Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo after Today's SC rulings what do we think the Trump Explosion Defcon level is at the WH
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
16 replies, 1162 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
16 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So after Today's SC rulings what do we think the Trump Explosion Defcon level is at the WH (Original Post)
sunonmars
Jun 2020
OP
And sometimes they decide not to decide questions that are mostly political,
The Velveteen Ocelot
Jun 2020
#14
Peacetrain
(22,872 posts)1. Through the roof.. and he will try and order the military in to cities..
anything to try and get control... just a guess, and I hope I am so far off the wall on that.. I would be thankful to be wrong
NRaleighLiberal
(60,006 posts)2. 10 one handed glasses of water. 5 steep ramps.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)3. ROFL
malaise
(268,693 posts)5. You win the thread
Hugin
(33,047 posts)6. ... and an umbrella.
Don't forget the umbrella!
RKP5637
(67,086 posts)4. ...
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,586 posts)7. He's gonna hate the sanctuary cities decision -
technically not a decision, just a decision not to decide - and HIS very own hand-picked justices didn't do his bidding! Will he try to fire them (which of course he can't do)? Will he rage-tweet about them and call them Democrat losers? Stay tuned!
lastlib
(23,152 posts)8. He's about to go Texas City on us........
Johnny2X2X
(18,969 posts)9. They'll use this
They'll say they need more Con SCOTUS justices.
sunonmars
(8,656 posts)10. and the FDA just stuck a knife in him too.......
spanone
(135,791 posts)11. let's hope they decide he must release his taxes.....
KaBoom!!!!
Squinch
(50,911 posts)12. I am happy, but often the SC does something like this so they
don't look politically motivated when they throw down another obviously politically motivated conservative decision 5 to 4.
What could it be?
Ohiogal
(31,909 posts)13. Isn't there another challenge to the ACA
on their agenda?
Squinch
(50,911 posts)15. I know there's a union decision up that could effectively end unions.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,586 posts)14. And sometimes they decide not to decide questions that are mostly political,
which is the right thing to do.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)16. Right now he's asking his advisors...
...if he can fire The Supreme Court.