HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » For those of us who don't...

Tue May 12, 2020, 11:24 AM

For those of us who don't want to pick through tweets regarding RGB/Whitewater references at SCOTUS

RBG Immediately Went There, Asked Trump Lawyer How Whitewater and Watergate Were Different from Tax Return Case
Colin Kalmbacher

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/rbg-immediately-went-there-asked-trump-lawyer-how-whitewater-and-watergate-were-different-from-tax-return-case/ar-BB13YjQj

<snip>

“Counsel, in so many of these prior cases, there was a cooperation,” Ginsburg began. “For example: tax returns. Every president voluntarily turned over his tax returns. So, it gets to be a pitched battle because President Trump is the first one to refuse to do that.”

The famed liberal justice continued:

Initially, [Trump] said because of an audit was ongoing. Now it seems to be broader than that. But the aura of this case is really: “Sauce for the goose that serves the gander as well.” So, how do you distinguish, say, Whitewater when President Clinton’s personal records were subpoenaed from his accountant or even Hillary Clinton‘s law firm billing records were subpoenaed. It seems that in prior cases–you say this one is one-of-a-kind–but it seems that in prior cases there was a much greater collision of interests. [Indistinguishable] the Nixon tapes. How do you distinguish all of those cases, Watergate, Whitewater, the Nixon tapes case, the Paula Jones case?

“Well, your honor, we distinct them in a number of ways,” Trump’s attorney Patrick Strawbridge responded. “With respect to Watergate and Whitewater, obviously, those are cases of relatively recent vintage. And in separation of powers disputes, this court has generally–such as in Noel Canning–looked back for a much longer precedent for the type of issue that needs to be decided with examples of the encroachment on the separation of powers. And the recent examples–there are just a handful of them that the House identifies–are too recent under that stricture, as the court recognized in Southwest General.”

<snip>

Principal Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall, representing Trump as a government official, made a separate attempt to protect Trump’s tax returns by asserting that sitting presidents are held to a different legal standard.

“How’d that work out in the Paula Jones case?” Ginsburg quipped.

13 replies, 2755 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 13 replies Author Time Post
Reply For those of us who don't want to pick through tweets regarding RGB/Whitewater references at SCOTUS (Original post)
marble falls May 2020 OP
Eliot Rosewater May 2020 #1
CurtEastPoint May 2020 #2
WhiteTara May 2020 #3
NBachers May 2020 #11
CrispyQ May 2020 #4
ThoughtCriminal May 2020 #5
marble falls May 2020 #6
DENVERPOPS May 2020 #7
Name removed May 2020 #8
alwaysinasnit May 2020 #9
lagomorph777 May 2020 #10
Roy Rolling May 2020 #12
Gothmog May 2020 #13

Response to marble falls (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 11:26 AM

1. Bless her, genius. SC is gone, over. 5 traitors are on the SC and they will get women next.

Women and doctors.

We are at war, we still havent figured it out yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 11:26 AM

2. Sorry. What? "we distinct them..." That's equivalent to "we gorgeous them." It's a fucking

adjective. He really said that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CurtEastPoint (Reply #2)

Tue May 12, 2020, 11:40 AM

3. they care so little, they don't bother

to use English as we know it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CurtEastPoint (Reply #2)

Tue May 12, 2020, 02:14 PM

11. That distincts to high heaven, doesn't it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 11:52 AM

4. "We distinct them..."



You just know this is the same quality of justices being confirmed for lifetime positions in our courts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 11:58 AM

5. I'm trying to make some sense out of Strawbridge's reply

The best translation I can come up with is "Yargle bargle"."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ThoughtCriminal (Reply #5)

Tue May 12, 2020, 12:45 PM

6. He said just that earlier to Thomas who shook his head sagely. Kavenaugh pulled a pop top ...

and bonged a Spudweizer. He burped and Strawbridge beamed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 01:23 PM

7. Okay, how about looking far back

at the Tea Pot Dome Scandal........and other corrupt politicians.......

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Original post)


Response to marble falls (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 01:43 PM

9. K&R Thanks for posting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 01:56 PM

10. Thanks for pulling this from the Twit world into real life!

RBG kicks ASS!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 02:15 PM

12. He was crushed

Why? He answered in gibberish, “your honor, we distinct them...“

Calm response would be, “Your Honor, we distinguish them...”

He’s rattled and has fear in his mind.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to marble falls (Original post)

Tue May 12, 2020, 05:27 PM

13. RBG is amazing

This is the DU member formerly known as Gothmog.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread