General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats Think Officers Policing Protests Need to Identify Themselves. Bill Barr Disagrees.
Dan Friedman
DAN FRIEDMAN
Reporter
Over the past few days, Mother Jones and other media outlets have noted the presence of armed personnel with no visible identification confronting the protests in DC that were sparked by the recent police killing of George Floyd. These officers have consistently said that they are with the Department of Justice or that they are part of the federal government.
The Justice Department has since said these are officers are from Special Operations Control units in the Bureau of Prisonsthat is, officers trained primarily to quell prison riots.
In response, Democrats in both chambers said Wednesday they would introduce legislation requiring uniformed federal officers doing domestic security work to identify what agency or military branch they represent. Several shared a photo I took on Tuesday.
In a letter Thursday to President Donald Trump, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) requested a list of the agencies involved in responding to protests in DC and an explanation of the roles different troops and law enforcement agencies are fulfilling. Pelosi also blasted the deployment of officers without clear identification. The practice of officers operating with full anonymity undermines accountability, ignites government distrust and suspicion, and is counter to the principle of procedural justice and legitimacy during this precarious moment in our nations history, she wrote.
Inae Oh contributed reporting.
https://www.motherjones.com/anti-racism-police-protest/2020/06/democrats-legislation-unidentified-officers-washington/
In the federal system, the agencies dont wear badges with their names and stuff like that, Barr said. I could understand why some of these individuals simply wouldnt want to talk to people about who they are, if that in fact was the case.
Barr declined to elaborate. And Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec and the BOPs press office did not respond to specific questions about the legal authority of BOP in Washington and about the number of officers deployed.
Unsurprisingly, Barrs comments arent going down well with Democratic lawmakers. Rep. Don Beyer (D-Va.), one of the members pushing legislation to require officers identify themselves, tweeted: Last time I checked we dont do secret police in this country.
Salviati
(6,008 posts)I believe it was because they couldn't get their hair cut or nails done?
I bet they're really going to be upset about the jackbooted secret police force, right?
chia
(2,244 posts)Nevilledog
(51,104 posts)crickets
(25,979 posts)leftieNanner
(15,100 posts)But we have photographs of some of their faces. That may help us to identify them and who they work for.
They certainly don't work for us - although we probably fund the payroll.
orwell
(7,773 posts)...We the People and their "representatives" in Congress can go pound sand.
If you haven't noticed, WE RUN THINGS NOW! WE CAN DO WHATEVER THE FUCK WE WANT.
WE CAN TEARGAS PROTESTORS, LIE TO YOUR FACE, AND KILL ANYONE AT WILL!
Now go back to your "Antifa" meetings and let "the adults" take care of the "terrorists."
signed:
...the Chief "law enforcement" officer &
the "law and order" president
hedda_foil
(16,374 posts)This from an article in Political posted above. Prison riot police from Texas!
Should we be grateful that they didn't club and shoot the protesters?
doc03
(35,337 posts)they can't be identified. This is like 1930s Germany. I hate to even think this but that is what may have to happen to wake this country up.
Renew Deal
(81,859 posts)How do they know if it's some unidentified officer or a person playing dress up?