General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Roberts denounced for refusal to investigate federal judge's sudden retirement
Published 4 mins ago
on May 9, 2020
By Common Dreams - Commentary
In what the advocacy group Demand Justice called a Friday news dump, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said he would not direct a federal court to conduct an ethics inquiry into the retirement of Judge Thomas Griffith from the second-highest court in the country.
Demand Justice had called for the investigation into Griffiths decision to step down, which leaves a seat open for Trumps right-wing appointee, Judge Justin Walker.
As Common Dreams reported earlier this week, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has been reaching out to veteran conservative judges like Griffith to assure them that if they step down now, they would have a worthy successor.
The group has demanded to know whether McConnell was in touch with Griffith before he decided to retire.
snip
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/05/justice-roberts-denounced-for-refusal-to-investigate-federal-judges-sudden-retirement/
------------------------------------------------------------------
And the republic dies a little bit more.
CurtEastPoint
(18,639 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)His Honor ends up on a cushy "board of directors" somewhere, you know, like say, an energy company, or a Republican benefactor company, or perhaps a "paid advisor" to the Koch Brothers funding machine.
Actually, Moscow Mitch McTurtle could probably give you the most succinct answer to that - because I am SURE that he does know the answer!
stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)that would be worthy of an investigation. However .. the complaint makes no such allegation .. and asks to investigate whether the Senator was "in contact" with the sitting judge. And Roberts had the reaction one might have predicted ... "So what?"
MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)would be no different than the Senate Impeachment hearings - "So what?"
stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)of the Senate. So that's like .. different.
MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)Go to the Senate.
*Bring all the evidence you want - get all of the witnesses you can (but you can't use them here) - and then we'll vote*.
*Oh, by the way, save yourself the bother - there's no harm, no foul here............."
stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)The result is .. nada.
--- -- -- ---
jimfields33
(15,769 posts)I hope to be done at 67 when first day of eligibility to retire and collect. I always wonder why people who dont have to continue to work until death. No thanks!!! Of course if financially I have to I will but I sure hope not.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)busted. Put my old law clerk in my place as he is more conservative than me and a lot younger. If you do those things I will retire from SCOTUS!
Same song and dance that has already been taking place.
SharonAnn
(13,772 posts)forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)The Democrat Senators encouraging RBG to retire before Obamas term ended?
Many here are still peeved that she didnt retire then, and would have cheered if someone on our side would have encouraged it while we still had the majority in the Senate.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)not 'Democrat senators'.
forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)Truly it was an auto correct problem. Im on my iPhone (which I usually never am).
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)but we tend (as humans) to be myopic.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,992 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)It was an auto correct on my iPhone. I usually never type on it, and didnt notice the problem.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,992 posts)stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)and you're still after your pound of flesh? How'zit up there in the clouds with the spiritual beings?
--- ---
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,992 posts)There is too much dependence on auto-correct far and wide. It's a reasonable first line of defence but it has no concept of grammar or meaning. It is worth encouraging people to proofread as the last line of defence.
I didn't call the poster names or imply any insults such as your "spiritual beings".
I was not vindictive like your "pound of flesh".
But I did thank them after accepting their explanation. The remark about proofreading was offered without rancour or snark or anger.
I stated facts, since it is an RW trope. I engaged with the member offering advice that auto-correct is not sufficient and the poster always has the option of proofreading a post which can catch lots of things, especially as the poster remarked they are aware of the trope, which is a good thing.
And you finish your post with an insincere hat tip.
stopdiggin
(11,296 posts)but would have been really unfortunate if it happened later than that. (Scalia?)
As it is, Obama had two successful appointments .. and that's about on par. And there's also the argument that another Obama pick might not have been as liberal (or progressive?) as RBG.
But to get back to your central thesis .. no difference.
moose65
(3,166 posts)Do you have any evidence of that? I dont remember any Democratic Senators encouraging her to retire.
forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)Every time RBG is hospitalized people here complain that she should have retired when we controlled the Senate. I asked how different it would have been if one of our Senators had encouraged her to retire. We would have been 100% behind them.
If there is no suggestion of a monetary incentive that Mitch handed out to these Judges, I just dont see it as illegal, or even anything that the Chief Justice should look into. If you disagree, thats fine. I just see these sentiments every single time Justice Ginsburg gets sick. If you dont think we would have cheered, and encouraged her to retire back then, you are crazy.
Blue Owl
(50,349 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,992 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,282 posts)and Roberts doesn't want to open that can of worms.