General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLindsey Graham catches the vapors over the prospect of D.C. statehood
WASHINGTON, D.C. (WCBD) On Monday, Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) commented on recent legislation passed by the House of Representatives that would grant statehood to Washington, DC.
The legislation would elevate DC to a state and provide its residents with two voting members in the US Senate. Graham said that these two members, whom he assumes will be Democrats, would (cancel) out the votes of a state like South Carolina with two Republican Senators.
Graham described the move as a brazen power grab by the Democratic Party to change the makeup of Congress in a manner that is detrimental to South Carolina and every other state. He said that DC was established as a neutral venue to conduct the affairs of the nation, and therefore, the effort, on its face, is unconstitutional. ............(more)
https://www.counton2.com/news/south-carolina-news/lindsey-graham-dc-statehood-is-a-threat-to-sc/
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,783 posts)Statehood for D.C. despite what Lady G says.
Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)And I don't want to hear about power grabs from republicans.
elleng
(130,865 posts)but it has become also a residential site, wherein residents pay more in taxes than those in several states.
Sorry, lindsey
RDANGELO
(3,433 posts)Alaska
North Dakota
South Dakota
Wyoming
Montana
Vermont
All of them are Republican except for Vermont.
lame54
(35,284 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)captain queeg
(10,169 posts)Seems appropriate theyd have the same representation. The world changes, as does the US.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,489 posts)D.C. population: 706,000
Wyoming population: 579,000
Vermont population: 624,000
North Dakota: 762,000
Kind of takes the wind out of Lindsey's sails.........
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)pecosbob
(7,536 posts)It might be said given their record on vote suppression and Jim Crow, etc, that the citizens of South Carolina do not deserve two Senators.
Xolodno
(6,390 posts)...we simply added an amendment to allow a DC Representative to have full voting privileges in the House.
But the GOP made damn sure it never happened. It's not like there ever is close vote in the House, usually one side or the other had more than enough votes. So it was really silly to deny DC. And now, here we are.
Retrograde
(10,133 posts)the votes of my two Democratic senators.
(I'd actually like to see the District - with the exception of the core government buildings around the Capitol and White House) revert to Maryland. There's precedent for doing that without a constitutional amendment. Lindsey is still an idiot, though.)
denbot
(9,899 posts)Go ahead and alert. Ive been on this board since 01, and Ill be here after the last troll leaves..
struggle4progress
(118,277 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,338 posts)Then residents would have representation, Maryland would probably pick up a (D) representative.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)mshasta
(2,108 posts)ooohhh the horrors
Happy Hoosier
(7,285 posts)... is allowing them to maintain a level of of political power that is not even close to commensurate with how the public votes. This is their only path to maintaining political power.