General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMan Pointed Gun at Pregnant Smoker
Cops: Man Pointed Gun at Pregnant Smoker
(Newser) Nothing says, "I care about your baby's health" like firearms. A Washington state man was arrested this week, after he allegedly pulled a gun on a smoking pregnant woman. Justin Dain Palmer was driving in his pickup truck when he saw the 28-year-old mom-to-be walking down the street and puffing away around noon on Wednesday, the Bellingham Herald reports. Police say he stopped and yelled out the window, "Who the heck smokes when they're pregnant?"
"I do," the woman replied. A testy exchange ensued, during which the woman alleges that Palmer pulled out a gun and pointed it at her. He eventually drove away without firing, however, and the woman called 911. When police caught up with Palmer, he admitted to confronting the woman, but denied brandishing the weapon. When police searched his truck, they found two Glock semiautomatic .45-caliber handguns, and booked him.
http://www.newser.com/story/154052/cops-man-pointed-gun-at-pregnant-smoker.html?utm_source=part&utm_medium=united
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Scairp
(2,749 posts)THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SMOKING. Smoking was HIS excuse for pointing a gun at a person on the street, and it was just an excuse. He wasn't some do-gooder gone too far, he's a dangerous freak with guns driving around and pointing them at people for whatever reason. It is not about smoking in any way, form or fashion. Ahhhhh!!!!!
MADem
(135,425 posts)Some fat people look pregnant. Some people can have a tumor or some other issue (swollen liver, for example) that makes them look pregnant.
I go by the "I'm not bringing it up unless you do" rule. Keeps me out of trouble!
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)
Gold Metal Flake
(13,805 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)That graphic is hilarious!!! Words to live by...
Number_9
(32 posts)I don't ask a woman about her pregnancy unless I see a baby actively exiting the vehicle...
RB TexLa
(17,003 posts)wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)It's none of your business.
Also, if she's not pregnant, you just pointed out that she's fat.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)nuts.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)deaniac21
(6,747 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)to the baby by smoking while pregnant.
This guy shouldn't be running around pointing guns at people.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Incitatus
(5,317 posts)For the baby
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)this type of extreme stress.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Iris
(16,872 posts)more stress than cutting back. The man had no business getting into the woman's face simply because she was pregnant.
liberalhistorian
(20,905 posts)Smoking while pregnant is absolutely horrendous for the baby, just as it's bad for the children of smokers. As an adult, she has the right to make the choice to fuck up her own health if she wants, but she has no right whatsoever to make that choice for the innocent baby.
I certainly don't agree with the man's methods or his ridiculous usage of a gun and he deserves to be arrested and prosecuted. But she isn't really much better, frankly, and is being terribly selfish and irresponsible.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)liberalhistorian
(20,905 posts)aware of just how powerful the addiction is. But you don't have the right to use that to harm your own child. You have the right to make your own decision, as an adult, regardless of the consequences to your health, but you do not have the right to make that decision for your child and to endanger his or her health.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)That's the disease of the addiction.
I smoked through 3 pregnancies. I knew it wasn't good, but the addiction was just too strong for me. I managed to quit over 5 years ago.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)my niece to pop. She decided to smoke drink and drug because 'it makes the baby smaller and it doesn't hurt as much.'
She should be stung up. Anyone who smokes during pregnancy is practicing child abuse in my opinion and the statistics out there back it up. I would think this would be one thing about this all would agree about. What goes into a pg woman goes through the baby.
d_r
(6,908 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Guaranteed she's going to at least neglect and emotionally abuse that child if not outright physically abuse it.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)so if you are an addict any behavior you do is excusable because of your addiction? Not buying that for a second.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)Addiction is still a disease and for some people it's overpowering. I'm not justifying it. I'm telling you how it is. The good old "will power" speech doesn't cut it with addicts.
I've come down hard on smokers in the past, but I know first hand of how big of a beast it is to overcome. I do think if I can quit, anyone can. But I also know that it's harder for some than it is for others.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)and smoking while pregnant is abuse. I do not know how you can complain about people "coming down on her". I would have no more sympathy for a heroin addict.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)The addiction was too strong and I didn't know how to live without it. That's the case with a lot of addicts. It's not knowing how to live without it. You can't imagine life without it. That's how powerful it is.
I understand it. That's why I can complain about people coming down on her. Addiction is still a disease and your sentiment does nothing to help her or people like her.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)All I can say is that not everyone believes addiction is a disease (only 20% of physicians share this belief). I guess I am not really interested in "helping" her, I am more interested in stopping her from hurting her baby.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)I do think we can agree that she would have to want to be helped. She'd have to want to make an honest attempt at quitting. Sometimes people will just say no, they don't want to quit. I've seen that a lot in the medical field. That's not just the addiction talking either.
I also think it would help if there were more tools to help her quit such as access to free medication and support groups. I don't feel enough is done to give addicts of any stripe the tools they need.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)You know, intentions count.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Cerridwen
(13,262 posts)"not everyone believes addiction is a disease (only 20% of physicians share this belief).
Do you have a reliable link for that statistic about physicians' beliefs about medical conditions such as addiction? I can't seem to find it.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)". A survey of physicians reported at that conference found that 80 percent of responding doctors perceived alcoholism as simply bad behavior"
Some links
http://www2.potsdam.edu/hansondj/Controversies/Is-Alcoholism-a-Disease.html
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=117682&page=1#.UFRkbEWe7Kc
http://www.soberforever.net/disease-theory-alcoholism.cfm
Iris
(16,872 posts)Some studies?
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Either its a woman's body and her choice ... or its not...?
ecstatic
(35,075 posts)my take is that once a woman decides to go through with a pregnancy, there are certain responsibilities that are involved. Just as with any other commitment one might make.
A person who doesn't understand that would probably be better off ending the pregnancy.
It's nice that people survived drinking and smoking, but that doesn't make it right. We can't pick and choose which science we'll accept.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Smoking is harmful to all people. I believe, on a personal level, no one should smoke. i am not a fan of alcohol consumption, either.
I wish all people (including myself) made sound judgments ... they don't ... Women are not a class of people that surrender their autonomy based on their reproductive status.
An acquaintance is in the hospital (as I type) she and her baby are suffering dangerous and ill effects due to her obesity ... last I heard (yesterday afternoon) "they" were going to have to take the baby two months early (likely today) ... the consequences of her behavior (leading to morbid obesity) are presenting dire consequences for her and the baby. It is well known that an obese mother produces a high risk pregnancy .... would you stand by your statement "A person who doesn't understand that would probably be better off ending the pregnancy" ...?
at what point does a woman surrender her autonomy if she becomes pregnant?
I see these arguments validating the antichoicers arguments. If it is not her body and her choice ... then it is not.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Either we accept science or we don't.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)... or did I misinterpret the response ... are you suggesting that pregnant women not engage in activities that increase carbon emmisions (further surrendering her autonomy)?
The pro-choice stance: Its her body her choice ... this is a "topic at hand" appropriate statement .... where do you weigh in on this?
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)once she decides to do it, she has an obligation to the health and welfare of that child. If you are trying to tell me that a woman who plans on carrying a child to term can drink, do drugs, basically whatever and it is all okay because it is HER body, I don't have a whole lot to say to you.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)There have been cases where women have been incarcerated for the duration of their pregnancies ...good idea? What do we do with women that make poor choices? Do we create a second set of laws for women?
Please don't limit yourself to the things that come to YOUR mind as abhorrent ... what about obesity .... women that are anorexic .... women in "high risk" professions ... throw women in abusive relationships in (pregnancy is a very dangerous time for these women and their unborn children).
I am not a fan of smoking, drinking or drug use by people.
I am the mother of three. I have been granted a life that allowed me to make "wise and informed" decisions while pregnant. I am sure that by even your standards I made only "good" choices. For this I am grateful .... not sanctimonious or self righteous.
I prefer to continue to provide education and support to all ... thereby improving the ability of people 9including pregnant women) to make sound choices.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)Let's throw logic out the window and play with THEORY. Our country does not work that way, and thank God we have a judicial system that actually looks at each case on its own merit.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)That's part of THE CHOICE.
It's not "ooooh I'm going to have something to play with and dress up in a few months and until then I'm going to PAAARTAAYYY!!
ummm...No.
Anything legal to prevent these women from that behavior is out of the question, of course.
Pulling a gun on this woman was wrong, of course.
But I have no problem at all with public shunning and shaming.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Up-thread I share the story of an acquaintance named Katie:
"An acquaintance is in the hospital (as I type) she and her baby are suffering dangerous and ill effects due to her obesity ... last I heard (yesterday afternoon) "they" were going to have to take the baby two months early (likely today) ... the consequences of her behavior (leading to morbid obesity) are presenting dire consequences for her and the baby. It is well known that an obese mother produces a high risk pregnancy " .... would you stand by your statement "But I have no problem at all with public shunning and shaming"
I prefer education and support.
The young woman I mention is a loving, reasonably intelligent, lovely young woman ... she also started her pregnancy at least 100 pounds over weight and gained 20-30 pounds during her 32 weeks of pregnancy. it really would have been been a wiser choice for her to have lost at least 100 pounds prior to becoming pregnant ... her obesity put her and her unborn child at great risk. The risk is immediate and severe (sadly at this moment very severe). The last damn thing i would do is shame her or someone like her.
I am the mother of three I did not engage in what are typically thought of as high risk behaviors while pregnant (i even gave up my true love: black coffee), I was not then and am not now obese ... I was fortunate to be able to make the choices I did. I am not shunning or shaming anyone, folk tend to make the best choices they are capable of ... i prefer to educate folk so they have the best info on which to make their choices.
To the argument at hand
It is either her body/ her choice or it is not.
If the argument is soley based on "smoking' ... I am out or the conversation. smoking is 'bad" for all people and I prefer not to enter in to 'smoking' threads.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)I don't see it as black and white, cut and dry. Sorry, I don't want to see abortions made illegal but I don't ever, and will never agree that as long as that fetus is in that woman's body, anything she chooses to do to it is okay. By your logic she could have that baby lobotomized in the womb because she felt like it and its all good.
I also do not believe that "People make the best choices they are capable of", I think, in general, people make the choice that offers the path of least resistance, but often, they are capable of much more.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)This is a poster who would actually believe the mother has a right to abort 2 weeks before the child is to be born because other plans came up for that weekend.
This is the type of person whose thought processes give the people trying to take real choice away their power.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I am a poster that understands that women in the generation immediately preceding mine were forced to seek abortions using back alley abortionists, drugs (poisons) and "coat hangers" ... I understand that there are women seeking these same remedies. I am the kind of poster that understands that the same issues you bring up would be used to prosecute these women for murder.
I am the kind of poster whose children recognize the sacrifices i have made in life for them ... they are aware that have have and always will be my first priority (i am very lucky that they recognize and understand this).
I am the kind of poster that worked as an RN prior to their birth and was afforded the opportunity to stay at home and make them my sole focus after their birth. my nursing career (9hospice) allowed me to see all people as deeply flawed and frail ... but most, doing the best they can. I understand that everyone makes poor choices at some time ... I also have compassion when they are sometimes confronted with dire consequences.
I am the kind of poster that volunteers with homeless and indigent and understands that choices aren't as clear cut for some as they are for other's.
Most of all I am the kind of poster that is enraged that anyone would would read a post or thread about some jack ass threatening an other human being with a gun (because that human was pregnant and a smoker) and focus on the fact that the human (that happened to be pregnant) engaged in a legal behavior they disagreed with.
I am the kind of poster, that doesn't drink, smoke or "do" any recreational drugs ... I do love and am addicted to coffee (which I happened to give up each time I was pregnant) ... I am also a poster that understands that some folk are not so lucky!
On edit: I wonder why you chose to attack the character of someone you don't know. We all make assumptions about folk we interact with here. i certainly do the same. my assumption about you is that you care about the welfare of children but are not able or willing to follow the end result which would inevitably lead to the loss of a woman's right to control her own body ... if the fetus is a separate human, and the mother is responsible for the health and well being of this separate and distinct individual ... why isn't abortion murder.
SOS
(7,048 posts)Both my parents and my wife's parents smoked during pregnancy.
All four of them.
The notion that they "abused" us is sickening.
It is what it is.
So glad that we are now middle-aged, independent and without children, so we don't have
to participate in this twisted modern society.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)55 years ago no one knew the consequences of smoking, now they do. Apples and oranges.
Laurajr
(223 posts)Of smoking and hid it...but that's a different issue. Obviously this girl was not that into being pregnant if she was she would have done anything to protect that baby. Quitting smoking takes desire and not too much more than that...I've quit so I do have some clue.
Drahthaardogs
(6,843 posts)You have a responsibility to attempt to take care of that baby, in the womb included. I wonder if the woman had anxiety problems if the posters here would advocate her taking Thalidomide?
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)After all, it's all about protecting the fetus. Who cares about the right of the woman to control her own body. In fact, we should jail all pregnant women until they give birth just to make sure they behave only in ways that don't harm the fetus.
it's a slippery fucking slope people.
Either you believe a woman has the right to control her own body, or you do not.
Iris
(16,872 posts)to the mother and, as a result, more harm to the child.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Scairp
(2,749 posts)I need divine help right now. This incident has fuck all to do with SMOKING. It's about a man with guns pointing them at people walking down the street. Who cares what HIS reasons were? He's dangerous. Maybe he's done this before and no one was able to get his license number and get him caught but even if he has never done it, so what? He's started it and he has to go to prison.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)FFS
Scairp
(2,749 posts)Let me try to help you-THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SMOKING. Are you somewhat clearer now? This is about a freak pointing a gun at someone on a public street. His reasons are irrelevant. I'm having a running verbal battle with some very dimwitted persons over at HuffPo and I've gotten pretty pissed off with the victim blaming, so please cut it out.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)Control-Z
(15,686 posts)Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)
Will you just take it easy, man?
Initech
(108,783 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)targeting them for 'punishment'.
the targeting of smokers is all about justification for taxing them to death.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)aren't what's killing them.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)6%+ of RI & Maine's, etc. (2001 figures, likely higher today with the budget crises. Certainly higher in my state, which has added at least 6 rounds of tobacco taxes since 2001).
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:I4YivoHb83IJ:dor.wa.gov/content/aboutus/statisticsandreports/WAtaxstudy/Tobacco%2520_Alcohol_9-13-02.pdf+washington+state+tobacco+taxes+fund+percent+budget&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESiae-m1H1aNmrxogF2OqpTlEPbcpBGP2GrXXop03O1oxndqqXt0Fln_TQncZbfOZTvTL5lJ1BsW9LdW4-HVc-db0JtfYeinyh4oL4Nz5xAS5kPGOuxJZulPkNNgCpFoSqi7B2CU&sig=AHIEtbS7a_WC-KdiRE79X32fINszKa9uPQ
Regressive taxes, falling most heavily on the poor. Accepted because of the demonization of smokers. Not to mention higher insurance rates, poorer job prospects (as many workplaces discriminate against smokers), and a general intolerance & denigration in the culture.
I'm sure you have all sorts of research rationalizing & justifying it -- smokers are costing us money, smokers are responsible for the high cost of health care, blah blah --
But that's all it is, blah blah. As the smoking habit moved from the upper classes to the lower, smoking became a targeted behavior, pure & simple.
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Simply stop smoking
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)it's the american way to butt into poorer people's business & treat them like they're defective, to tax them up the ass for their minor vices while simultaneously telling them they don't pay taxes and are useless eaters who cost the yuppies money.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Dunh dun DUUUUUNH!
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)even if they think she is wrong headed to smoke. As a matter of fact I'd say 99.9999% wouldn't.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)That's just insane.
Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)So you're safe.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)Chorophyll
(5,179 posts)and allows complete f*cking morans to keep semiautomatic handguns around like they're spare socks.
Culture of Life!
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)but whether or not anyone has the right to pull a gun on someone doing something the gun-puller thinks is objectionable. To which the answer is: NO! NEVER!
Maybe if your own personal life is in danger is it justified to pull a gun, but just on someone walking down the street? The pregnant part absolutely doesn't matter. Nor does the smoking part, since smoking is still legal.
For the record, I'm one of the anti-smoking Nazis, and if I saw this woman I would not even say anything to her, because as wrong as I think she is to smoke while pregnant, it is simply none of my business that she does so.
spelling correction on edit.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)You are threatening your baby, so I am justified in threatening both... because I am pro-life and am deeply concerned about prenatal care for babies.
BarackTheVote
(938 posts)WTF? Ridiculous.
Or was this a Fight Club kind of thing: "I'm gonna keep an eye on you, girl, and if you're still smoking when this baby's born, you will be dead." Either way, f'k this guy.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Thank You! I was wondering when somebody was going to call that out.
But, I guess guns are cooler than cigarettes where she lives.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Why not just lock women up until they give birth...if they struggle to much you can just strap them down.
I suggest the Anti-choice crowd takes all their fucking money and invest it in incubators. Machines don't have that pesky free will and choice crap to have to deal with, right?
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)in a restaurant. "You should be drinking MILK". Well, besides I don't like milk, it turned out my daughter was/is severely allergic to dairy. I myself couldn't have dairy when she nursed.
People need to mind their own damned business.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)cherish44
(2,566 posts)While neither are good, I think the baby stands a much better chance of survival gestating in a woman who smokes than in a dead one.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I am sure she was addicted before getting pregnant. What is his excuse.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)But when I was pregnant, cigarettes made me sick. That's how I knew I was pregnant the second time. I could not even stand to look at a cigarette without getting nauseous. But unforunately, after each child's birth I started to smoke again to lose the baby weight.
ejpoeta
(8,933 posts)I didn't know I was pregnant at the time. I didn't smoke during my pregnancy because of that and also I didn't want to expose my daughter to that. She loves hearing how she helped me quit smoking. But I did smoke when I went back to work on breaks. I figured if I didnt' buy a pack of cigarettes i was ok. I just bummed them off others. Then I decided I had to choose. So I quit going outside during break and stopped before I got addicted again.
I figure I wasn't a REAL smoker because I could only smoke certain cigarettes. My husband... now he was a real addict. It took him several attempts to finally quit. He quit for a year and then started again. I wanted to beat him! But he finally quit with the help of Chantix and has been smoke free for four years now. I am so proud of him.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Iris
(16,872 posts)Strangers need not involve themselves in these matters.
Initech
(108,783 posts)Alduin
(501 posts)I don't think she should have a gun pulled on her, but scientific evidence shows that smoking while pregnant can be damaging to the fetus's health.
shintao
(487 posts)Alduin
(501 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)She can also drink. Again not the best idea, BUT it is still her body, her child, her choice.
Free will at work.
maxsolomon
(38,729 posts)but it is very rare.
my mom smoked, lightly, while pregnant with me, in the early 60s. i am not damaged that i can tell. tobacco isn't crack.
millions of children have been born, undamaged, to mothers who not only smoked tobacco, but DRANK ALCOHOL, moderately, while pregnant. fetal alcohol syndrome doesn't happen because you have one sip of pinot grigio.
americans are binary: its either on or off, black or white. you're either a 100% teetotaler during pregnancy, or you're a murderer. the jackhole in this story probably felt he was going to save the baby.
johnnie
(23,616 posts)My mother smoked while pregnant with me. After close to 50 years I'm waiting for this horrendous damage my mother caused me. I'm not saying its a good thing if a woman smokes while pregnant but so many people do have that binary thinking you mention.
So just because your mom smoked doesn't make it okay!
maxsolomon
(38,729 posts)Of course, there is always a risk factor for any behavior, no matter how infinitessimal, it is not zero.
I said that Americans have a tendency to reduce harmful behaviors to black or white decisions. This fine citizen pointed a gun at a woman who didn't submit to his binary standards.
My contention: One cigarette isn't going to give a fetus lung cancer. One glass of Pinot Grigio isn't going to cause Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. I am living proof, as are millions around the globe. Do you know different?
Eye roll & ROFL smilie yourself.
Iris
(16,872 posts)However, she is still a free citizen despite the pregnancy and it is not a stranger's business to tell her what to do. That's between her and her doctor.
ck4829
(37,761 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)She remains a free and autonomous adult ... she has the right to make her own choices .... good or bad, just as every other citizen of the US.
Is it only her body if you are pro-choice AND she conforms to what you decide is a good choice? Clearly we know the anti choicers believe a woman loses her right to make decisions about her own body the moment she has sex.
How do we force a woman to make "good" choices while pregnant? shall we incarcerate her so that she eats appropriately (doesn't gain too much or too little weight), doesn't have a drink? .... perhaps we need to sterilize all addicts (because we know by their addiction they are of poor moral quality by virtue of being an addict).
Sorry folks it is HER body and her choice .... argue that its not just her body ... its the baby .... the same exact argument the anti-choicers make
(sorry this really isn't directed to the OP .... but directed to those that presume a pregnant woman surrenders her autonomy)
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)If it had only happened at the olive garden. Sigh.
Bake
(21,977 posts)But look at all the concern ... some don't know whether to applaud the guy for confronting the SMOKING PREGNANT WOMAN or wring their hands because he had a Glock ...
Bake
boppers
(16,588 posts)We can always speculate...
name not needed
(11,665 posts)wickerwoman
(5,662 posts)But if it's a boy we can still fight about circumcision.
name not needed
(11,665 posts)Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)~snort~
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)Poor baby.. mom is trash.
And the Guy in the truck is a Darwin award waiting to happen.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)boppers
(16,588 posts)Such nice folks, going out of their way to use the 2nd amendment as they see fit.
Whovian
(2,866 posts)Simply because they smoke and they see it as a great evil.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)The Delicate Flowers (AKA Gun Nuts) here in the DU Gun Lobby keep telling us they're safer than unicorns & candy.
boston bean
(36,931 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)'Nothing says, "I care about your baby's health" like firearms'