Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

catbyte

(34,373 posts)
Sat May 9, 2020, 02:58 PM May 2020

Justice Roberts denounced for refusal to investigate federal judge's sudden retirement

Published 4 mins ago

on May 9, 2020

By Common Dreams - Commentary

In what the advocacy group Demand Justice called a “Friday news dump,” U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said he would not direct a federal court to conduct an ethics inquiry into the retirement of Judge Thomas Griffith from the second-highest court in the country.

Demand Justice had called for the investigation into Griffith’s decision to step down, which leaves a seat open for Trump’s right-wing appointee, Judge Justin Walker.

As Common Dreams reported earlier this week, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has been reaching out to veteran conservative judges like Griffith to assure them that if they step down now, “they would have a worthy successor.”

The group has demanded to know whether McConnell was in touch with Griffith before he decided to retire.

snip

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/05/justice-roberts-denounced-for-refusal-to-investigate-federal-judges-sudden-retirement/

------------------------------------------------------------------
And the republic dies a little bit more.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Roberts denounced for refusal to investigate federal judge's sudden retirement (Original Post) catbyte May 2020 OP
What is in it for the retiree if they do step down or what happens if they DON'T? CurtEastPoint May 2020 #1
Perhaps be curious to see if MyOwnPeace May 2020 #2
if something like that is in play here stopdiggin May 2020 #4
I agree......... MyOwnPeace May 2020 #9
except that the House brought evidence to the floor stopdiggin May 2020 #11
But it was still the same results.......... MyOwnPeace May 2020 #15
that I won't argue. stopdiggin May 2020 #17
He's 65 so manybe social security? jimfields33 May 2020 #23
Kinda like you will pardon my son or giving you those shady "loans" if he is Dustlawyer May 2020 #26
I never thought he would agree to do that investigation. SharonAnn May 2020 #3
How is this different than forthemiddle May 2020 #5
For the record, they are "Democratic" Senators COLGATE4 May 2020 #6
Thank you. Ninga May 2020 #7
Thanks. UTUSN May 2020 #8
Sorry forthemiddle May 2020 #18
Thanks. COLGATE4 May 2020 #20
it isn't stopdiggin May 2020 #12
Please NEVER write "Democrat" as an adjective. That is a right wing trope. Don't propagate it. . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2020 #14
They know. nt RandiFan1290 May 2020 #16
Sorry forthemiddle May 2020 #19
OK, thanks. Proofreading works, auto-correct or no auto-correct. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2020 #21
Wow. so the person apologizes and gives and explanation stopdiggin May 2020 #24
Only one looking for a pound of flesh is you. You have the snide personal slam. Proofreading works. Bernardo de La Paz May 2020 #27
well .. that MIGHT have worked if it happened in the first 6 years stopdiggin May 2020 #22
When did that happen? moose65 May 2020 #28
I was referring to current day posts forthemiddle May 2020 #29
Thank God the grim reaper remains free and unharmed Blue Owl May 2020 #10
Same thing done with SCotUS Kennedy, whose son maintained tRump's loans at Deutsche Bank. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2020 #13
Yep, Mr.Bill May 2020 #25

MyOwnPeace

(16,925 posts)
2. Perhaps be curious to see if
Sat May 9, 2020, 03:07 PM
May 2020

His Honor ends up on a cushy "board of directors" somewhere, you know, like say, an energy company, or a Republican benefactor company, or perhaps a "paid advisor" to the Koch Brothers funding machine.

Actually, Moscow Mitch McTurtle could probably give you the most succinct answer to that - because I am SURE that he does know the answer!

stopdiggin

(11,296 posts)
4. if something like that is in play here
Sat May 9, 2020, 03:26 PM
May 2020

that would be worthy of an investigation. However .. the complaint makes no such allegation .. and asks to investigate whether the Senator was "in contact" with the sitting judge. And Roberts had the reaction one might have predicted ... "So what?"

MyOwnPeace

(16,925 posts)
15. But it was still the same results..........
Sat May 9, 2020, 03:40 PM
May 2020

Go to the Senate.

*Bring all the evidence you want - get all of the witnesses you can (but you can't use them here) - and then we'll vote*.

*Oh, by the way, save yourself the bother - there's no harm, no foul here............."

jimfields33

(15,769 posts)
23. He's 65 so manybe social security?
Sat May 9, 2020, 04:18 PM
May 2020

I hope to be done at 67 when first day of eligibility to retire and collect. I always wonder why people who don’t have to continue to work until death. No thanks!!! Of course if financially I have to I will but I sure hope not.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
26. Kinda like you will pardon my son or giving you those shady "loans" if he is
Sat May 9, 2020, 06:02 PM
May 2020

busted. Put my old law clerk in my place as he is more conservative than me and a lot younger. If you do those things I will retire from SCOTUS!

Same song and dance that has already been taking place.

forthemiddle

(1,379 posts)
5. How is this different than
Sat May 9, 2020, 03:26 PM
May 2020

The Democrat Senators encouraging RBG to retire before Obamas term ended?

Many here are still peeved that she didn’t retire then, and would have cheered if someone on our side would have encouraged it while we still had the majority in the Senate.

stopdiggin

(11,296 posts)
24. Wow. so the person apologizes and gives and explanation
Sat May 9, 2020, 04:22 PM
May 2020

and you're still after your pound of flesh? How'zit up there in the clouds with the spiritual beings?
--- ---

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,992 posts)
27. Only one looking for a pound of flesh is you. You have the snide personal slam. Proofreading works.
Sat May 9, 2020, 06:51 PM
May 2020

There is too much dependence on auto-correct far and wide. It's a reasonable first line of defence but it has no concept of grammar or meaning. It is worth encouraging people to proofread as the last line of defence.

I didn't call the poster names or imply any insults such as your "spiritual beings".

I was not vindictive like your "pound of flesh".

But I did thank them after accepting their explanation. The remark about proofreading was offered without rancour or snark or anger.

I stated facts, since it is an RW trope. I engaged with the member offering advice that auto-correct is not sufficient and the poster always has the option of proofreading a post which can catch lots of things, especially as the poster remarked they are aware of the trope, which is a good thing.

And you finish your post with an insincere hat tip.

stopdiggin

(11,296 posts)
22. well .. that MIGHT have worked if it happened in the first 6 years
Sat May 9, 2020, 04:18 PM
May 2020

but would have been really unfortunate if it happened later than that. (Scalia?)

As it is, Obama had two successful appointments .. and that's about on par. And there's also the argument that another Obama pick might not have been as liberal (or progressive?) as RBG.

But to get back to your central thesis .. no difference.

moose65

(3,166 posts)
28. When did that happen?
Sat May 9, 2020, 07:31 PM
May 2020

Do you have any evidence of that? I don’t remember any Democratic Senators encouraging her to retire.

forthemiddle

(1,379 posts)
29. I was referring to current day posts
Sat May 9, 2020, 07:40 PM
May 2020

Every time RBG is hospitalized people here complain that she should have retired when we controlled the Senate. I asked how different it would have been if one of our Senators had encouraged her to retire. We would have been 100% behind them.

If there is no suggestion of a monetary incentive that Mitch handed out to these Judges, I just don’t see it as illegal, or even anything that the Chief Justice should look into. If you disagree, that’s fine. I just see these sentiments every single time Justice Ginsburg gets sick. If you don’t think we would have cheered, and encouraged her to retire back then, you are crazy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice Roberts denounced...