Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,957 posts)
Mon May 4, 2020, 02:27 PM May 2020

A new analysis shows that just 10 states have met even basic standards for testing

More than half of the states in the US plan to start reopening by the end of the week, but the vast majority of the country is not meeting even relatively basic standards when it comes to testing for the coronavirus.

The Associated Press published an analysis over the weekend that found just 10 states were conducting the amount of testing experts say is needed to stay on top of the pandemic.

High levels of testing are necessary to spot pockets of infections and contain them before they spread. For this to work, people who don't show symptoms need to be tested too, since they can still carry and spread the virus.

The federal government has shied away from issuing definitive testing standards for a state to reopen, which it says should be left to them.

It has floated a less official ballpark figure, however, and scientists at Harvard also set a different standard, which the AP used to measure the testing regimes of each state. Only 10 passed on both counts, and 19 failed on both.

-snip-

Overall, just 10 states meet both the federal and Harvard testing minimums. They are North Dakota, New Mexico, Alaska, West Virginia, Utah, Idaho, Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, and Delaware.

https://news.yahoo.com/while-most-us-starting-reopen-112401743.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A new analysis shows that just 10 states have met even basic standards for testing (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2020 OP
Interesting. Where did they get the tests? onecaliberal May 2020 #1
Are all but one of those governors..Republicans? Think about that one. Stuart G May 2020 #2
Just a damned coincidence Proud Liberal Dem May 2020 #3
Two FreeState May 2020 #6
I noticed that immediately. Hence the question. onecaliberal May 2020 #8
tRump-Jar-Jar corruption. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2020 #5
We have hardly tested at all in Kansas. MuseRider May 2020 #4
Cause Birx wouldn't answer the question on what "adequate" testing was during the presser. The ... uponit7771 May 2020 #7

FreeState

(10,572 posts)
6. Two
Mon May 4, 2020, 03:03 PM
May 2020

Overall, just 10 states meet both the federal and Harvard testing minimums. They are North Dakota, New Mexico, Alaska, West Virginia, Utah, Idaho, Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, and Delaware.

North Dakota - Doug Burgum, Republican
New Mexico - Michelle Lujan Grisham, Democrat
Alaska - Mike Dunleavy, Republican
West Virginia - Jim Justice, Republican
Utah - Gary Herbert, Republican
Idaho - Brad Little, Republican
Tennessee - Bill Lee, Republican
Alabama - Kay Ivey, Republican
Arkansas - Asa Hutchinson, Republican
Delaware - John Carney, Democrat

onecaliberal

(32,854 posts)
8. I noticed that immediately. Hence the question.
Mon May 4, 2020, 07:01 PM
May 2020

I my rural minority city in California, you can’t get a test even if you have it. I guess the Governor is satisfied with 25,000 tests a day in a 34 million person state because we’re starting to open up on Friday.

MuseRider

(34,108 posts)
4. We have hardly tested at all in Kansas.
Mon May 4, 2020, 02:52 PM
May 2020

We lack a lot of what is needed and our numbers are beginning to rise quite a bit more than before. I have a note for a phone conversation about getting a test, I have rotten lungs and have had a few symptoms but I think I will wait and let others have the tests. I do not feel bad enough to have it I do not think.

Supposedly we are getting a lot of test kits soon but where are they from? Are they good kits? This has to be the biggest fuck up in the history of the world as far as a leader caring for their country with a warning of what was coming. We are never going to know when it is safe, what numbers we have had and what we did wrong since even our tests and reporting methods are unreliable.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
7. Cause Birx wouldn't answer the question on what "adequate" testing was during the presser. The ...
Mon May 4, 2020, 03:44 PM
May 2020

... outline for what testing was asinine.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A new analysis shows that...