Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court allows Trump administration to resume federal executions after 17-year pause
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to resume federal executions after 17-year pause
Hunter
Daily Kos Staff
Tuesday June 30, 2020 · 1:01 PM EDT
Though it was buried in yet another frantic news day, on Monday the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to resume federal executions by letting stand an appeals court ruling allowing the same. After a 17-year pause, the 60 prisoners on federal death row will now face new execution dates.
It was Attorney General William Barr, of course, who had indicated that his department would be lifting the hiatus. The death penalty remains a staple of "tough on crime" conservatism despite both the cost and ineffectiveness as deterrent; surely, there is no political stance quite as manly as demanding the death of criminals.
The details of the challenges now swept aside by the Supreme Court deal with the method of execution. The letter of the law requires federal executions to be conducted according to the laws of the state the sentencing took place in, but in multiple states execution by lethal injection, the most popular method, has been put on hold because drug companies have refused to allow states to purchase their products for the purpose of killing people. (Bad publicity.) Barr instead announced that the federal government would be using a different drug, pentobarbital, regardless of state protocols. An appeals court and the Supreme Court have now green-lit that approach.
Barr's eagerness to resume state-sponsored killings is unsurprising, given his conservatism, his well-known religious fervor, and his seeming obsession with the same tenets of authoritarian rule that have governed all other dealings. It is likely he wants to be able to execute people before the November elections, to give "tough on crime" conservatives a little pick-me-up helping to justify reelecting a "delusional" idiot manchild. (Spare me the faux outrage, every conservative "pundit." Any claim that Barr is handling his office in an apolitical fashion is at this point so absurd that it would require hosing down your pants before saying it, just to avoid the subsequent severe burns.)
more...
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/6/30/1957188/-Supreme-Court-allows-Trump-administration-to-resume-federal-executions-after-17-year-pause
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 1234 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to resume federal executions after 17-year pause (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2020
OP
PTWB
(4,131 posts)1. They'll be hanging people when the drug supply dries up.
C_U_L8R
(45,001 posts)2. What's the penalty for treason?
Celerity
(43,339 posts)3. 18 U.S. Code § 2381.Treason
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381#:~:text=Whoever%2C%20owing%20allegiance%20to%20the,not%20less%20than%20%2410%2C000%3B%20and
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)
C_U_L8R
(45,001 posts)4. I wonder if Trump feels lucky or not
Celerity
(43,339 posts)5. he and about 25 or so (a guess) others deserve to be executed after a fair and just trial
I normally am totally against the death penalty, but make exceptions for crimes against humanity on a global basis (ie. the Nuremberg precedent.)
Absolutely Rump himself, Ivanka, Jared, Don Jr, Eric, Miller, Moscow Mitch and many of his cabinet (beginning with Barr), for starters.
All his wealth/property needs to be seized and Melania and her grifter, chain-migrated family need to be stripped of citizenship and ALL assets/monies, and shipped back to Slovenia. Melania can support them but working on her back, which is all the brass knows how to do.
mvd
(65,173 posts)7. I'm completely against it, but..
Trump has committed treason IMO and if he is so rule of law, he cant complain if execution is an option for him.
dalton99a
(81,475 posts)6. Perhaps Trump will do live broadcasts of federal executions
the likes of which the world has never seen before
Nevilledog
(51,094 posts)9. They'd be the most beautiful. Everybody says so.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,853 posts)8. I keep on wondering which other of the 10 Commandments they think
don't need to be kept.
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)10. Trump and Barr must be chomping at the bit...