HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Biden Accuser Charged wit...

Fri May 8, 2020, 02:23 AM

Biden Accuser Charged with Check Kiting a few days before termination?

Last edited Fri May 8, 2020, 06:00 PM - Edit history (2)

This seems to be the same person. It’s the same town her mom called Larry King from, which was also a few days after this charge.


?s=21

Update: confirmation from courthouse.


?s=21

27 replies, 2304 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 27 replies Author Time Post
Reply Biden Accuser Charged with Check Kiting a few days before termination? (Original post)
Loki Liesmith May 2020 OP
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2020 #1
Skittles May 2020 #2
Loki Liesmith May 2020 #3
krawhitham May 2020 #4
Amishman May 2020 #23
AJT May 2020 #5
Loki Liesmith May 2020 #6
creeksneakers2 May 2020 #7
Loki Liesmith May 2020 #25
Historic NY May 2020 #8
octoberlib May 2020 #9
Cha May 2020 #11
octoberlib May 2020 #12
Cha May 2020 #14
Cha May 2020 #10
octoberlib May 2020 #13
Cha May 2020 #15
octoberlib May 2020 #16
Cha May 2020 #17
Loki Liesmith May 2020 #21
Cha May 2020 #22
Loki Liesmith May 2020 #24
Cha May 2020 #26
DeterDeter May 2020 #18
sunonmars May 2020 #19
videohead5 May 2020 #20
Loki Liesmith May 2020 #27

Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 02:30 AM

1. Yep

That was a few days before she was supposedly fired by Joe Biden.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 02:33 AM

2. I suspect Joe knows she is mentally troubled

yup

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Skittles (Reply #2)

Fri May 8, 2020, 02:35 AM

3. I'm just wondering

If this is why she was let go after all? Or perhaps allowed to resign. This would show up in her clearances.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #3)

Fri May 8, 2020, 02:43 AM

4. So she became a security risk and knew she would be fired from her Senate job

she quit instead and gave her family some BS excuse about being asked to hand out drinks because she had nice legs

Explains mom's phone call and the ex husbands court records

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to krawhitham (Reply #4)

Fri May 8, 2020, 08:00 AM

23. That makes a lot of sense

and unfortunately she has an opportunity to turn that old cover story into a media circus for personal profit. Between things like GoFundMe, book/media deals, and even quiet funneling of money her way from republican moneymen; I can easily see ways that this could be lucrative.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 02:48 AM

5. Is there any other news outlet that has confirmed this?

I haven't been able find anything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to AJT (Reply #5)

Fri May 8, 2020, 03:09 AM

6. Too new

This was just uncovered by some randos searching court records.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 03:51 AM

7. Was that the name she was using in 1993?

I think her real first name is Alexandra. Wouldn't they use that on an arrest record?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to creeksneakers2 (Reply #7)

Fri May 8, 2020, 08:09 AM

25. Apparently as it's on her termination paperwork

Assuming this is legit:
?s=21

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 03:53 AM

8. She said she wanted him to drop out

take a polygraph and find the papers in Delaware. She refused to take a polygraph herself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)


Response to octoberlib (Reply #9)

Fri May 8, 2020, 04:42 AM

11. TY for this tweet, octoberlib.. hadn't seen this one!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #11)

Fri May 8, 2020, 04:50 AM

12. This is the statute cited in the fraud charge.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to octoberlib (Reply #12)

Fri May 8, 2020, 05:02 AM

14. So Reade is Projecting.. she is the "crminal"..

Mahalo, octoberlib

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 04:38 AM

10. that Tweet is Unavailable now, Loki.. I imagine it's

screenshot some place. TY


TY, Octoberlib!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #10)

Fri May 8, 2020, 04:52 AM

13. I deleted the tweet because BidenBigade deleted

the screenshot and it was proof.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to octoberlib (Reply #13)

Fri May 8, 2020, 05:06 AM

15. I was wondering why you deleted

your post.

Why would the Biden Brigade delete the tweet do you think?

So the copy I c/p is not valid?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #15)

Fri May 8, 2020, 05:35 AM

16. They just deleted the screenshot of the statute

Don’t know why. Maybe they’re afraid she’ll sue them for something.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to octoberlib (Reply #16)

Fri May 8, 2020, 05:39 AM

17. Thanks.. it does get confusing

sometimes with all this long history of conflicted statements and lies.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #10)

Fri May 8, 2020, 07:49 AM

21. Dude deleted and reposted not sure why

Here’s the new link.
?s=21

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #21)

Fri May 8, 2020, 07:55 AM

22. Thank you.. might have been

a typo or some kind of mistake.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cha (Reply #22)

Fri May 8, 2020, 08:06 AM

24. I know why now.

They found the docs on three out of four legal search engines but the tweet was starting to go viral. Calling courthouse today to get confirmation. They left the documents up in a less explosive tweet so people can continue to research.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #24)

Fri May 8, 2020, 03:36 PM

26. TY!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 06:41 AM

18. I wish that reporters would write about this responsibly

So that it wasn't up to the wild west of the internet. Even in the initial reports that did not find anything, they leave out about 75% of the other contradictions and backstories that have been widely reported online. I think that are just really do not want to appear to be smearing someone who could be a victim. Maybe they are doing more reporting that will come out, but in the meantime, they (Washington Post, NYT) have let their op ed pages run amuck with speculation.

But people do have to be careful about posting about this sort of stuff on Twitter, in case it's not her. I'm guessing that if this WAS her, that the checks don't have anything to do with her firing, or her resigning. I had figured that maybe her 2019 story could be some version of true, but I'm doubting that now too. I think the reason why she sometimes says that she was fired and sometimes said that she resigned-and Tara had also written in a blog that it was clear she was "going to be fired for legitimate or illigimate reasons"- was that the "deal" that she told her ex-husband about was not a deal at all. More likely, she was just not a good employee ( did not want to do the work) or fit for the office, and she was told that she could either be fired or that she could resign "for personal reasons". That happens all of the time. Maybe something like what she described (not wanting to serve drinks) happened, but it also could be that she put that spin on the story to gain sympathy from her ex husband or to save face. I tried to have as open mind as possible, but I think that we are dealing with a master manipulator here. I also think that it's very likely that she has been abused in her life, but not by Biden or his office. The Vox article was good, but even that was extremely generous to her outright lying to the reporter. I understand what the reporter means, but should they really "want" a story to be true, or should they just try to separate themselves from that and do the reporting? I have a hard time remembering employees from a 5 years ago, especially if they were in lower level positions and only worked 9 months, but Tara's stories involve MANY people, and she seems to have a very complicated history where someone from her past is going to come out and disclose other contradictions about her account.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 06:59 AM

19. I think its going to become clear she is a Grade A fruitcake fantasist and compulsive liar.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 07:05 AM

20. Tara Reade changed her story and so did

Her brother and friend. Her brother first said that his sister told him that Biden touched her shoulder and neck then a few hours later changed his story and added touching her under her skirt. The friend told one story last year and changed her story this year. This is total BS!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)

Fri May 8, 2020, 05:59 PM

27. Confirmation from courthouse

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread