Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
Fri May 8, 2020, 12:14 AM May 2020

The White House's coronavirus cure is even more magical than we could have imagined (WaPo column)

I'm sorry this is behind a paywall, but it's really a very important article.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-white-houses-coronavirus-cure-is-even-more-magical-than-we-could-have-imagined/2020/05/07/bde463f4-9097-11ea-a0bc-4e9ad4866d21_story.html#comments-wrapper

By Catherine Rampell ~ Columnist
May 7, 2020

We’ve all hoped and prayed for something to save us from this pandemic. Will it be a vaccine? A therapeutic drug? Large-scale testing and tracing? An antibodies-rich llama or pack of virus-sniffing dogs?

Nope. According to the White House, the real coronavirus cure is even more magical: tax cuts.

At least the GOP is consistent.

To today’s Republicans, who long ago abandoned any pretense of fiscal responsibility, tax cuts are the all-purpose remedy for whatever ails the country (or doesn’t). When the economy is good, cut taxes. When the economy is bad, cut taxes. When the deficit is high, cut taxes; when the deficit is low, or has even flipped to surplus, cut taxes then, too.

Even so, the tax proposals the Trump administration is floating appear especially irrelevant to today’s problems. Consider the four most frequently offered up by administration officials.


(more below)

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The White House's coronavirus cure is even more magical than we could have imagined (WaPo column) (Original Post) scarletwoman May 2020 OP
More excerpts: scarletwoman May 2020 #1
Further excerpts: scarletwoman May 2020 #3
Continued excerpts: scarletwoman May 2020 #4
WaPo is being too harsh. GOPers always add a dash of deregulation to tax cut fever. Hermit-The-Prog May 2020 #2
Kick for more eyes. (nt) scarletwoman May 2020 #5
That isn't news to me. Newest Reality May 2020 #6
No, not really news for anyone who has been paying attention to the decades-long trajectory scarletwoman May 2020 #8
Well said NR DENVERPOPS May 2020 #10
de-barr doesn't have the power to over rule a Federal election. Lock him up. May 2020 #12
BARR may or may not have the power DENVERPOPS May 2020 #13
Thanks for this. babylonsister May 2020 #7
When all else fails, try to "buy" votes (from the rubes) with the lure of tax cuts. alwaysinasnit May 2020 #9
hmmm ... the ruling class sure does think a lot about the interests of the ruling class struggle4progress May 2020 #11

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
1. More excerpts:
Fri May 8, 2020, 12:16 AM
May 2020
First is President Trump’s repeated call to expand the deductibility of business meals and entertainment expenses.

The White House has had two months and nearly unlimited resources to develop a plan for rescuing the economy, and so far this brain trust hasn’t come up with anything better than letting companies write off Yankees tickets and steak dinners.

No matter that major athletic events and concerts remain canceled, meaning that there are few entertainment opportunities available to deduct. Or that even where restaurants have reopened, Americans are afraid to dine out, on the company's dime or otherwise.

Never mind that procuring the ingredients for expense-account meals has become challenging, what with meat-processing plant closures caused by hordes of sickened workers. Or that most of the people laid off and most of the smaller eateries facing bankruptcy are unlikely to be the typical beneficiaries of “three-martini lunches” anyway.

No matter. Let them eat steak!

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
3. Further excerpts:
Fri May 8, 2020, 12:19 AM
May 2020
Then there are the various proposals to cut — or possibly eliminate — capital gains taxes, a favorite hobbyhorse of White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow. This would be a huge windfall for the wealthiest Americans and is unlikely to have any substantial stimulative effect on the economy.

Capital gains are already taxed extremely lightly. Long-term capital gains are taxed at a preferential (that is, much lower) rate than regular income. And most of those gains accrue to the ultra-wealthy. According to the Tax Policy Center, three-quarters of taxable long-term capital gains go to households in the top 5 percent of the income distribution.

“A capital gains tax cut would be both ineffective and regressive,” said Steven M. Rosenthal, a fellow at the center.

Then there’s the proposal to make permanent a provision of the 2017 tax law, one that allows firms to immediately write off the full cost of most kinds of capital investments.

Already, full expensing is in effect through 2022. This proposal, then, would “spend billions to incentivize businesses to buy equipment 32 months from now,” as New York University law professor Lily Batchelder put it, remarking that this was “among the dumbest stimulus ideas I’ve ever heard.”

If anything, this proposal might discourage businesses from spending, because there’d be no urgency to get the expensing in while it could be fully written off. Businesses could wait indefinitely to build factories or buy equipment, knowing that the tax break would always be there.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
4. Continued excerpts:
Fri May 8, 2020, 12:24 AM
May 2020
Finally, there is the proposed payroll tax cut.

The government has already deferred some employer-side payroll taxes until 2021 and 2022. Trump and other White House aides say they want to temporarily eliminate employee-side payroll taxes, too.

Of all Trump’s tax-cut proposals, this one at least has the theoretical possibility of helping regular workers, to the extent that the incidence of these taxes is borne by employees rather than firms. Still, if consumers are afraid to go out, and employers can’t guarantee safe workplaces, slashing payroll taxes is unlikely to result in much hiring. Payroll tax relief is an ineffective way to provide assistance to people not actually on payrolls.

One might argue that it’s easy to shoot down bad ideas and harder to come up with good ones. So if not these things, what should we be doing to heal the economy?

This economic crisis is, at heart, a public health crisis. The economic pain won’t be fully resolved until it’s safer for people to work, shop and socialize again, no matter the available tax boondoggles. The economy has been shut down for two months to buy the government time to come up with effective public health interventions — such as scaling up testing or spurring medical innovations.

But, hey, dusting off old tax breaks is just so much more fun.

Newest Reality

(12,712 posts)
6. That isn't news to me.
Fri May 8, 2020, 12:38 AM
May 2020

It's just a more blatant indicator of the results of gross inequity and who is really being represented.

When the going gets tough, the wealthy get more! The people are on their own, basically. We all know a tax cut is not going to help someone with little or no income and capital gains just means wealthy people stuff, to put it jokingly.

We are being told there that one part of the shift of power, oligarchy, is getting their cut and it is even being waved in our faces, which may not go over well for hungry, jobless and potentially homeless people. But who cares, right?

So: oligarchy, Fascism and theocracy are the three pinions of what this government is trying to forge as our future. They each have different goals that converge into a new, American bundle of sticks. It will be a dark, dystopian, cruel, banana republic, but that's just the good part.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
8. No, not really news for anyone who has been paying attention to the decades-long trajectory
Fri May 8, 2020, 01:05 AM
May 2020

of Capital vs. Labor. Serfdom, it is.

DENVERPOPS

(8,818 posts)
10. Well said NR
Fri May 8, 2020, 03:15 AM
May 2020

We are a millimeter away from it, and they aren't even pretending to wait until the election.
(Which Barr would over rule anyway if a Dem wins) It's pretty much a Fascist Tyranny or Dictatorship already and they are all full steam ahead putting the finishing touches on their Coup............

WASF

Lock him up.

(6,928 posts)
12. de-barr doesn't have the power to over rule a Federal election.
Fri May 8, 2020, 03:55 AM
May 2020

Neither does the orange virus.

States (red 'n BLUE) manage it.

DENVERPOPS

(8,818 posts)
13. BARR may or may not have the power
Fri May 8, 2020, 04:00 PM
May 2020

But obviously, and historically, the Supreme Court sure thinks they have the power... Gore---2000????????

I think that Barr can sure as hell come up with all kinds of false Bullshit from the FBI and Intelligence Community that says the Dems corrupted the election.......therefore ruling the election invalid......

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The White House's coronav...