Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shockey80

(4,379 posts)
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 09:06 AM Jun 2020

Who could have guessed; The information age would lead to mass ignorance.

We have the information from all the books, in all the worlds library's at our fingertips. Instead of searching for facts and the truth, millions of people go in search of propaganda that makes them feel good. This is the story of the Trump voter.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who could have guessed; The information age would lead to mass ignorance. (Original Post) shockey80 Jun 2020 OP
' . . . makes them feel' . . . strong! empedocles Jun 2020 #1
Aldus Huxley guessed this htuttle Jun 2020 #2
OMG htuttle, we think alike, scary. gab13by13 Jun 2020 #4
I know that comparisons have been made gab13by13 Jun 2020 #3
Agree Johnny2X2X Jun 2020 #6
Social media allows ignorance to be supported and propagate. honest.abe Jun 2020 #5
Yes, and it is not just limited to one side..... Chainfire Jun 2020 #8
trump supporters need not work too hard at being ignorant beachbumbob Jun 2020 #7
I guess we now have to call it The Disinformation Age. ananda Jun 2020 #9
bring to mind the saying treestar Jun 2020 #10
I beg to differ. The ignorance was always there. The information age has only exposed & amplified it onetexan Jun 2020 #11

htuttle

(23,738 posts)
2. Aldus Huxley guessed this
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 09:13 AM
Jun 2020

From the introduction to Neil Postman's "Amusing Ourselves to Death" comparing 1984 to Brave New World:

What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egotism.

Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy.

As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions." In 1984, Orwell added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Brave New World, they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that our fear will ruin us. Huxley feared that our desire will ruin us.

gab13by13

(21,283 posts)
3. I know that comparisons have been made
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 09:13 AM
Jun 2020

of Trump and 1984 and Farenheit 451 but I am reading Huxley's Brave New World for the third time and dammit I believe that the oligarchs who own our politicians would lead us down the path of Brave New World. Working class people are created in the embryo to be stupid, we have the MSM basically doing the same thing.

Every time I read Brave New World I get something new out of it. My Ford I need my soma after that.

Johnny2X2X

(19,005 posts)
6. Agree
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 09:50 AM
Jun 2020

I might have to re-read Brave New World. I was thinking about it the other day when remarking how 119,000 Americans are dead and no one seems to care one bit anymore, it's just something that happens. People are numb to the death already, it's just numbers.

honest.abe

(8,649 posts)
5. Social media allows ignorance to be supported and propagate.
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 09:22 AM
Jun 2020

Its a troubling and dangerous side effect of online technology.

Chainfire

(17,519 posts)
8. Yes, and it is not just limited to one side.....
Wed Jun 17, 2020, 10:03 AM
Jun 2020

I find myself falling into the same situation. I take my daily news from BBC, Reuters, NPR and CBS. When I hear the term "Fox News" I turn my head and spit. Although I used to be one of the few liberal voices who participated on a conservative forum, I got to the point, after a few years, that I could no longer stand all of the darkness, lies and hate. So the bottom line is I only give credence to sources that I agree with too.

Intellectually, I know that there has to be some positive aspects to Donald Trump, and his administration, but I will not accept any of it; I have too much invested in hating the man and his party to give them the benefit of any doubt. So, in fact, emotionally, I am no different than the Trump 40%, just a mirror image; and I am unapologetic about it......

I suspect that, truth be known, a lot of frequent flyers here, feel the same way, whether they want to admit it or not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who could have guessed; T...