General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge Raises Suspicions With Appeals Court About DOJ Motives For Dropping Flynn Charges
Lawyers for a federal judge raised suspicions in a court filing Monday about the motives behind the Department of Justices move to drop perjury charges against former national security adviser Michael Flynn.
It is unusual for a criminal defendant to claim innocence and move to withdraw his guilty plea after repeatedly swearing under oath that he committed the crime, noted the brief filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on behalf of U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan, who presided in the Flynn case. It is unprecedented for the DOJ to take action to dismiss a case years after two different federal judges accepted the plea, the brief added.
The unusual developments in this case provide at least a plausible reason to question the bona fides of the governments motion, lawyers argued.
Sullivan should not be required to act as a mere rubber stamp for Attorney General William Barrs strategy, and should be allowed to rule in the case to protect the integrity of the judicial process, the brief warned.
https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/michael-flynn-emmet-sullivan-william-barr-075422698.html
ScratchCat
(1,980 posts)And ask him to explain why HE decided to drop this. Then he can lie or tell the truth to the judge.
crickets
(25,960 posts)Jarqui
(10,122 posts)Sullivan should be allowed to proceed to protect the integrity of his court
We're about to find out if this Appeals court is corrupt too.