Wed May 20, 2020, 11:03 AM

Would this, finally, be considered treason?

If, as I suspect, Drumpf is the one who directed Pompeo to set up an arms deal, someone whistle-blowed and the IG learned of it and was commencing an investigation, the importance of this cannot be understated.

No one would have thought this of Pompeo 35 yes ago!. Such a promising young man. Such a bright future. Such honor &, courage. An arms deal with SA now? I can't think of Pompeo as a sellout, I think he was directed by Drumpf to do it.

They needed to keep it quiet and that sure stinks to me. Maybe some money on the side to keep Drumpf's struggling hotels & golf courses afloat? He can't exactly turn to Deutsche Bank this time can he? He has to make the interest payments on his high debt somehow, plus keep the hotels afloat.

IF this were all true, and I have a bad feeling, would this be considered treason by the masses? Finally?

4 replies, 1471 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

4 replies	Author	Time	Post
Would this, finally, be considered treason? (Original post)	donkeypoofed	May 2020	OP
Treason is narrowly defined in the US Constitution.	raging moderate	May 2020	#1
Then I was correct in calling tRUMP, reTHUGS and cultists traitors in 2016 for taking sPUTIN's	abqtommy	May 2020	#4
Technically it's not treason. It's just another item to add to a long list	The Velveteen Ocelot	May 2020	#2
No.	tazkcmo	May 2020	#3

Response to donkeypoofed (Original post)

Wed May 20, 2020, 11:09 AM

raging moderate (3,710 posts)

1. Treason is narrowly defined in the US Constitution.

US Constitution, Article III, Section 3:
"Treason against the United States shall consist ONLY in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."

Reply to this post

Response to raging moderate (Reply #1)

Wed May 20, 2020, 03:30 PM

abqtommy (14,118 posts)