Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,863 posts)
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 07:04 PM Jun 2020

'No consensus' in intelligence community over Russia bounty on U.S. troops report, White House says

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump had not been briefed on reports that Russia was behind bounty payments to Taliban-linked militants over successful attacks on coalition troops because there were "dissenting opinions" within the U.S. intelligence community over the veracity of the reports, a White House spokeswoman said Monday.

"There is no consensus within the intelligence community on these allegations and in effect there are dissenting opinions from some in the intelligence community with regards to the veracity of what's being reported," White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said at a briefing with reporters. "The veracity of the underlying allegations continue to be evaluated."

The White House briefed members of Congress over the intelligence reports Monday, McEnany told reporters.

Lawmakers had pressed the administration for more details after the New York Times reported Friday that Trump was informed months ago that a Russian intelligence unit offered secret cash payments to Taliban-linked militants to kill coalition troops, including Americans.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/no-consensus-in-intelligence-community-over-russia-bounty-on-us-troops-report-white-house-says/ar-BB1676UT?li=BBnb7Kz

He's just full of excuses.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'No consensus' in intelligence community over Russia bounty on U.S. troops report, White House says (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2020 OP
There never is a 100% consensus on most things, the amount of double talk here is gobsmacking uponit7771 Jun 2020 #1
My interpretation Zorro Jun 2020 #2
WH briefed both Democrats and Republicans? . . . Iliyah Jun 2020 #3
They're saying Steny Hoyer was notified but didn't respond Zorro Jun 2020 #4
Smells like crap . . Iliyah Jun 2020 #6
Wapo - 'bounties . . . resulted in deaths of U.S. troops' empedocles Jun 2020 #5
LOL Skittles Jun 2020 #7
Not the response of someone who cares about Americans, especially in the military unblock Jun 2020 #8
So the Trump circus denies the allegations. Interesting. John Fante Jun 2020 #9
If the info was in a PDB, he was expected to know sanatanadharma Jun 2020 #10

Zorro

(15,733 posts)
2. My interpretation
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 07:07 PM
Jun 2020

The political appointees in the intel community dispute the veracity of the reports.

The newly appointed DNI John Ratcliffe has already said Trump wasn't briefed, although he was nowhere on the NSC scene when this information was presented.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
3. WH briefed both Democrats and Republicans? . . .
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 07:07 PM
Jun 2020

House???????? but did not invite Democrats to the WH for a meeting concerning this?

Yeah right. Liars.

Zorro

(15,733 posts)
4. They're saying Steny Hoyer was notified but didn't respond
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 07:11 PM
Jun 2020

That's how they're going to spin the absence of Democrats.

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
5. Wapo - 'bounties . . . resulted in deaths of U.S. troops'
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 07:16 PM
Jun 2020

'WAPO GETS IN ON IT: “Russian bounties to Taliban-linked militants resulted in deaths of U.S. troops, according to intelligence assessments,” by Ellen Nakashima, Karen DeYoung, Missy Ryan and John Hudson: “Russian bounties offered to Taliban-linked militants to kill coalition forces in Afghanistan are believed to have resulted in the deaths of several U.S. service members, according to intelligence gleaned from U.S. military interrogations of captured militants in recent months.' - Politico Playbook, 6-29-2020

unblock

(52,181 posts)
8. Not the response of someone who cares about Americans, especially in the military
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 07:54 PM
Jun 2020

Even assuming there's some doubt, the correct answer is more like:

"they better not have!"

John Fante

(3,479 posts)
9. So the Trump circus denies the allegations. Interesting.
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 08:15 PM
Jun 2020

Its a good thing no one within that administration has a molecule of credibility. People might actually believe this steaming pile of bullshit otherwise.

sanatanadharma

(3,694 posts)
10. If the info was in a PDB, he was expected to know
Mon Jun 29, 2020, 09:18 PM
Jun 2020

The PDB is prepared for the purpose of telling the PRESIDENT something.
The PDB can say maybe/maybe not, but it can't be said that info in the PDB was withheld from trump.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'No consensus' in intelli...