Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,860 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2020, 06:50 PM Jun 2020

Supplier delivered bad steel to Navy for subs, say court documents

The Navy's top supplier of steel to build submarines gave the service inferior metal for years, prompting a nearly $10.9 million settlement, the Justice Department said in court filings released on Monday.

Bradken Inc., based in Kansas City, Mo., paid the settlement to resolve allegations that the company "produced and sold substandard steel components for installation on U.S. Navy vessels" after a Bradken employee "knowingly falsified test results to conceal the fact that the components did not meet the Navy's specifications," according to a department statement.

"When government contractors supply our armed forces with equipment that fails to meet performance standards, they not only cheat taxpayers, they also potentially put our service members at risk," Jody Hunt, the assistant attorney general for the department's civil division branch, said in the statement. "Today's settlement demonstrates our commitment to ensuring the military receives products that enable it to perform its critical mission."

Bradken provides steel castings to Navy contractors Electric Boat and Newport News Shipbuilding, which uses the high yield steel to make submarine hulls. In 2017, the company discovered that the director of metallurgy at its foundry in Tacoma, Wash., had been falsifying metal strength tests results, claiming that nearly half of the steel Bradken produced for Navy submarines met the service's requirements when it didn't.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supplier-delivered-bad-steel-to-navy-for-subs-say-court-documents/ar-BB15zJ88?li=BBnbcA1

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supplier delivered bad steel to Navy for subs, say court documents (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 OP
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Jun 2020 #1
Rebublican values at work nt List left Jun 2020 #2
So, who's going to jail? gratuitous Jun 2020 #3
$11 Million is just a fraction of the cost of just one sub. lpbk2713 Jun 2020 #4
A Columbia class sub is $6.2 Billion, plus ... marble falls Jun 2020 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author NutmegYankee Jun 2020 #7
Are we still winning? fleur-de-lisa Jun 2020 #6
Looks like this problem runs across administrations. nt Blue_true Jun 2020 #8

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. So, who's going to jail?
Tue Jun 16, 2020, 07:00 PM
Jun 2020

Oh, a $10.9 million settlement? Well, that'll show 'em! Meanwhile, for ordinary citizens, summary execution is just a 9-1-1 call away.

lpbk2713

(42,751 posts)
4. $11 Million is just a fraction of the cost of just one sub.
Tue Jun 16, 2020, 07:05 PM
Jun 2020


These good ole boys got off with a wink and a nod.

marble falls

(57,063 posts)
5. A Columbia class sub is $6.2 Billion, plus ...
Tue Jun 16, 2020, 07:30 PM
Jun 2020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia-class_submarine

The cost to build Columbia, the lead boat of the class, will be an estimated $6.2 billion (fiscal 2010 dollars).

Response to marble falls (Reply #5)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supplier delivered bad st...