Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,922 posts)
Mon May 11, 2020, 08:52 PM May 2020

Tennessee appeals judges say it's OK to make creepy videos of women without their consent

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. – Three judges – all men – wrote three separate but nearly identical opinions concluding it's not a crime in Tennessee to film fully clothed women without their consent if they're in public.

The issue arose in the case of an admitted sexual deviant who was convicted of unlawful photography and admitted he stalked women in retail stores and filmed their "private areas" for sexual gratification.

Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Judges D. Kelly Thomas Jr., James Curwood Witt Jr. and Thomas T. Woodall collectively and separately tossed out unlawful photography convictions against the Sullivan County man, who has a history of public indecency charges.

In three separate opinions, the trio reach the same conclusion: No one has a right to expect privacy in the digital age.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/tennessee-appeals-judges-say-it-s-ok-to-make-creepy-videos-of-women-without-their-consent/ar-BB13UZqP?li=BBnbcA1

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tennessee appeals judges say it's OK to make creepy videos of women without their consent (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2020 OP
someone should have asked the judges if they Ilsa May 2020 #1
time to make creepy videos about 3 particular appeals judges nt msongs May 2020 #2
They could have at least posted a pic of this guy. Lars39 May 2020 #3
unfortunately qazplm135 May 2020 #4
Outlawing "upskirt" shots would doom FOX News. Midnight Writer May 2020 #5
I don't know how you can write a law that excludes his photography dsc May 2020 #6

qazplm135

(7,447 posts)
4. unfortunately
Mon May 11, 2020, 09:39 PM
May 2020

it's difficult to cull out a crime that wouldn't require CCTV or security cameras or really anyone filming in a public place to get permission from every person who appeared in front of their camera.

I would think however that standard stalking rules could apply, and I'd probably hold the store liable if there's a guy running around doing this and they aren't addressing it quickly.

dsc

(52,157 posts)
6. I don't know how you can write a law that excludes his photography
Mon May 11, 2020, 09:58 PM
May 2020

but permits store cameras. He will be serving time (honestly I think about the same amount) for his sexual assault of one of the women who were photographed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tennessee appeals judges ...