General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMarie Marie
(11,172 posts)dem4decades
(13,959 posts)sweetloukillbot
(12,744 posts)Sanity Claws
(22,401 posts)Ding- ding!!
Renew Deal
(84,929 posts)tishaLA
(14,763 posts)if he wants to be a MAGAt, he should go for it, but he shouldn't do it with the pretense that he's some kind of benign observer when it turns out he was basically a co-author of that toothless executive order.
What makes it even worse IMO was that CNN couldn't even be bothered to make a statement about the obvious conflict of interest. And the fact that it happened only a couple hours after we learned that the Washington Post had killed a story * by Bob Woodward* in which he exposed Bart O'Kavanaugh as a lying hack? Sad day for journalism.
mahina
(20,593 posts)Surely not Van Jones
tishaLA
(14,763 posts)spooky3
(38,524 posts)woman voted? Even if she claimed she voted for Clinton in 2016, can anyone audit that?
In any case, he should have disclosed his role in the policy writing.
SharonClark
(10,497 posts)How many organizations has he started and then abandoned as he moves on? What qualified him to work on green issues in the Obama administration?
DemocratSinceBirth
(101,821 posts)BannonsLiver
(20,466 posts)samsingh
(18,396 posts)TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)jrthin
(5,218 posts)Van Jones was just an analysis for the story he reported. They should have told us that he WROTE the story.