Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn landmark case, Supreme Court rules LGBTQ workers are protected from job discrimination
In landmark case, Supreme Court rules LGBTQ workers are protected from job discrimination
The decision said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status.
Supreme Court rules existing federal law forbids discrimination based on sexual orientation
June 15, 2020, 10:05 AM EDT / Updated June 15, 2020, 11:15 AM EDT
By Pete Williams
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that existing federal law forbids job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or transgender status, a major victory for advocates of gay rights and for the nascent transgender rights movement and a surprising one from an increasingly conservative court.
By a vote of 6-3, the court said Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which makes it illegal for employers to discriminate because of a person's sex, among other factors, also covers sexual orientation and transgender status. It upheld rulings from lower courts that said sexual orientation discrimination was a form of sex discrimination.
Equally surprising was that the decision was written by President Donald Trump's first Supreme Court appointee, Neil Gorsuch, who was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the court's four more liberal members to form a majority.
"An employer who fired an individual for being homosexual or transgender fires that person for traits or actions it would not have questioned in members of a different sex," Gorsuch wrote for the court. "Sex plays a necessary and undisguisable role in the decision, exactly what Title VII forbids."
"Those who adopted the Civil Rights Act might not have anticipated their work would lead to this particular result," he wrote, adding, "But the limits of the drafters' imagination supply no reason to ignore the law's demands."
"Only the written word is the law, and all persons are entitled to its benefit," he wrote.
"Those who adopted the Civil Rights Act might not have anticipated their work would lead to this particular result," he wrote, adding, "But the limits of the drafters' imagination supply no reason to ignore the law's demands."
"Only the written word is the law, and all persons are entitled to its benefit," he wrote.
more...
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-rules-existing-civil-rights-law-protects-gay-lesbian-n1231018
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 615 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In landmark case, Supreme Court rules LGBTQ workers are protected from job discrimination (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2020
OP
unblock
(52,118 posts)1. !!!
i did not expect this!!!
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)2. I am gobsmacked over this.
I can't believe it!
50 Shades Of Blue
(9,922 posts)3. Thrilled!
greatauntoftriplets
(175,729 posts)4. Spanky's not going to like this.
But I'm very happy and relieved.
Budi
(15,325 posts)5. "Only the written word is the law, and all persons are entitled to its benefit," he wrote.
Wow!
This is rather shocking, but we'll take it!
Ms. Toad
(33,997 posts)6. Absolutely stunned.
I've predicted pretty much every other landmark LGBT case correctly. I was predicting we'd lose these 5-4. Very happy to be wrong.