General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy aren't editorial boards screaming?
By Joe Lockhart
Updated 8:18 PM ET, Sun May 10, 2020
... After three years of political and actual carnage under Trump, including Robert Mueller's description of acts that amounted to, he told Congress, obstruction of justice; Trump's "fine people on both sides" reaction to a white supremacist rally in Charlottesville where a counter-protester was killed; his rampant conflicts of interest and credible accusations of his violations of the emoluments clause of the Constitution; his close to 17,000 false statements; a travel ban that primarily targets mostly Muslim-majority countries; impeachment for alleged extortion of a foreign government (he was acquitted in the Republican Senate), and the gross mishandling of a deadly pandemic, you'd think somebody on an editorial board might say it's time for the President to leave ...
... by August of 1974, almost every major daily newspaper had called for President Richard Nixon's resignation over the Watergate scandal. The most prominent exception was the New York Times, which argued that it was the impeachment process that should determine the fate of the President ...
Twenty-four years later, in 1998, more than 100 newspapers called for the resignation of President Bill Clinton, both during the Kenneth Starr investigation and the subsequent impeachment trial for obstruction of justice and perjury, over his affair with a White House intern ...
https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/10/opinions/why-dont-editorial-boards-call-for-trump-to-resign-lockhart/index.html
jimfields33
(15,758 posts)Sad to say of course. I mean newspapers have been going away in a lot of areas in the United States and now they have this idiot who says crazy things. That sells papers and they survive another day. That is the only reason I can think of.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)Which is to support tRUMP in spite of the mean ol' media charade...
c-rational
(2,590 posts)rewritten.
DENVERPOPS
(8,802 posts)80=% of all media in the U.S. is owned by wealthy RepubliCONS.
Reagan, (actually SeniorBush and Cheney, et al) were the start of this Media Consolidation back in the Early 80's....
CanonRay
(14,093 posts)JI7
(89,244 posts)Rachel Maddow is openly partisan in that we know where she personally stands. But her reporting is actually how most unbiased reporters should report things . She is reporting facts.
The media needs to push the Tara Reide thing because they need to report equal amounts of negative stuff on both sides . This includes ignoring or holding back on news on Trump which would be negative .
onecaliberal
(32,811 posts)dalton99a
(81,426 posts)Against the people.
marlakay
(11,443 posts)Response to struggle4progress (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
BigmanPigman
(51,582 posts)yaesu
(8,020 posts)so free speech isn't really free anymore.
JohnnyRingo
(18,622 posts)And that's ill afforded in this age of the internet.
The result is a bunch of mealy mouthed newspaper editorials railing against opioids and dog park rules.