Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Me.

(35,454 posts)
Tue Jun 9, 2020, 10:27 PM Jun 2020

"Judge Walton who accused Barr of "distorting" Mueller report demands answers..."

after reading unredacted copy"

"The Mueller report hasn't been in the headlines much in 2020, a year that has found reporters heavily focused on the Ukraine scandal, President Donald Trump's acquittal on two articles of impeachment, the coronavirus pandemic, former Vice President Joe Biden's surge in the Democratic presidential primary and — most recently — the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis on May 25. But the Mueller report is still a compelling read, and a federal judge is demanding some answers after confirming, on June 8, that he has read an unredacted version of the lengthy document.

U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton, according to Law & Crime's Matt Naham, has ordered the U.S. Department of Justice to answer questions "regarding certain redactions of the Mueller Report" at a hearing now set for July 20. In the past, Walton has been critical of Attorney General William Barr's response to the Mueller Report, asserting that Barr, in 2019, "distorted" the findings of former special counsel Robert Mueller. And now that Walton has read the Mueller Report in unredacted form, he is more concerned than ever about Barr's response to it.

The Mueller report hasn't been in the headlines much in 2020, a year that has found reporters heavily focused on the Ukraine scandal, President Donald Trump's acquittal on two articles of impeachment, the coronavirus pandemic, former Vice President Joe Biden's surge in the Democratic presidential primary and — most recently — the killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis on May 25. But the Mueller report is still a compelling read, and a federal judge is demanding some answers after confirming, on June 8, that he has read an unredacted version of the lengthy document.

U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton, according to Law & Crime's Matt Naham, has ordered the U.S. Department of Justice to answer questions "regarding certain redactions of the Mueller Report" at a hearing now set for July 20. In the past, Walton has been critical of Attorney General William Barr's response to the Mueller Report, asserting that Barr, in 2019, "distorted" the findings of former special counsel Robert Mueller. And now that Walton has read the Mueller Report in unredacted form, he is more concerned than ever about Barr's response to it.”

https://www.salon.com/2020/06/09/judge-who-accused-barr-of-distorting-mueller-report-demands-answers-after-reading-unredacted-copy_partner/

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/federal-judge-after-reading-the-unredacted-mueller-report-orders-doj-to-explain-itself-at-hearing/

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Judge Walton who accused Barr of "distorting" Mueller report demands answers..." (Original Post) Me. Jun 2020 OP
So, next Barr tells the judge to sit and spin Miguelito Loveless Jun 2020 #1
Not this Judge. Believe me. Solomon Jun 2020 #2
Totally Agree Me. Jun 2020 #4
Judge Sullivan as well. I know them both. Solomon Jun 2020 #20
Again, what will he do? Miguelito Loveless Jun 2020 #6
If There's Going To Be Any Sitting & Spinning It Will Be Barr Me. Jun 2020 #3
And he will do what? Miguelito Loveless Jun 2020 #5
So You Have Bought Into The Con Meme Me. Jun 2020 #7
No, nothing to"buy into" Miguelito Loveless Jun 2020 #8
They Have Me. Jun 2020 #9
And I apologize for my cynicism Miguelito Loveless Jun 2020 #10
Wine Would Be Preferred Me. Jun 2020 #12
If no reply from Barr justifying the redactions MoonlitKnight Jun 2020 #15
That I would like to see. Miguelito Loveless Jun 2020 #16
Who Knows Me. Jun 2020 #18
Ah, Mr. West was formidable, Miguelito Loveless Jun 2020 #19
The unredacted report will show two things ScratchCat Jun 2020 #11
You Are Correct Me. Jun 2020 #13
K&R for visibility. crickets Jun 2020 #14
... Me. Jun 2020 #17

Miguelito Loveless

(4,454 posts)
10. And I apologize for my cynicism
Wed Jun 10, 2020, 11:06 AM
Jun 2020

at this point. I REALLY would love you to be right, and Walton to come out whipping them six ways to Sunday. In fact, I will buy you pizza and beer if that happens.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
12. Wine Would Be Preferred
Wed Jun 10, 2020, 11:28 AM
Jun 2020

The way I view it is this...Walton is as mad as hell and will do all he can to hold them to account just as Judge Sullivan is doing in the Flynn case. Also, there always comes a time when the wind changes and I believe we are at that point. Bully Barr and the WH Menace have been getting away with dirty deeds all their lives and a reckoning is due. Just as it's coming to Lindsay Graham

MoonlitKnight

(1,584 posts)
15. If no reply from Barr justifying the redactions
Wed Jun 10, 2020, 12:46 PM
Jun 2020

Then the judge is free to decide for himself what should be redacted and release the rest.

Miguelito Loveless

(4,454 posts)
16. That I would like to see.
Wed Jun 10, 2020, 12:56 PM
Jun 2020

The question is whether the judge wishes to become "an enemy of the people" and subject toTrump's minions in and out of government.

Miguelito Loveless

(4,454 posts)
19. Ah, Mr. West was formidable,
Wed Jun 10, 2020, 01:16 PM
Jun 2020

but my preference for a dinner companion would have been Mr. Gordon. I prefer brain, to brawn.

ScratchCat

(1,977 posts)
11. The unredacted report will show two things
Wed Jun 10, 2020, 11:16 AM
Jun 2020

First, Trump was well aware of what his kid, Stone, Kushner and aides were up to regarding Russia.

Second, it will show that Mueller was considering asking for a perjury charge because two of Trumps written answers were contradicted by at least three other witnesses.

The first is obvious and was assumed by all; the second would have likely lead more Republicans to convict.

Me.

(35,454 posts)
13. You Are Correct
Wed Jun 10, 2020, 11:30 AM
Jun 2020

but I think there will be more than 2 things. Also, I'm surely looking for it to be an indictment of Flynn.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Judge Walton who accused...