Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,059 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 10:54 PM Jun 2020

Supreme Court allows Trump administration to resume federal executions after 17-year pause



Supreme Court allows Trump administration to resume federal executions after 17-year pause
Hunter
Daily Kos Staff
Tuesday June 30, 2020 · 1:01 PM EDT


Though it was buried in yet another frantic news day, on Monday the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to resume federal executions by letting stand an appeals court ruling allowing the same. After a 17-year pause, the 60 prisoners on federal death row will now face new execution dates.

It was Attorney General William Barr, of course, who had indicated that his department would be lifting the hiatus. The death penalty remains a staple of "tough on crime" conservatism despite both the cost and ineffectiveness as deterrent; surely, there is no political stance quite as manly as demanding the death of criminals.

The details of the challenges now swept aside by the Supreme Court deal with the method of execution. The letter of the law requires federal executions to be conducted according to the laws of the state the sentencing took place in, but in multiple states execution by lethal injection, the most popular method, has been put on hold because drug companies have refused to allow states to purchase their products for the purpose of killing people. (Bad publicity.) Barr instead announced that the federal government would be using a different drug, pentobarbital, regardless of state protocols. An appeals court and the Supreme Court have now green-lit that approach.

Barr's eagerness to resume state-sponsored killings is unsurprising, given his conservatism, his well-known religious fervor, and his seeming obsession with the same tenets of authoritarian rule that have governed all other dealings. It is likely he wants to be able to execute people before the November elections, to give "tough on crime" conservatives a little pick-me-up helping to justify reelecting a "delusional" idiot manchild. (Spare me the faux outrage, every conservative "pundit." Any claim that Barr is handling his office in an apolitical fashion is at this point so absurd that it would require hosing down your pants before saying it, just to avoid the subsequent severe burns.)

more...

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/6/30/1957188/-Supreme-Court-allows-Trump-administration-to-resume-federal-executions-after-17-year-pause
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court allows Trump administration to resume federal executions after 17-year pause (Original Post) babylonsister Jun 2020 OP
They'll be hanging people when the drug supply dries up. PTWB Jun 2020 #1
What's the penalty for treason? C_U_L8R Jun 2020 #2
18 U.S. Code § 2381.Treason Celerity Jun 2020 #3
I wonder if Trump feels lucky or not C_U_L8R Jun 2020 #4
he and about 25 or so (a guess) others deserve to be executed after a fair and just trial Celerity Jun 2020 #5
I'm completely against it, but.. mvd Jun 2020 #7
Perhaps Trump will do live broadcasts of federal executions dalton99a Jun 2020 #6
They'd be the most beautiful. Everybody says so. Nevilledog Jul 2020 #9
I keep on wondering which other of the 10 Commandments they think PoindexterOglethorpe Jul 2020 #8
Trump and Barr must be chomping at the bit... Wounded Bear Jul 2020 #10

Celerity

(43,339 posts)
3. 18 U.S. Code § 2381.Treason
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:15 PM
Jun 2020
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381#:~:text=Whoever%2C%20owing%20allegiance%20to%20the,not%20less%20than%20%2410%2C000%3B%20and

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.


(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

Celerity

(43,339 posts)
5. he and about 25 or so (a guess) others deserve to be executed after a fair and just trial
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:30 PM
Jun 2020

I normally am totally against the death penalty, but make exceptions for crimes against humanity on a global basis (ie. the Nuremberg precedent.)

Absolutely Rump himself, Ivanka, Jared, Don Jr, Eric, Miller, Moscow Mitch and many of his cabinet (beginning with Barr), for starters.

All his wealth/property needs to be seized and Melania and her grifter, chain-migrated family need to be stripped of citizenship and ALL assets/monies, and shipped back to Slovenia. Melania can support them but working on her back, which is all the brass knows how to do.

mvd

(65,173 posts)
7. I'm completely against it, but..
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:45 PM
Jun 2020

Trump has committed treason IMO and if he is so “rule of law,” he can’t complain if execution is an option for him.

dalton99a

(81,475 posts)
6. Perhaps Trump will do live broadcasts of federal executions
Tue Jun 30, 2020, 11:36 PM
Jun 2020

the likes of which the world has never seen before


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court allows Trum...