U.S. judge puts Justice Department's move to drop charges against Michael Flynn on hold

[spanone]

May 12, 2020 at 7:39 p.m. CDT

A U.S. judge put on hold the Justice Department’s move to drop charges against Michael Flynn, saying he expects independent groups and legal experts to argue against the bid to exonerate President Trump’s former national security adviser of lying to the FBI.

.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan said in an order Tuesday that he expects individuals and organizations will seek to intervene in the politically charged case. Having others weigh in could preface more aggressive steps that the federal judge in Washington could take, including — as many outside observers have called for — holding a hearing to consider what to do.

Sullivan’s order came after the government took the highly irregular step Thursday of reversing its stance on upholding Flynn’s guilty plea.

The action by Sullivan, a veteran 72-year-old jurist with a national reputation for advocating defendants’ rights to full government disclosure of evidence, appears to rule out immediate action on the Justice Department’s decision to reverse course and throw out Flynn’s December 2017 guilty plea.

**PayWall** https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/us-judge-puts-on-hold-justice-dept-move-to-dismiss-michael-flynns-guilty-plea-to-hear-outside-groups-challenges/2020/05/12/2fb4e356-949d-11ea-82b4-c8db161ff6e5_story.html

[Hermit-The-Prog]

1. I guess this means it's still not too late to say, "LOCK HIM UP!"

[Gothmog]

2. This means that parties other than the DOJ and Flynn will get to argue

Link to tweet

[Solomon]

3. Yep. That's what I was worried about. That there would be no one to argue

on behalf of justice. That the judge would be on his own with no help.

Now he won't be able to read all the briefs. Good move on his part.