Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here's a supposed head count for the rally.... (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Jun 2020 OP
Bodycount is an unfortunate choice of words. mahina Jun 2020 #1
How would it rebound? Nevilledog Jun 2020 #3
They could easily do the same to us. mahina Jun 2020 #6
Difference is our people would show up. Nevilledog Jun 2020 #7
Clearly. Mercy. Just saying, jus in bello and ad bellum. mahina Jun 2020 #8
I didn't mean to sound bitchy, just laying out the other side. Nevilledog Jun 2020 #9
Raja. mahina Jun 2020 #11
I'm so happy you posted this! dixiegrrrrl Jun 2020 #13
Nor mine though the nuns had me for a good long while mahina Jun 2020 #16
I appreciate your links dixiegrrrrl Jun 2020 #18
It's super nice to connect w you again. Thank you for mahina Jun 2020 #20
Joe wouldn't prance around bragging about the estimated number of people attending. tavernier Jun 2020 #15
Very true. He wouldn't brag or lie or put us at risk for his vanity. mahina Jun 2020 #17
"An unprecedented 6,611 suckers."! TY, dixiegrrrrl! Cha Jun 2020 #2
Who said 10,000? dixiegrrrrl Jun 2020 #14
I wonder how many of them were scared off by the reality of the virus Renew Deal Jun 2020 #4
Apparently, 6,600 of the attendees were paid via Craiglist ads, but credit to Trump. Doodley Jun 2020 #5
*snicker* Nevilledog Jun 2020 #10
it only takes one to spread the virus yuiyoshida Jun 2020 #12
To be kind it was a malaise Jun 2020 #19
Did you see the news clip of him arriving back from tulsa? dixiegrrrrl Jun 2020 #22
Gutted is the word malaise Jun 2020 #23
In aviation terminology, it's referred to as Souls On Board (SOBs). MAGAts don't have souls. TheBlackAdder Jun 2020 #21

mahina

(17,646 posts)
1. Bodycount is an unfortunate choice of words.
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 02:19 AM
Jun 2020

Good info though.

I worry that the ticket action will rebound on us, but it was effective.

It's so upside down that the opposite outcome than the President wants is going to save lives in that area.

Thanks to the young people who got tickets. They may not have done it to save lives but that's the result.

That and a piqued giant reptile.

Nevilledog

(51,080 posts)
3. How would it rebound?
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 02:26 AM
Jun 2020

No matter how many fake ticket requests...... He couldn't get 19k to show up! That has nothing to do with how many requests were made.

mahina

(17,646 posts)
6. They could easily do the same to us.
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 03:43 AM
Jun 2020

That it wasn’t Joe’s idea won’t matter.

Of course with the virus Joe won’t be holding rallies like this anyway because he cares if we live or not.

Nevilledog

(51,080 posts)
7. Difference is our people would show up.
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 03:46 AM
Jun 2020

And never in a million years would you see Biden's campaign staff spouting the bullshit the trump campaign did.

And it wouldn't be during a pandemic.

mahina

(17,646 posts)
8. Clearly. Mercy. Just saying, jus in bello and ad bellum.
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 03:49 AM
Jun 2020

It must be a just war in cause and in execution.

I guess you disagree with me and my buddy St Augustine.

Cheers.

mahina

(17,646 posts)
11. Raja.
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 04:09 AM
Jun 2020
https://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl201/modules/Philosophers/Augustine/augustine_justwar.html



Augustine: Just War

Augustine is noted in history as the founder of Just War Theory in the Western tradition (The Islamic world has it's own tradition of Just War Theory based on the Koran). This is a body of thought that seeks to provide guidelines for when it is justified for one nation to wage war on another. These guidelines also seek to clarify what sorts of conduct are morally acceptable within war.

One popular theory of justice in war is simply Might is Right. Whosoever has the greater power is able to dominate others, and so is in the position to determine what is just and unjust. An early philosophical statement of this position is given by Thrasymachus in Plato's Republic. He says that "justice is the interest of the stronger." Numerous nations have followed this policy, even though few admit it. Imagine a nation that was so powerful that no other nation could stand as a credible threat. Perhaps this nation had great weapons of total destruction as well as powerful military forces to enforce policies. Such a nation would seek to protect its status as the primary might by attacking any other nation that came close to its military power. Of course, such a nation would issue proclamations of it's virtue and benevolence and inherent peacefulness. Yet, let another power emerge that posed even a remote threat to its hegemony, and that other power would be attacked and dismantled. Such a nation would operate on the Might is Right principle.

Augustine lived in the era when Rome had lost its control of the world and was quickly falling to other powers. The question of moral values in war were immanent for him. Augustine identified two aspects of war that required moral justification and guidelines:
-The right to go to war (Jus Ad Bellum)
-The right sorts of conduct in war (Jus In Bello)

The right to go to war concerns the justification that a nation must give in order for it to have a moral right to wage war on another. Augustine laid the basis for four main criteria:
1. Just Authority - is the decision to go to war based on a legitimate political and legal process?
2. Just Cause - has a wrong been committed to which war is the appropriate response?
3. Right Intention - is the response proportional to the cause? i.e. is the war action limited to righting the wrong, and no further. When people speak of "mission creep," this condition is the relevant concern.
4. Last Resort - has every other means of righting the wrong been attempted sincerely so that no other option but war remains?

The conduct of war is clearly a matter of moral concern. Even when a nation is justified in waging war on another, there are moral limits on what it may do in prosecuting the war. Defining and enforcing such limits has been a long a concern for international agreement and law.
1. Proportionality - The proportionality of the use of force in a war. The degree of allowable force used in the war must be measured against the force required to correct the Just cause and limited by Just Intention (see Jus Ad Bellum).
2. Discrimination -The combatants discriminate between combatants and noncombatants. Innocent, nonmilitary people should never be made the target of attacks.
3. Responsibility - A country is not responsible for unexpected side effects of its military activity as long as the following three conditions are met:
(a) The action must carry the intention to produce good consequences.
(b) The bad effects were not intended.
(c) The good of the war must outweigh the damage done by it.
More resources on the criteria and case studies of just war theory are available at the Just War Theory website (see Resources at the left).
These criteria have been revised and expanded, notably by Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century. Since war is a constant human condition, the concerns for it's moral constraint are ever important. Consider how the criteria of Just War may be applied to the present. Clearly an insightful philosopher writing almost 1,600 years ago speaks to matters that are relevant to us now and will be relevant to us for some time. Philosophy is a living and present concern, even when it speaks to us from the distant past.

End of this Philosopher's Portrait of Augustine.


dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
13. I'm so happy you posted this!
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 12:31 PM
Jun 2020

I always wondered, off and on. It was not something they taught in my school years.

mahina

(17,646 posts)
16. Nor mine though the nuns had me for a good long while
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 04:35 PM
Jun 2020

I didn’t learn about the just war theory until I started studying peace. I gleaned a few key points that is like to share here if you don’t mind.

One was from a prof of organizing. He used this book, Organizing for Social Change, and it’s a great resource. http://www.midwestacademy.com/manual/

Here’s another nugget. Remember Margaret Meade, the anthropologist? She thrashed the trope that we are wired for war, that it’s just part of our biology and so, unavoidable. Not at all.

She said all we must do to disprove that idea is find one human society without war. She did.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/margaret-meads-war-theory-kicks-butt-of-neo-darwinian-and-malthusian-models/

She said we should be noted as a species for our bent toward cooperation and helping each other.

How about that?

Please also check the work of Hawaii’s son Gene Sharp. I recommend all but From Dictatorship to Democracy and the 198 Methods of Nonviolent Resistance are quick and useful. https://www.aeinstein.org/

If you can get your hands on the video documentary A Force More Powerful - Nonviolent Resistance
It’s on YouTube often but briefly so instead of adding a link that will change later I’ll ask you to find it. Part II is my favorite but the first is foundational.

Rosa Parks didn’t just happen to decide to remain seated that day on a whim. She had nonviolent resistance training. This was a result of community organizing.

“When people decide they want to be free there is nothing that can stop them”
Desmond Tutu

Glad to strengthen our connection. Aloha.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
18. I appreciate your links
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 07:29 PM
Jun 2020

I'm an old community organizer from way back in the day.

I have been feeling very pessimistic about it all of late, esp. the here we go again cycle of increasing right wing Gov. across the globe.
Your outlook is helpful....thank you.

mahina

(17,646 posts)
20. It's super nice to connect w you again. Thank you for
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 10:20 PM
Jun 2020

Forgiving the pedantic streak.

I’ve spent a chunk of my day trying to talk down a friend who is intelligent, whom I respect and really like so much, and now also find her to be gullible.

Long story short is she’s very sure that the primary was stolen from Bernie Sanders and that the United Nations monitored the primary and found a huge swing from exit polls to voting data of 15% in California.

Wild assertions without evidence swallowed whole are amazingly durable.

It’s got me pretty down. It’s a freaking tough haul this go round. I think you have every reason to feel that way.

Cheers Dixiegrrl.

/Disclosure I supported Bernie last time but when Hillary won I was really happy to volunteer for her and I can say I did everything I could for her candidacy.

mahina

(17,646 posts)
17. Very true. He wouldn't brag or lie or put us at risk for his vanity.
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 04:51 PM
Jun 2020

He wouldn’t stoop to dividing us by race. There’s almost nothing the two have in common. One is a good man and a leader and the other is a plague on two feet.

It’s still true that we don’t have to make stuff up to defeat their ideas, and that it would be foolish to do so.

When you have a thousand strong arguments why would anyone reach for a weak and disprovable one?

Renew Deal

(81,856 posts)
4. I wonder how many of them were scared off by the reality of the virus
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 02:27 AM
Jun 2020

And how many wives objected to bring back the virus to the family.

Doodley

(9,088 posts)
5. Apparently, 6,600 of the attendees were paid via Craiglist ads, but credit to Trump.
Sun Jun 21, 2020, 03:06 AM
Jun 2020

He did get 11 people to turn up.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
22. Did you see the news clip of him arriving back from tulsa?
Mon Jun 22, 2020, 11:24 AM
Jun 2020


His tie was undone, his shirt collar open, and he looked gutted.
It was lovely.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's a supposed head co...