Supreme Court won't hear challenge to California sanctuary law

[RandySF]

Washington (CNN)The Supreme Court on Monday left in place a lower court opinion upholding one of California's so-called sanctuary laws that limits cooperation between law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, a measure that the Trump administration says is meant to "undermine" federal immigration enforcement.

The Trump administration had asked the court to step in and review the law and the court declined to do so.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, two of the Court's conservative members, supported taking up the case.

The law -- and others like it -- have ignited a firestorm between the federal government, which has made immigration enforcement a top priority, and some states that say they are within their rights to determine how best to use their own resources.


https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/15/politics/sanctuary-cities-california-supreme-court/index.html

[UTUSN]

1. K&R

[alwaysinasnit]

2. k&r for visibility

[customerserviceguy]

3. I think there's a strategy here

Some of the conservative members of the Court don't want to have hot-button issues percolating while they're trying to re-elect Trump. There's plenty of opportunities to revisit issues in future years.

The SCOTUS was more than happy to jump in when Arizona was accused of making its own immigration laws that were in conflict with the Federal government under President Obama.