Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,884 posts)
Sat Jun 6, 2020, 09:26 PM Jun 2020

Analysis: White House, Pentagon tensions near breaking point

WASHINGTON (AP) — Tensions between the White House and Pentagon have stretched to near a breaking poin t over President Donald Trump's threat to use military force against street protests triggered by George Floyd's death.

Friction in this relationship, historically, is not unusual. But in recent days, and for the second time in Trump's term, it has raised a prospect of high-level resignations and the risk of lasting damage to the military's reputation.

Calm may return, both in the crisis over Floyd's death and in Pentagon leaders' angst over Trump's threats to use federal troops to put down protesters. But it could leave a residue of resentment and unease about this president's approach to the military, whose leaders welcome his push for bigger budgets but chafe at being seen as political tools.

The nub of the problem is that Trump sees no constraint on his authority to use what he calls the “unlimited power” of the military even against U.S. citizens if he believes it necessary. Military leaders generally take a far different view. They believe that active-duty troops, trained to hunt and kill an enemy, should be used to enforce the law only in the most extreme emergency, such as an attempted actual rebellion. That limit exists, they argue, to keep the public’s trust.

Vincent K. Brooks, a recently retired Army four-star general, says this “sacred trust” has been breached by Trump's threat to commit active-duty troops for law enforcement in states where he deems a governor has not not tough enough against protesters.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/analysis-white-house-pentagon-tensions-near-breaking-point/ar-BB158qcH?li=BBnb7Kz

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Analysis: White House, Pentagon tensions near breaking point (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 OP
then break already. how many illegal orders are those fools going to follow? mopinko Jun 2020 #1
Someone should ask Trump if he would rule out using nuclear weapons in a US city Renew Deal Jun 2020 #2
+1, they already Red Don would nuke a city without question uponit7771 Jun 2020 #4
The truth is that the basic core of Trump's support is pro-fascist... AntiFascist Jun 2020 #3

Renew Deal

(81,854 posts)
2. Someone should ask Trump if he would rule out using nuclear weapons in a US city
Sat Jun 6, 2020, 10:09 PM
Jun 2020

If the police/military couldn't get it under control.

AntiFascist

(12,792 posts)
3. The truth is that the basic core of Trump's support is pro-fascist...
Sat Jun 6, 2020, 10:15 PM
Jun 2020

and they would like to see nothing more than the military used against its liberal enemies.

November cannot come soon enough!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Analysis: White House, Pe...