General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'We're asking for temporary presidential immunity,' Trump lawyer Jay Sekulow says
They'd said it before, but President Donald Trump's attorney put it more bluntly than ever:
"We're asking for temporary presidential immunity," Jay Sekulow told the Supreme Court Tuesday.
"Temporary presidential immunity," in the way the President's lawyers describe it, would mean that Trump (or whomever is president at the time) couldn't be investigated or prosecuted while holding the office of President. No subpoenas, no testimony, no indictments, if investigators sought those.
"Criminal process targeting the President" violates the Constitution, Sekulow said.
Justice Elena Kagan called out the argument, in which Sekulow was steadfast Tuesday.
"He's the President," Sekulow responded.
Kagan had a retort: "The President isn't above the law."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/were-asking-for-temporary-presidential-immunity-trump-lawyer-jay-sekulow-says/ar-BB13ZqY4?li=BBnb7Kz
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)in office wasn't called out from the get-go. It seemed that everyone accepted that as fact and didn't argue the case. Maybe I missed it, but the Democrats should have at least called Barr on his interpretation.
2naSalit
(86,610 posts)They are asking for SCOTUS to change the Constitution for something new that even they recognize doesn't really exist already though they are also arguing that it does.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)I'm on the fence about a sitting president being indicted.
intrepidity
(7,296 posts)Or, can only former presidents be impeached otherwise?
Or, can impeachment occur without an investigation?
That's the rabbit hole right there.
Girard442
(6,071 posts)Don't say impeachment. How could anyone investigate to know if impeachment is warranted?
procon
(15,805 posts)Volaris
(10,271 posts)dawg day
(7,947 posts)for only when Trump is president.
After that, he wants no immunity.