HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Did Gorsuch just say that...

Tue May 12, 2020, 10:12 AM

Did Gorsuch just say that normally subpoenas are used to investigate crimes?

Is that true?

8 replies, 1081 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply Did Gorsuch just say that normally subpoenas are used to investigate crimes? (Original post)
malaise May 2020 OP
Loki Liesmith May 2020 #1
gademocrat7 May 2020 #2
malaise May 2020 #3
gademocrat7 May 2020 #4
TruckFump May 2020 #5
malaise May 2020 #6
TruckFump May 2020 #7
malaise May 2020 #8

Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 10:16 AM

1. Doug Letter is a garbage litigator

Hes crumpling under this line of questioning.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 10:19 AM

2. According to my attorney husband

Not true. Any kind of hearing can have subpoenas.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gademocrat7 (Reply #2)

Tue May 12, 2020, 10:19 AM

3. That was my thinking

Thanks

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #3)

Tue May 12, 2020, 10:23 AM

4. You are welcome.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 10:25 AM

5. I do PI cases and have done criminal defense.

Re PI: I get a TON of SDTs for records in my office on a daily basis.

IMO, tho I did crim defense a VERY long time ago, the subpoenas were more directed to specifics because of Const issues -- esp re the Bill of Rights.

IMO, PI ones are more shot gun.
This is the DU member formerly known as TruckFump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TruckFump (Reply #5)

Tue May 12, 2020, 10:36 AM

6. Thanks

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to malaise (Reply #6)

Tue May 12, 2020, 10:41 AM

7. Hey, anything for you!

I am finding the discussion in SCOTUS re SDTs about Trump interesting. BS on the side of Trump, but interesting to watch the spin. IMO, the RWs will prevail.

This is the DU member formerly known as TruckFump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TruckFump (Reply #7)

Tue May 12, 2020, 10:44 AM

8. Awwwwwwwwwww

Fascinating - don't know who will prevail yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread