Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoesn't the Tulsa Department of Health have an obligation...
...to close any facility open to the public if it deems it to be a major health risk?
Also, what do BOKs insurers have to say about this? Ive heard that lawyers are saying that the waivers being signed by the attendees of Brother Dons Travelin Con-tagion Show arent worth spit.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Doesn't the Tulsa Department of Health have an obligation... (Original Post)
Girard442
Jun 2020
OP
Trump, his campaign and the venue are covering themselves by handing out masks
StarfishSaver
Jun 2020
#1
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)1. Trump, his campaign and the venue are covering themselves by handing out masks
I think that provides them the legal cover they need. If people refuse to take the masks or to put them on and later get sick, that's on them because they themselves were negligent.
MontanaMama
(24,644 posts)2. It seems that the leadership in Tulsa
could just say NO. What a concept.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)3. True. Liability is different than responsibility