Tue May 12, 2020, 10:39 AM
38 replies, 3291 views
 38 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 Think we just lost the Supreme Court case (Original post) |
Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | OP |
| a kennedy | May 2020 | #1 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #3 | |
| onecaliberal | May 2020 | #12 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #19 | |
| onecaliberal | May 2020 | #25 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #2 | |
| TruckFump | May 2020 | #5 | |
| BComplex | May 2020 | #15 | |
| jimfields33 | May 2020 | #4 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #7 | |
| jimfields33 | May 2020 | #13 | |
| SoonerPride | May 2020 | #6 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #14 | |
| SoonerPride | May 2020 | #20 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #22 | |
| Mike 03 | May 2020 | #8 | |
| idziak4ever1234 | May 2020 | #9 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #16 | |
| malaise | May 2020 | #10 | |
| Iliyah | May 2020 | #11 | |
| Takket | May 2020 | #17 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #24 | |
| kentuck | May 2020 | #18 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #27 | |
| BComplex | May 2020 | #21 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #23 | |
| BComplex | May 2020 | #26 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #28 | |
| Amishman | May 2020 | #30 | |
| qazplm135 | May 2020 | #29 | |
| rusty fender | May 2020 | #31 | |
| duforsure | May 2020 | #32 | |
| grantcart | May 2020 | #33 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #34 | |
| grantcart | May 2020 | #35 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #38 | |
| octoberlib | May 2020 | #36 | |
| Loki Liesmith | May 2020 | #37 |
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:40 AM
a kennedy (22,049 posts)
1. Justice Beer Man???
|
Will NEVER forget “I like beer”.
 Loser. Ugh indeed.  |
Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #3)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:44 AM
onecaliberal (19,606 posts)
12. The fucking precedent should save our side. I'm sick of republicans acting like
Response to onecaliberal (Reply #12)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:46 AM
19. What we are tired of is not a good court argument
Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #19)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:53 AM
onecaliberal (19,606 posts)
25. of course.
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:40 AM
2. Either Roberts saves the day by inventing a limiting principle or we are screwed.
Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #2)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:42 AM
TruckFump (3,950 posts)
5. Agree. EOM
|
This is the DU member formerly known as TruckFump.
|
Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #2)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:45 AM
BComplex (5,293 posts)
15. Roberts has been carrying trumps water all day.
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:41 AM
4. Maybe RBG or another liberal can clean it up by asking again another way but
Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #7)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:44 AM
13. Damn. Thanks for keeping us informed on what is going on.
 |
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:43 AM
SoonerPride (9,463 posts)
6. Why would there need to be a limiting principle?
Response to SoonerPride (Reply #6)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:45 AM
14. Both conservative and liberal justices wanted one because
Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #14)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:47 AM
SoonerPride (9,463 posts)
20. Isn't that for SCOTUS to decide anyway?
Response to SoonerPride (Reply #20)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:50 AM
22. They could but Letter didn't argue that
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:43 AM
Mike 03 (16,420 posts)
8. Maybe I misheard, but Breyer didn't sound very happy with the
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:43 AM
9. This needs to go the House's way or
Response to idziak4ever1234 (Reply #9)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:45 AM
16. The hope is Roberts recognizes this
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:43 AM
10. Aren't there three cases? n/t
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:44 AM
11. A decision could come months later . . .
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:46 AM
Takket (13,964 posts)
17. What is a limiting principle?
Response to Takket (Reply #17)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:53 AM
24. Guideline that constrains a governmental power
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:46 AM
kentuck (100,929 posts)
18. Where did they get that guy? Letter?
Response to kentuck (Reply #18)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:54 AM
27. Republicans have invested heavily in grooming shark lawyers
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:50 AM
BComplex (5,293 posts)
21. Justice Ginsberg is tired, and sounding like it.
Response to BComplex (Reply #21)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:52 AM
23. I still think Roberts, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch could go our way
Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #23)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:53 AM
BComplex (5,293 posts)
26. I don't agree, but I hope you're right.
Response to BComplex (Reply #26)
Tue May 12, 2020, 10:55 AM
28. Oh at this point I think your belief is more likely
Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #23)
Tue May 12, 2020, 11:53 AM
30. gorsuch could definitely go our way
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 11:47 AM
29. Oral arguments don't matter much
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 11:58 AM
rusty fender (3,185 posts)
31. Don't get you panties in a bunch
|
We lost it in 2016
 This is the DU member formerly known as rusty fender.
|
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 12:00 PM
32. Would this hearing be different
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 12:07 PM
grantcart (51,194 posts)
33. We are listening to different hearings
Response to Loki Liesmith (Reply #34)
Tue May 12, 2020, 12:19 PM
grantcart (51,194 posts)
35. No but if you no longer agree with this OP you should delete it
Response to grantcart (Reply #35)
Tue May 12, 2020, 02:39 PM
38. But I don't disagree with this post
Response to Loki Liesmith (Original post)
Tue May 12, 2020, 12:56 PM
octoberlib (13,679 posts)
36. Thank god for Carey Dunne.
|
This is the DU member formerly known as octoberlib.
|
Response to octoberlib (Reply #36)
Tue May 12, 2020, 02:31 PM
37. Yeah that part of the case was brilliant.
