(272 posts)
3. Yep - I also noticed that...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:30 PM
Sep 2012

Saw it linked on Drudge, and that's probably why so many RW-nuts are hoohaahing on it...

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
10. Agreed
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:33 PM
Sep 2012

Also, it never hurts to apply common sense like "What is this person gaining by making an article like this?"

WillowTree

(5,350 posts)
130. Well, considering it's the current headline on Drudge, it makes sense that conservatives are reading
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:50 PM
Sep 2012
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
63. Or not
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:58 PM
Sep 2012

Because this is a blatant attempt at damage control because the Romney campaign was damaged so badly by his reckless statements.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
18. Yep. The real Russian Mafia...the KGB guys turned billionaires. The guys sitting in Brighton Beach?
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:37 PM
Sep 2012

Small potatoes.

You are quoting a British tabloid run by a guy who worked for the KGB.

Your concern is noted.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
68. Romney screwed up so badly
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:00 PM
Sep 2012

He's deploying the defense, now. If you rely upon an ex-KGB operated paper, you are on thin ice.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
72. Not a tabloid.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:09 PM
Sep 2012

It's one of the four national "quality" newspapers. The other three are the Guardian, the Times, and the Telegraph. Which of course doesn't mean it can't be wrong and it may be wrong (I'd trust the story more personally from the Guardian).

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
92. Whisper Campaign
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:45 PM
Sep 2012

to keep the race close since Romney is failing with aplomb. Anyone that reads Spider Jerusalem comics is smart enough to know this.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
6. I stand with the US
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:31 PM
Sep 2012

This article is so critical of the US it isn't even funny. I don't care if you are left or right, but this article is so harsh against the US that NO ONE should take it seriously.

NotThisTime

(3,657 posts)
9. Some part of it has to be true, how did they know where the "safe house" was
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:32 PM
Sep 2012

if there wasn't something leaked by someone.... Stevens was said to have known about the threats, they were likely ongoing. I'm assuming the truth is somewhere in the middle

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
55. Cher
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:51 PM
Sep 2012

I'm from LA. I know the folks from Avery Island that make it. It's great stuff. But if you like another hot sauce, who am I to judge? You are perfectly, and profoundly able to make your own hot sauce decisions.

Just don't blame me if you don't like the best one

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
142. Cholula is truly great.
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 10:57 PM
Sep 2012

I also love Valentina and it's half the price of Cholula.

 

liberallibral

(272 posts)
15. A Story Like That Doesn't Concern You??
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:35 PM
Sep 2012

I'm hoping it's a bunch of crap, too - but it's still concerning, no???


Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
30. I agree. Cause for much concern. In fact, it's so concerning that my concern is feeling concerned.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:41 PM
Sep 2012

Thank you for bringing these important concerns up!

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
16. Terrible if true, I agree. And "The Independent" is a reputable newspaper.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:35 PM
Sep 2012

If it turned out that Hillary was warned, and did nothing, she may have to fall on her sword. Which would be a pity, as she has done a great job at State IMO.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
21. I'm sorry
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:38 PM
Sep 2012

This is pure, unadulterated bullshit.

Do you HONESTLY think in an election season that Hillary Clinton could be aware of this and NOT stave it off at the pass?

That's lunacy.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
26. My guess is that if someone in the State Department had the information,
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:40 PM
Sep 2012

it did not make it up the chain as far as Hillary. Election season or no, I think Hillary would do the right thing. Maybe a mid-level State Department employee screwed up.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
50. My goodness
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:48 PM
Sep 2012

That has to be the finest walk back on this tripe I've seen yet in this thread.

BarackTheVote

(938 posts)
132. Who are these "senior diplomatic sources"?
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 12:26 AM
Sep 2012

I doubt any of the survivors of the consulate attack have talked to this British tabloid; and how many people would definitively know that a phone call hadn't been made? Cause that's certainly what it sounds like from the Independent "exclusive story." Or, is this an insane extrapolation of what has been going around the RW echochamber already about Obama not coming to defense meetings (which is a ridiculous, scornworthy assertion), as member Laura PourMeADrink reported:

On a 2 hr drive today, I listened to a rw radio station. Their rant was:

1. Obama doesn't attend daily security briefings. (which supposedly isn't really true)

2. If Obama DID go to the briefings (instead of playing golf) he would have known there was going to be an attack.

3. Why didn't Obama arm-up ? If he had gone to briefings, he would have known about attack and could have saved those people who were killed.

4. Ergo, Obama killed those people.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021338992#post8

So, a lie based on the compression of another lie, thus creating a super lie worthy of Ryan himself!

But even if this 48-hour warning WAS true... what was the threat that was reported? And isn't it possible that the threat was already something being planned for? It WAS 9/11, after all, and all government officials in the ME must have been on high alert already! BUT--the warning COULDN'T have been the demonstrations against Innocence of Muslims, since that only went viral over the weekend.

While I'm leaning toward Laura's interpretation of events, if I were to give The Independent a HUGE benefit of the doubt, it's possible that the "stress test" had determined that the threat reported could be defended against without further back-up, and that the consulate was already prepared for a threat such as the one reported... and then were taken off-guard by the spontaneous demonstration and by some of the Libyan guards supposedly (again, giving this story the benefit of the doubt) turning their backs due to the outrage they themselves felt about the film.

This story's really a non-starter. Way too little information for us to make a determination at best, a flat-out lie at worst, and OBVIOUSLY an irresponsible, if not libelous, headline!

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
140. if it's true it wouldn't only affect Hillary it would affect Obama as head of the administration
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 09:34 AM
Sep 2012

and could be enough to defeat him. That said, it doesn't mean this story is true.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
17. There's no doubt it was planned in advance, and not a spontaneous street mob
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:36 PM
Sep 2012

thing. The street mob may have been organized or incited to cover up the operation--but the security detail giving up right away is extremely suspicious.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
27. You have to be kidding
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:41 PM
Sep 2012

If you think this was planned by the State Department and that they "let it happen".

Good God. There are people whom are willing to mislead anyone for politics. This is the US's integrity. Apparently you don't give a shit about it as long as there isn't a Republican at the wheel.

The integrity of the US only seems to matter when it is a particular political party at the head of it, and that is disgusting.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
32. Where did I say it was planned by the State Dept.? I think you're overreacting
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:42 PM
Sep 2012

to my comment.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
52. Be as disdainful as you want, I don't think members of this "spontaneous" mob knew how
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:49 PM
Sep 2012

to access diplomats without some intelligence or planning.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
57. Yeah, and in the end, THAT would be scarier than if it were planned.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:53 PM
Sep 2012

I think it would REALLY show that we have some security issues if a spontaneous angry mob could kill a US ambassador, an intelligence officer and two Marines.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
61. I'm sure the State Department arranged that
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:56 PM
Sep 2012

You know, just to be patriots on 9/11.

The absolutely gullible portion of society will believe it though. They were terrified that Mitt Romney looked like an idiot over his comments on the tragedy and have to stir something up to take the heat off of him.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
66. Somebody leaked info, somebody the diplomats relied upon was not
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:59 PM
Sep 2012

ultimately to be trusted. I don't know why anyone would be surprised. What would be more surprising is that a bunch of supposed pissed-off street punks from the general public knew where the staff was hiding and could access them or burn them out-- I just don't buy it.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
71. I thought
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:09 PM
Sep 2012

conspiracy theories were out of line on DU.

I see you've started one of your own.

You don't buy it, because you cannot believe that the Obama Administration can possibly be innocent in this situation. They are guilty of every damn thing, but they are also inept at everything. Fucking pick a decision that doesn't involve fallacious arguments if that is the debate that you want to have.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
74. You know, you seem to be freaking out.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:12 PM
Sep 2012

You should calm down a little bit. You got yourself excited when you misread the post upstream and you haven't settled back down yet.

I just heard on NPR that the attacks in Libya were most likely planned and the work of a terrorist group. I have been hearing that all day. Why are you acting as if that is some kind of SHOCKING news or completely irrational?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
76. Actually
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:16 PM
Sep 2012

I prefer freaking out. It's a much healthier state of being for me, since it leads to rational thought.

You should try it.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
137. Well, since freaking out in this case...
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 07:59 AM
Sep 2012

made you look like a total idiot, I am not sure that is really working for you like you think it is.

You are attacking a poster because YOU misread their post. You continued to attack them based on that incorrect assumption. That actually says a WHOLE lot more about you than it does about anything or anybody else. Calling me irrational, again, says more about you than it does about me. If you want to present yourself to the world as someone who cannot accept their own mistakes and who attacks others whether you are right or wrong, be my guest. I just assume that people don't want to go around looking like ignorant assholes.

My B.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
119. That does seem to be highly plausible, unfortunately.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:03 PM
Sep 2012

This does make the adminstration look bad.....not something that could turn the election or anything, but still a little too convenient for the anti-Obama set, I think.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
120. I disagree--unless the State Dept. or Obama himself was given
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:05 PM
Sep 2012

actionable intelligence of an attack there and failed to notify the consulate, I don't know why the administration would "look bad".

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
87. It doesn't have to be a security leak at all. What about the LOCAL guards who were guarding the
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:31 PM
Sep 2012

safe house? You don't think they knew what they were guarding and who they were guarding? Come on now.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
93. They would have you believe
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:49 PM
Sep 2012

That everyone that is a guard is a dufus and not informed, when that plainly isn't true. Security requires information to keep the subject safe.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
75. It's too bad
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:15 PM
Sep 2012

That I am responding to the news as we get it.

If that's a sin, you should slow down, too

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
88. Take a deep breath...I know everyone's on edge, but
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:35 PM
Sep 2012

I have no idea how you got, from twilightgardener's post, that s/he was saying it was planned BY the state dept.

The reason I decided to butt in here is that, ever since the news first came out about the attacks, it's been suggested by some that the film was NOT the precipitating cause, that there's something else behind it. In other words, that it wasn't spontaneous.

Not to put words in twilightgardener's mouth, but perhaps that's what s/he was referring to.

Beyond that, I have no idea as to the real story. Carry on.

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
102. Just trying to clarify, here...Do you mean the idea that it wasn't spontaneous
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:05 PM
Sep 2012

is part of the whisper campaign?

Here's a thread about Rachel Maddow's show - apparently she said something about the cause of the attacks.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021339203

And here's a permalink - DUer Bullwinkle saying: "it looks like that stupid-ass movie had NOTHING to do with the Libyan consulate attack."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=1339244

I'm going to go check out the show to see what she said.

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
123. I must be tired or something...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:12 PM
Sep 2012

Also, a little gin & tonic

Here's a link of Rachel saying the reason is probably avenging the death of al Libi something. He moved up to deputy of al qaida when OBL deputy moved up to leader after OBL was killed.

I'm gonna turn-in before I fall on the floor.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#49012673

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
124. :)
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:18 PM
Sep 2012

I understand what you mean. If I don't go to bed soon after the work day I've had, I'm going to fall out, too. I want to get in an hour of playing Guild Wars 2, though LOL.

I'm a glutton for punishment, I guess.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
94. I am indeed suspicious that a spontaneously formed mob was able
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:50 PM
Sep 2012

to access officials who should have been under a good deal of security. I believe that a mob may have formed, and they were reacting to the film, but I doubt that that alone could have led to the deaths of two diplomats and two Marines. There were killers specifically targeting these Americans, and knew how to get to them. Riots and confusion make a good cover.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
104. A whisper campaign politically
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:13 PM
Sep 2012

means that you spread rumors about an opponent that cannot be verified, but you continually make reference to them. This particular rumor is that Obama engineered the attack on the Libyan embassy because he is secretly a Muslim and supports these actions. It's so stupid that only a moron would believe it, but if you push it via a Whisper Campaign of rumors, maybe somebody might believe it.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
110. No, not at all
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:31 PM
Sep 2012

They aren't going with rumors and playing off innuendos. That's not happening here AT ALL while *assuming* that the State Department and President Obama is at fault in this. Not at ALL.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
112. Well, I'm not blaming either Obama or the State Dept. Not sure who is. I saw some
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:37 PM
Sep 2012

on this thread say that it would suck if there were American intelligence failures to blame, to paraphrase--but that's about it. It's a single dubious source, no one is taking it as gospel.

Response to TwilightGardener (Reply #94)

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
20. I thought you might have been referring to the comments section
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:37 PM
Sep 2012

Quite a collection of mouth-breathers and knuckle-draggers, to say the least

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
22. "he died from smoke inhalation" ...that's right ...he was not murdered.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:38 PM
Sep 2012

They died of smoke inhalation as a result of the fires started by the crowd of attackers. The attackers could have gone in an shot them. I think that would be worse. No way is a good way to die except maybe in your sleep but I don't approve of the framing of this as murder. Can you determine that the intent of the attackers was to murder them? I don't know. It may be on the level 3rd degree murder in that they didn't plan to actually kill them. I'm not saying that they did not murder them only that the press is framing this. We don't really know for sure. I for one do not trust or government to tell the truth nor do I trust the press either.

If you don't read the paper you are uninformed and if you do reed it you are misinformed. - Sam Clemens (not an exact quote)

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
31. If some people attack you, start fires, causing you to die of smoke inhalation, it's still murder.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:42 PM
Sep 2012

Morally and legally.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
36. If it was planned then why would they leave it to chance?
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:43 PM
Sep 2012

If it was really a safe house there would be a fire proof area or room and have oxygen.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
115. Maybe the fire was set so as to drive them out into the open where they could be shot?
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:50 PM
Sep 2012

Starting a fire that kills someone ISN'T murder? Now I've heard it all.

renie408

(9,854 posts)
59. I thought they set his car on fire. If it were just the smoke in the area, why would he
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:55 PM
Sep 2012

be the only one to succumb to it?

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
23. Right of center news paper
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:39 PM
Sep 2012

and the story has been debunked by the administration, The meat of this is that the POTUS has his daily briefing in the schedule. This is true when POTUS is at the WH, not traveling.

Here, from The Note...


Congress was warned about Libya last month

The author of the report, Christopher Blanchard, specialist in Middle Eastern affairs, on Thursday told the E-Ring, "Security has deteriorated since the election [in July] and the government has not appeared able to stop attacks on religious buildings or an ongoing string of assassination attacks on former regime security officials. The attacks on the U.S. offices in Benghazi were the latest and most severe in a series of attacks on foreign diplomatic facilities and international organizations in Libya."

"This incident underscores what the State Department itself said in its late August travel warning: militia groups outside of state control are active in Libya and pose a direct threat to Libyans and foreigners."

According to Blanchard's report, which is titled Libya: Transition and U.S. Policy and dated August 9, 2012, Libyan security is severely hampered by several factors, as the country continues to emerge from civil war and moves haltingly toward unifying its governance and security institutions and ad-hoc groups.

U.S. officials and outside experts, CRS stated, already harbored significant concerns over loose security at the country's borders and "hundreds of suspected weapons sites," in addition to massive proliferation of small arms, shoulder-fired MANPADS rockets, and "heavy weaponry" in and just outside of Libya
.

http://e-ring.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/09/13/congress_was_warned_about_libya_last_month

I expect this to die down as people realize that it is not as simple as they want to make it sound.

Nor is there a PTB in question.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
39. "The Independent" is considered left-leaning, if anything.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:44 PM
Sep 2012
When the paper was established in 1986, the founders intended its political stance to reflect the centre of the British political spectrum and thought that it would take readers primarily from The Times and The Daily Telegraph. It is now seen as leaning to the left, making it more a competitor to "The Guardian".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Independent#Political_views

In the 2010 General Election they endorsed the Liberal Democrats.
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
49. They are owned by a guy who used to work for the KGB. Tell me how 'independent' they are? nt
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:48 PM
Sep 2012

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
78. Exactly. As IF the KGB gave a shit about ideology.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:18 PM
Sep 2012

They cared a lot about spying and torture and controlling everyone's lives. Socialism or communism? Don't make me laugh.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
106. Haha.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:16 PM
Sep 2012

And some people seem to have confused the old Soviet Union with a liberal haven of some sort. Stalin changed all that. The Russian people deserved so much better. They deserved what they fought for in their Revolution.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
122. If that's your argument, and Putin is ex-KGB, wouldn't they want President Obama re-elected?
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:11 PM
Sep 2012

If the answer to that is yes, what does that do to your argument?

muriel_volestrangler

(106,212 posts)
134. It's the paper Robert Fisk and Patrick Cockburn report on the Middle East for
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 06:17 AM
Sep 2012

Just check how much they've been quoted on DU. Yes, it's reporting on Arabic countries is 'independent'.

While Lebedev was KGB, he is also an owner, along with Gorbachev, of Novaya Gazeta - which is an indpenedent Russian paper, critical of Putin. Anna Politkovskaya worked for it before she was murdered (probably by the government).

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
135. You are always KGB. Just like Bob Woodward will always be Naval Intelligence. Don't kid yourself--
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 06:39 AM
Sep 2012

this is a planted story, at just the right time.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
24. Obama didn't want to attack Iran because he didn't want the Middle East to erupt in violence....
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:40 PM
Sep 2012

So now the Middle East erupts in violence.

What a coincidence!

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
51. You made it sound like youre almost happy over whats happening
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:49 PM
Sep 2012

Sorry if I read it the wrong way.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
121. Frankly, I don't disagree with that.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:05 PM
Sep 2012

The RW only wants an attack on Iran so they can show the world how high & mighty we supposedly are.......

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
58. It's not acceptable here to show any concern this close to an election.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:54 PM
Sep 2012

The acceptable reactions to a story like this are to deny it outright (posting the single word "Bullshit" works for this); you can suggest that the OP is a troll (time-honored phrases like "thank you for your concern", or "concern noted" work well here); you can attack the source of the story (state that the newspaper is a "right-wing rag", for example); you can claim that the story was planted by the Republicans; but what you cannot do is to express any misgivings over the possibility that the story is true.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
73. On matters of foreign policy crises and the Russian Mafia OWNS
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:11 PM
Sep 2012

THE PAPER then taking the article with a "meh" is the appropriate response. In fact it's the only response anyone with a lick of sense would have, absent another independent source of impeccable reputation.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
101. Those two
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:05 PM
Sep 2012

have an agenda, and we know what it is.

Just acknowledge their agenda, and make sure that you weigh your opinion in when they offer their anti-DU agenda here. Better the devils we know than the devils we don't.

 

nebenaube

(3,496 posts)
29. Typical hyperbole...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:41 PM
Sep 2012

Over sensationalizes, I'm not surprised? I suspect t might be planted.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
41. It's fucking disgusting
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:45 PM
Sep 2012

And I apologize for using the F-Word, but there is no other way of expressing how low this is.

 

Liberal_in_LA

(44,397 posts)
34. doesn't really matter if the story is true or not. Repubs will start the drumbeat and eventually
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:43 PM
Sep 2012

they'll all believe it.

 

liberallibral

(272 posts)
40. This worries me as well...
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:45 PM
Sep 2012

Romney is already running around like a nut, spewing garbage about President Obama....

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
37. Bullshit article
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:44 PM
Sep 2012

from a paper that is convinced that the US must be lead by a Republican. If this is true, that means that our leaders are straight up traitors - I don't believe it.

What I believe is that Republicans, in a time when our country was attacked, are fomenting discord in an attempt to make our leaders look bad. That makes THEM traitors.

Disgusting as it gets. Fuck Republicans for this.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
54. This sounds like a plant by Republicans. Still, I hope and pray this isn't true. I doubt it is.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:50 PM
Sep 2012

Can you imagine Obama not doing anything after receiving credible info? Esp since Bush hadn't done anything after receiving a Presidential Bulletin, preceded by other warnings, before 9/11? I seriously doubt it. His primary concern is to save lives. He would have taken action to do something, if only to get the people out of the embassy, before 9/11.

This sounds like a plant by Republicans.

 

oviedodem

(1,824 posts)
56. Look at it this way. If you put them on high alert and/or send troops then you look panicky. Second
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:52 PM
Sep 2012

how do you know which embassy.

No U.S. embassy is protected enough. In order to do that you practically need a military force stationed there. Last i checked, all embassies in the middle east have basically been under alert since 9/11. This goes along with my theory that RW'ers or Israel are behind the attacks.

AnnieBW

(12,717 posts)
60. Federal Installations Were On Alert for 9/11 Anyway
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 08:55 PM
Sep 2012

Most US Government installations were on alert because of the anniversary of 9/11. This wouldn't be the first time that Al Qaeda tried something on that date. This is especially true of embassies in the Middle East. So, did we "know" of an attack? No. Were they on alert for a possible one? Yeah.

reflection

(6,287 posts)
70. I stand with my president and his SoS
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:03 PM
Sep 2012

until I get more information. One newspaper article is not going to knock me off stride. If it's true, it will be dealt with, if it's not, then screw it.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
79. Me too
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:18 PM
Sep 2012

This smells of Mitt Romney discovering that his campaign got destroyed by his actions. I stand firm with Obama and Secretary of State Clinton and I don't give a shit who knows it.

Mutiny In Heaven

(550 posts)
77. Un-named sources
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:17 PM
Sep 2012

Leaking information about an incredibly sensitive situation.

I think this is less a "leak" and more "Republican foreign policy figures offering their version of reality".

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
82. Exactly
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:22 PM
Sep 2012

This is an attempt at Republican shit-stirring. It appears that the only ones that stink are themselves.

Jennicut

(25,415 posts)
84. Who are the "senior diplomatic sources"?
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:24 PM
Sep 2012

Hard to prove this without naming who the sources are.

Mutiny In Heaven

(550 posts)
86. Exactly.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:27 PM
Sep 2012

I'm not sure any intelligent person would take this kind of "leak" seriously without named sources.

Sadly, the eventual target audience from whoever handed the press this story does not consist of intelligent people. No, they want the same crowd who equivocate Obama and Kerry criticising Bush FP with Romney's ludicrous 9/11 fit.

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
80. If your concern is real... I'd BE SHOCKED..
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:19 PM
Sep 2012

Its customary to put something in your post to indicate what the content of the link is about.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
85. This is RW shit-stirring
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:24 PM
Sep 2012

Or their lame attempt at it. They appear to be the ones that stink, and now we know who they are by their smell.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
89. There's nothing there
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:37 PM
Sep 2012

Read the article. There's really nothing there when you dig deep.

This will actually be beneficial to Obama IMO. A desperate Romney will likely try to go after this hard and it will take him off his message of the economy.

Problem is, there's nothing there except unnamed sources and hearsay. Many foreign US installations are on alert during Sep 11th anyways.

If the Republicans try to attack Obama over this again and again, they will look like the desperate assholes they are.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
129. They Seem To Be Conflating Three Story Lines
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:48 PM
Sep 2012

Story Line One- There was a breach of security on behalf of Libyan security (entirely plausible)
Story Line Two- The act was premeditated at some low cell level (entirely plausible)
Story Line Three -The US knew their embassy was going to be attacked and elected to do nothing (entirely implausible)

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
133. Another thing
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 12:36 AM
Sep 2012

while the deaths were a result of the attacks, they died of smoke inhalation.

CNN: Ambassador Stevens, Others Died Of Smoke Inhalation
http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/cnn-ambassador-stevens-others-died-of-smoke-inhalation

Romney is failing badly and the RW is extremely desperate.



 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
91. Whisper Campaign
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 09:43 PM
Sep 2012

I'm sure the more politically adept amongst us know what that is for what it is. Whisper Campaign because Romney failed to look "Presidential" on foreign affairs.

If you want that horror leading us, I don't know what to say.

progressivebydesign

(19,458 posts)
108. Frankly the whole thing smacks of a Cheney production. Hmm. "Obama doesn't attend briefings" meme
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:26 PM
Sep 2012

The 9/11 anniversary when people pointed out that Bush ignored intelligence. Netenyahu suddenly going apeshit on the President, and causing troubles that were NOT there before, (don't forget that Adelson is a major pal of Netenyahu, and supporter of the Neocons and Romney.) Then you have this Christian posing as an Israeli, making a crass film designed SOLELY to inflame violence in the ME, released RIGHT at that moment, when the other things come together.

Don't forget that Darth Cheney also resurfaced on 9/11 to attack the PResident. Plus, the coordinated attack on the President during this entire 24 hour period of the Consolate attacks, including Romney's press conference called before the President could speak about the tragedy. Remember ROMNEY did not write those words, someone fed them to him, and at the same time Palin, Malkin, the RNC/Priebus, had the same exact line of attack on the President.

And today.. it's the Apology meme.. And now they're attacking the President's "aim first, then shoot" comment, which was TOTALLY deserved, and pales by comparison to the egregious comments by Romney, the most vile candidate in American history.

The NEOCONS are running the show right now. I have no doubt. This is their plan to get their worthless fuck of a candidate out of the bargain basement of polling. They can't make America like him.. nope.. but they CAN make America be AFRAID again... that's their specialty. This is scary shit.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
113. I agree--to reiterate what you say, I don't know who was ultimately behind the attacks,
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:44 PM
Sep 2012

but my foil hat is on, and has been since yesterday--the speed of the GOP attack, before they had even found all the bodies, Cheney saying Obama doesn't attend intelligence briefings, Mittens walking away from the podium like a man very confident about something...the coordinated "He's weak! He apologizes!" when none of it happened that way. The nature and timing of the whole thing--it just smells.

deaniac21

(6,747 posts)
114. Obama has been the best president ever, in dealing with the middle east.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:47 PM
Sep 2012

Irna and Hezbolla fear him.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
117. I am old enough to remember when trolls actually had game.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 10:58 PM
Sep 2012

You fail.

Yeah, I just wrote/said that.

DemocratSinceBirth

(101,853 posts)
128. I Told Him/Her To Bend Over So He Or She Could Give Evil (Romney) An Opening
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:31 PM
Sep 2012

Ya happy...


Yeah I said it/wrote it...

on edit- I am old enough to remember that some of the trolls have stars and relatively high post counts.



aaaaaa5a

(4,686 posts)
127. Politico has the White house response.
Thu Sep 13, 2012, 11:29 PM
Sep 2012

From the article:


Shawn Turner, spokesman for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, emailed: “This is absolutely wrong. We are not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. Mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81198.html#ixzz26PYNQEAY
 

WilliamPitt

(58,179 posts)
136. I'm pretty surprised by the responses in this thread.
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 07:52 AM
Sep 2012

This report is deeply disturbing...and it isn't out of the realm of possibility that a security breach has taken place. You make the Independent sound like WorldNetDaily. It isn't.

I'm not a troll, and this worries me.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
141. Completely Unsourced...
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 09:43 AM
Sep 2012

Other than a couple of quotes from alleged Libyans who were allegedly on the scene.

I think you can use this one to wrap old fish.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If this story is true... ...