General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDear Bill Barr, you've argued that the president can do whatever he wants and cannot be investigated
Well then as president, Obama was well within his powers to investigate Trump and Flynn.
You can't have it both ways Mr. Barr.
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)you have to read the fine print
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)DEMOCRATIC presidents are held to a different standard.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)Will not apply to President Biden?
Come on. They've bought a Supreme Court just to be able to dictate that to the masses.
Chainfire
(17,458 posts)Barr will argue, "that was then, this is now."
Baitball Blogger
(46,676 posts)Did Obama call for an investigation of Trump and Flynn? Or were the investigations part of a independent non-partisan agency, back when the Department of Justice, the FBI and the CIA were independent non-partisan agencies?
Yavin4
(35,420 posts)at face value, then Obama was well within his rights as president to investigate anyone he wants. A president is above scrutiny and being indicted.
If Trump's request that Ukraine investigate Biden was legal, so is Obama's supposed investigation of Flynn.
0rganism
(23,920 posts)looks to me like the operating precedent will be IOKIYAR
jayfish
(10,037 posts)between President Clinton and AG Lynch. Not that there was anything nefarious about it in the first place. Now it's certainly beyond reproach.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)* Futurama
Collimator
(1,639 posts). . .But if it shuts some folk's mouths for a few seconds while I can make my escape from their presence, then I'm using it.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)BadgerMom
(2,770 posts)-except in front of this Supreme Court.
LymphocyteLover
(5,636 posts)IOKIYAR-- it's OK if you're a republican, it's always OK if you're a republican
warmfeet
(3,321 posts)If you do not agree, you may have to fight, and not with words on the internet.