Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBill Barr's prosecutors have have-not-conclusively-established-they-have-acted-properly ...
Last edited Mon Jun 1, 2020, 06:49 PM - Edit history (1)
in-moving-to-dismiss-flynn-case-federal-judge/
On Monday, federal D.C. District Judge Emmet Sullivan filed a response to the writ of mandamus from former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn ordering him to dismiss the charges against him a response that had been ordered by a three-judge panel from the Court of Appeals two weeks ago.
In the response, Sullivan maintained that Attorney General William Barrs prosecutors have not conclusively established that they acted properly in moving to drop the charges against Flynn particularly given the unusual refusal of several prosecutors working on the case to sign the motion to dismiss.
In the response, Sullivan maintained that Attorney General William Barrs prosecutors have not conclusively established that they acted properly in moving to drop the charges against Flynn particularly given the unusual refusal of several prosecutors working on the case to sign the motion to dismiss.
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/bill-barrs-prosecutors-have-not-conclusively-established-they-have-acted-properly-in-moving-to-dismiss-flynn-case-federal-judge/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
16 replies, 3708 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (90)
ReplyReply to this post
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill Barr's prosecutors have have-not-conclusively-established-they-have-acted-properly ... (Original Post)
Zoonart
Jun 2020
OP
Not yet. It isn't a court decision; it's a brief filed on behalf of Judge Sullivan
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2020
#5
So this is not the amicus brief ordered by Sullivan for his trial level determination?
Nevilledog
Jun 2020
#9
Remember when this case, and others related to it, commanded laser focus from political watchers?
BobTheSubgenius
Jun 2020
#13
malaise
(268,976 posts)1. Get thee to the greatest page
This is huge news
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)5. Not yet. It isn't a court decision; it's a brief filed on behalf of Judge Sullivan
to the Court of Appeals arguing that the judge was not required to grant the governments post-plea motion to dismiss. As usual, Raw Story screwed up their headline. Here's the brief: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6934669/Sullivan-Brief-Flynn-2020-06-01.pdf
malaise
(268,976 posts)6. Good point
but still important
fleur-de-lisa
(14,624 posts)2. K&R
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,342 posts)3. the 46 page response (PDF) ...
Hassler
(3,377 posts)7. Sullivan called Flynn a traitor. I knew he wouldn't surrender
To dis-Barr Bill.
bucolic_frolic
(43,148 posts)8. Lots of moving parts
Power, law, norms, judgment, reasoning
Nevilledog
(51,094 posts)9. So this is not the amicus brief ordered by Sullivan for his trial level determination?
Too busy right now to follow up.
elleng
(130,895 posts)10. "have not 'conclusively established' that they 'acted properly' . . .
Headlines easily distort meanings.
Didn't know if it was in the original, but it clearly changes the story.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,563 posts)13. Remember when this case, and others related to it, commanded laser focus from political watchers?
Seems almost quaint now, doesn't it?
sandensea
(21,627 posts)14. Understatement of the century.
Jiminy Crickets.
spanone
(135,830 posts)15. Imagine that?