Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How can this be how the system works? (Original Post) Takket Jun 2020 OP
*A third judge on the panel, elleng Jun 2020 #1
Thank you for posting this. nt Mike 03 Jun 2020 #3
Nothing mysterious: Neomi Rao, Trump's replacement for Brett Kavanaugh DonaldsRump Jun 2020 #2
Right, rao's paying her masters. elleng Jun 2020 #5
Some systems are functonal but the tRUMP/reTHUG system was developed and is administered in abqtommy Jun 2020 #4
K&R for the post and the discussion. crickets Jun 2020 #6

elleng

(131,370 posts)
1. *A third judge on the panel,
Wed Jun 24, 2020, 11:59 AM
Jun 2020

Judge Robert L. Wilkins, a 2014 appointee of President Barack Obama, dissented. He said Judge Sullivan should be permitted to complete his review of the prosecutor’s actions and whether they are impermissible before deciding whether to grant the government’s motion to dismiss, citing the unusual circumstances of the Justice Department’s “abrupt reversal on the facts and the law” and the opacity of what happened.

In a dissenting opinion, he said his colleagues had made a series of mistakes that rendered a “dead letter” the portion of the rule of criminal procedure that said cases may only be dismissed with a judge’s approval, or “leave of the court” — at least in cases where the defense and prosecution agrees that a case should be dropped.

Instead, he argued, the law requires that Judge Sullivan be permitted to rule — and if Mr. Flynn and the Justice Department do not like what he decides, they can then file an appeal.

“The district court must be given a reasonable opportunity to consider and hold a hearing on the government’s request to ensure that it is not clearly contrary to the public interest,” he wrote. “I therefore dissent.”

The ruling could effectively end the case, if Judge Sullivan acquiesces. But even if he instead asks the full appeals court to vacate the order and rehear the matter — or the full court decides to intervene on its own — the ruling seemed likely at a minimum to disrupt his plan to hold a hearing on July 16 on whether to dismiss the case.

The outsider whom Judge Sullivan had appointed to critique the Justice Department motion — John Gleeson, a former federal judge — had argued that its arguments for dropping the case were baseless and a “pretext” for an illegitimate political intervention on behalf of a presidential favorite, and urged Judge Sullivan to instead sentence Mr. Flynn.'>>>

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/24/us/politics/michael-flynn-appeals-court.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
4. Some systems are functonal but the tRUMP/reTHUG system was developed and is administered in
Wed Jun 24, 2020, 01:45 PM
Jun 2020

Dysfunction Junction*...

* to Conjunction Junction from Sesame Street

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How can this be how the s...