Did anyone hear (TRMS) attorney interviewed to discuss RESPONSE to RW election suppression efforts

[hlthe2b]

As per usual she gave an excellent, detailed windup to the issues but it ran so long (and left me so mad/dispirited that I was halfway for someone to pass the cyanide capsules), that I missed the segment on what we are going to do about it.

Rachel is good. But damn, I wish she'd get to the point a little sooner.

[trueblue2007]

1. i like her explanations ..... JUST THE WAY SHE DOES THEM. No need to change anything.

[hlthe2b]

2. FIne. But DID YOU HEAR the response to the problem? That is my question

I missed it and she only gave him a couple of minutes after the commercial break after a more than 20-minute wind-up to the problem. She has a habit of doing this. A long detail of the problem and virtually zero time allotted to someone brought on to discuss what is happening to address it.

[empedocles]

3. RM good at those long intro's to bring in people, like my wife, who agree don't

know the details, like DU types tend to.

[hlthe2b]

4. Fine, but I'm looking for ANYONE who heard what the attorney brought on for a few short minutes

to address what is being done about it might have said.

[lordsummerisle]

6. It was more of a general description of the voting problem

despite Rachel having asked him what we can do. He's working on cases at a national level and implied (I thought) that he's got it covered...

[hlthe2b]

8. Thanks.

[SunSeeker]

5. His name is Marc Elias, DNC Legal Advisor on Voter Suppression.

She described him as the "Democratic party's leading election litigator."

[hlthe2b]

7. thanks... I'll research him..

[Laffy Kat]

9. That's always been my only complaint about her.

She repeats the same background over and over again. I end up wanting to stand up and yell, "I get it, already!" There are times I get so frustrated I have to tune out for a few minutes.