Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,757 posts)
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 01:59 PM Jun 2020

'Alarming number': Boomers struggle to save enough for retirement, survey finds

Many baby boomers don’t have nearly enough money to retire.

The median amount they have saved for retirement is $144,000, according to a recent survey from Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, a figure that should be a “call to action” for boomers, said one financial expert.

“When we think about it, $144,000 to last in retirement that could be 20 or 30 years just isn’t going to go very far,” said Catherine Collinson, CEO and president of the Transamerica Center, in a conversation with Yahoo Finance. “It’s a very alarming number.”

Financial firms, such as Fidelity Investments, recommend those nearing 67 to have saved 10 times their salary. But Collinson said the shortfall for baby boomers is largely because of the late emergence of 401(k) pre-tax retirement plans.

https://money.yahoo.com/boomers-struggle-to-save-enough-for-retirement-survey-finds-205447433.html

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Alarming number': Boomers struggle to save enough for retirement, survey finds (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 OP
Doesn't this story get released every year? brooklynite Jun 2020 #1
We retired at 64 and 61 last year phylny Jun 2020 #25
The first generation without private pensions DBoon Jun 2020 #2
Agree Johnny2X2X Jun 2020 #3
We have a posh care home near me. It's about $500 a day. leftyladyfrommo Jun 2020 #8
Have a chef friend Johnny2X2X Jun 2020 #9
Traditional pensions were great if you worked your whole career for one company MichMan Jun 2020 #14
My husband stayed with the same company phylny Jun 2020 #26
Given what birth years you attribute to the Boom generation, PoindexterOglethorpe Jun 2020 #4
I should have more money saved than I do, I'll admit. Dyedinthewoolliberal Jun 2020 #5
Really good points. Mike 03 Jun 2020 #6
Pensions zipplewrath Jun 2020 #11
My parents are getting around $5300 a month in Social Security madville Jun 2020 #7
What about their social security? nt Quixote1818 Jun 2020 #10
My parents are 70 madville Jun 2020 #17
3 Straight Republican Recessions and/or Depressions Have Made it Pretty Damn Difficult Stallion Jun 2020 #12
Flat or declining wages for employees since the mid 1980's. haele Jun 2020 #13
This was my game. gibraltar72 Jun 2020 #15
Dh is a boomer MissB Jun 2020 #16
Sky high Healthcare & medication costs are no joke for the elderly. onetexan Jun 2020 #18
What about Medicare? MichMan Jun 2020 #24
I'm used to living on SSDI alone along with a $140 a month VA pension Kaleva Jun 2020 #19
They Wrecked as much as they have benefitted RANDYWILDMAN Jun 2020 #20
You might want to make an exception for the latter part of the Clinton administration Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 #21
I would except his damage was done by adding RANDYWILDMAN Jun 2020 #23
Imagine how much profit those who bought in the 60s made! That would be the silent gen and they seaglass Jun 2020 #27
The saddest part of this is that we just finished up a historic stock market run Bucky Jun 2020 #22

brooklynite

(94,363 posts)
1. Doesn't this story get released every year?
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 02:01 PM
Jun 2020

FWIW, my wife and I are boomers about 2-3 years out from retirement, and have plugged as much money as possible into whichever options were available to us (401k, 457, IRA, taxable investments, etc.).

phylny

(8,368 posts)
25. We retired at 64 and 61 last year
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 06:26 PM
Jun 2020

and were fortunate that my husband has a pension. We have his 401K and pension, and Social Security for both of us. We lived carefully, if not frugally. We never went to Disney, took expensive trips, or lived on credit card debt. We drove our cars until the cars weren’t worth repairing. We did as much home repair, projects, and car maintenance as we possibly could by ourselves.

We did go to Italy last year, a once-in-a-lifetime trip. We know we are much more fortunate than most.

DBoon

(22,340 posts)
2. The first generation without private pensions
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 02:03 PM
Jun 2020

Individual retirement savings shifts the risk of investment to the individual. Doesn't work out so well for many.

Johnny2X2X

(18,973 posts)
3. Agree
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 02:05 PM
Jun 2020

And in the end most of us end up in the same exact spot to die. A state run nursing home sharing a room.

I don't care how much money you've saved, a nice country club like nursing home is too expensive to spend many years there for all but the very very rich. You're talking a couple hundred grand a year for the nice places. So they take it all and then ship you off to a state run nursing home.

So I say, make the state run homes a lot nicer.

leftyladyfrommo

(18,866 posts)
8. We have a posh care home near me. It's about $500 a day.
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 03:08 PM
Jun 2020

Last edited Tue Jun 23, 2020, 04:21 PM - Edit history (1)

A fruend is in a regular care home and it's about $4,000 + a month. She pays $400 extra for a private room.

Johnny2X2X

(18,973 posts)
9. Have a chef friend
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 03:10 PM
Jun 2020

He worked at the fancy one in town for several years, $25,000 a month, and even that wasn't as nice as you'd think. Obviously he was a chef so he was involved in the food and he said they get the same ingredients that a buffet place would get, nothing fancy at all.

MichMan

(11,869 posts)
14. Traditional pensions were great if you worked your whole career for one company
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 03:51 PM
Jun 2020

Very few people do that anymore, with many changing jobs every few years for better opportunities. Can't imagine how much it must have sucked to keep plugging along in a job you hated merely because you had to keep the pension going.

401k may have drawbacks, but at least they are portable and not tied to any one employer. It has worked out well for me. Hoping to retire in another year or so.

phylny

(8,368 posts)
26. My husband stayed with the same company
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 06:29 PM
Jun 2020

for 38 years, although his jobs changed. It was really hard at times, but the pension, payable until the last of us dies, made it a good decision for us.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,816 posts)
4. Given what birth years you attribute to the Boom generation,
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 02:26 PM
Jun 2020

at least half of them are 62 or older. And given that an astonishing (to me at least) percentage who collect SS at the earliest possible age, this is quite sad.

Dyedinthewoolliberal

(15,546 posts)
5. I should have more money saved than I do, I'll admit.
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 02:27 PM
Jun 2020

Having said that, I also know that for the average American, wages don't allow for that kind of savings plan. By the time you get done with obligations, there simply isn't enough to match what they say you should do. I am not even gonna talk about the impact of either kids or elderly parents on the budget...………….

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
6. Really good points.
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 02:45 PM
Jun 2020

There are unforeseeable contingencies that are hard to plan for while simultaneously saving ten times your annual salary. I know friends of my parents who due to circumstances beyond their control have had to raise their grandchildren (sometimes going to court over various legal issues) or still have aging parents who ran into economic difficulty. And I don't say these contingencies are "uncommon"; difficulties are commonplace.



zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
11. Pensions
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 03:14 PM
Jun 2020

Pensions are the way that people can come together and share in the risks and rewards. It makes it possible to "save" enough for retirement, even with the unforeseen circumstances that come in life. We all "pay in" during our lives not knowing how much we'll "take out". That drives the conservatives nuts because they go apoplectic when someone gets more than they give, or worse one gives more than they get.

Republicans wake up every morning worrying that someone, somewhere is getting something they don't deserve.

Democrats wake up every morning worrying that someone, somewhere isn't getting something they need.

madville

(7,404 posts)
7. My parents are getting around $5300 a month in Social Security
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 02:57 PM
Jun 2020

They waited until hitting age 70 last year to start drawing though so they were maxing it out. That’s not a bad strategy if you want to and are able to keep working well into your 60s.

madville

(7,404 posts)
17. My parents are 70
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 04:26 PM
Jun 2020

They are getting about $5300 a month in social security but they delayed drawing it until recently to maximize the amount and they actually still enjoyed working.

haele

(12,640 posts)
13. Flat or declining wages for employees since the mid 1980's.
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 03:36 PM
Jun 2020

Boomers in their 70's and 80's benefitted from the Unions and the New Deal, but most workers in their 60's were sold the "401k" myth, lost wages through Union Busting concessions and increasing turn to contract and service employment, skyrocketing secondary education costs, MBAs and venture capitalism on steroids, consumer regulatory practices unraveling, and the rise of the use of a "credit check" as a tool just to get a job, rent or buy a home, or just to make a major purchase, even if you were going to pay cash. Boomers (and Gen-Xers) now in their fifties to seventies saw the change from being called personnel to being called "human resources" - a serious change that exemplifies the monitization of human value to a corporate culture.
I have actually seen wages go down without a corresponding rise in benefits (including retirement) for jobs that require certification or training as soon as the novelty of new technology wears off. This is not just an adjust for standard of living calculation, I saw jobs - shipyard welding - that would start at $12 an hour for a trained apprentice with paid benefits and a pension program in 1991 drop to $9 an hour in 2001 with a benefits option they had to pay into and an equally optional 401k with "up to 5% matching after 5 years". Same in retail and service jobs where previously full time employees found their jobs recategorize to part time or temp/at will or contract work, losing hours and benefits their employer no longer had to worry about paying.

Unless they were in Tech or Finance, the later Boomers are in no better shape than the average wage employee of the 1920's. No retirement, cost of living constantly going up, and technology reducing the jobs available to those who can't afford to take the time to start up their own business, get an advanced education or network themselves into a management track.

Haele

gibraltar72

(7,499 posts)
15. This was my game.
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 03:52 PM
Jun 2020

Early on in my career I went to a seminar. The speaker said this generation will be retired more years than they worked for the company they retire from. He was referring to the current mostly union jobs that had early outs and also the fact that people weren't going to work for just one company. This made it clear to me that it was my job to explain that to my clients. Coincidentally I started in the field just as IRAs became law. I have had many thank me for helping them save money by putting away pretty modest sums consistently. It was hard to get people to pay themselves first.

MissB

(15,804 posts)
16. Dh is a boomer
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 04:06 PM
Jun 2020

Just barely.

The only reason he (we) have a good amount in his 401k is that he’s been lucky. Well, we’ve been lucky.

Lucky to remain in the same job for over 30 years. Lucky to have a reasonable house payment. Lucky to have a good wage that allowed him to contribute the maximum amount each year. Lucky to have no health issues.

Damn luck.

Kaleva

(36,259 posts)
19. I'm used to living on SSDI alone along with a $140 a month VA pension
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 04:34 PM
Jun 2020

I supplement my income by babysitting for $4 an hour which nets me about $98 a week.

Add the benefits I get for being low income, I'll do fine on SS.

RANDYWILDMAN

(2,664 posts)
20. They Wrecked as much as they have benefitted
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 04:51 PM
Jun 2020

They have made more or the housing market they any other in the history of the world. My house in Oregon sold in 1980 for 87,000 sold last year for 587,000 same exact house. They were the group that could buy houses from 1980-2000 and the market has exploded from 2000-2020 and they as a group were the owners who have made the most of this.

The story is only focusing on one aspect of retirement.


Markets
1987 crash
2008 crash

Politics
1980 elected an idiot who borrowed and gutted S.S, that guy also gutted Unions and defined benefit pensions by drastically changing bankruptcy laws!
1980-2008 Elected leaders and government who borrowed and ran up huge Debt, through WAR(s) on Credit and a useless battle on Terror at the Expense of social safety nets.

The next generations will not be able to make nearly as much money off of their house, so they will need to save more for sure. Will my kids ever be able to buy a house ??????



Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,757 posts)
21. You might want to make an exception for the latter part of the Clinton administration
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 05:05 PM
Jun 2020

Bush II inherited a surplus which he turned into a trillion dollar deficit.

RANDYWILDMAN

(2,664 posts)
23. I would except his damage was done by adding
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 06:17 PM
Jun 2020

all the police and creating Prisons Inc, also Welfare reform did not help the social safety net. He did social damage not really financial.


For the black lives matter supports, Did you love how Clinton added all the police??????

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
27. Imagine how much profit those who bought in the 60s made! That would be the silent gen and they
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 07:41 PM
Jun 2020

quadrupled their initial investment rather than doubled.

Don't know how old you/your kids are, my kids are millenials - my daughter and her soon to be husband bought a house 2 years ago, my son and his gf are in the market right now. So there is hope.

I agree that housing prices are crazy, we have a lot of new condos going up in our town for 450k-500k and my husband and I are always wondering who the heck can/or would want to buy them.

Bucky

(53,947 posts)
22. The saddest part of this is that we just finished up a historic stock market run
Tue Jun 23, 2020, 05:21 PM
Jun 2020

If schools just better educated students in high school how to save for retirement, emergencies, children's college expenses, etc. all these boomers & early GenXers would've spent the 90s and the 10s piling up cash instead of debt.

I came in late to the stock market in '98, investing small & regular, almost all in low risk mutual and index funds, and it's yielded 15% per year. The whole market alone is 11% annually over that time. I teach my student to never check daily numbers and buy big when the market dips.

If you're in your forties and not doing this yet, start now. The next 20 years won't be like the last 22, but the market always climbs faster than inflation. If you're in your 30s, also do this and you'll retire without any money worries.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Alarming number': Boomer...