General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsa kennedy
(36,341 posts)PRETZEL
(3,245 posts)Without seeing anything more, this apparently was the 3 judge panel's opinion. There was always speculation that the ruling would hinge on 1 judge (and I apologize her name isn't popping into my mind) but you can be assured that this will be elevated to the full panel now.
Judge Sullivan will not take this ruling sitting down,
still_one
(98,883 posts)PRETZEL
(3,245 posts)but can't he appeal to the full court?
still_one
(98,883 posts)PRETZEL
(3,245 posts)but at least this decision needs to be affirmed by the full Court of Appeals, at a minimum.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)Nevilledog
(55,134 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(20,026 posts)It's just who knows who.
Beaverhausen
(24,706 posts)I dont understand. This is fucked up.
Tom Rinaldo
(23,193 posts)We are deeply indebted to him for that. The report that he requested that retired Judge to enter into the record is now public information. The fraud has at least been well documented. He did what he could and what he could do still matters.
ck4829
(38,093 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.