Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

struggle4progress

(118,269 posts)
Sun May 10, 2020, 11:16 PM May 2020

Why aren't editorial boards screaming?

By Joe Lockhart
Updated 8:18 PM ET, Sun May 10, 2020

... After three years of political and actual carnage under Trump, including Robert Mueller's description of acts that amounted to, he told Congress, obstruction of justice; Trump's "fine people on both sides" reaction to a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville where a counter-protester was killed; his rampant conflicts of interest and credible accusations of his violations of the emoluments clause of the Constitution; his close to 17,000 false statements; a travel ban that primarily targets mostly Muslim-majority countries; impeachment for alleged extortion of a foreign government (he was acquitted in the Republican Senate), and the gross mishandling of a deadly pandemic, you'd think somebody on an editorial board might say it's time for the President to leave ...

... by August of 1974, almost every major daily newspaper had called for President Richard Nixon's resignation over the Watergate scandal. The most prominent exception was the New York Times, which argued that it was the impeachment process that should determine the fate of the President ...

Twenty-four years later, in 1998, more than 100 newspapers called for the resignation of President Bill Clinton, both during the Kenneth Starr investigation and the subsequent impeachment trial for obstruction of justice and perjury, over his affair with a White House intern ...

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/10/opinions/why-dont-editorial-boards-call-for-trump-to-resign-lockhart/index.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

jimfields33

(15,758 posts)
1. Trump's a money maker for all media
Sun May 10, 2020, 11:22 PM
May 2020

Sad to say of course. I mean newspapers have been going away in a lot of areas in the United States and now they have this idiot who says crazy things. That sells papers and they survive another day. That is the only reason I can think of.

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
2. Sure seems to me that all the editorial boards are doing exactly what they're getting paid to do.
Sun May 10, 2020, 11:26 PM
May 2020

Which is to support tRUMP in spite of the mean ol' media charade...

DENVERPOPS

(8,802 posts)
11. Agreed
Mon May 11, 2020, 01:01 AM
May 2020

80=% of all media in the U.S. is owned by wealthy RepubliCONS.

Reagan, (actually SeniorBush and Cheney, et al) were the start of this Media Consolidation back in the Early 80's....

JI7

(89,244 posts)
5. the media treats everything like a sports game , both sides bs etc
Sun May 10, 2020, 11:29 PM
May 2020

Rachel Maddow is openly partisan in that we know where she personally stands. But her reporting is actually how most unbiased reporters should report things . She is reporting facts.

The media needs to push the Tara Reide thing because they need to report equal amounts of negative stuff on both sides . This includes ignoring or holding back on news on Trump which would be negative .

Response to struggle4progress (Original post)

yaesu

(8,020 posts)
12. the majority of news papers/stations in this country are owned by a handful of corporations
Mon May 11, 2020, 01:09 AM
May 2020

so free speech isn't really free anymore.

JohnnyRingo

(18,622 posts)
13. Editorials lead to cancellations.
Mon May 11, 2020, 01:46 AM
May 2020

And that's ill afforded in this age of the internet.

The result is a bunch of mealy mouthed newspaper editorials railing against opioids and dog park rules.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why aren't editorial boar...