General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump faces a now historical disadvantage
(CNN)Poll of the week: A new Monmouth University poll finds former Vice President Joe Biden with a 53% to 41% lead over President Donald Trump.
The average live interview poll conducted over the last month has Biden ahead by a similar 11-point margin.
What's the point: Usually, this is the point where someone like myself says we have four months to go until the election and polls are a snapshot in time. Both of those statements are true, but they obscure an important fact.
Polls taken around Independence Day in an election year are actually pretty highly correlated with the November results in incumbent contests. That means Trump is in a lot of trouble.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/05/politics/polls-july-analysis/index.html
BootinUp
(47,094 posts)BamaRefugee
(3,483 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,715 posts)That this is key in winning.
Glorfindel
(9,720 posts)And three two-term presidents in a row only twice.
Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)And it sucks. In 2016 he had no record, no political record at least. He said, what do you have to lose by voting for me? And many people bought it. Some because of the many subtle nods he gave to white supremacist. The others out of the sheer novelty of his candidacy.
But now it's different. He has demonstrated repeatedly how incompetent he is. He has been forced to give more direct acknowledgement to the white supremacist crowd, which pushes away a number of previous supporters.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)He even regrets criminal justice reform.
Scoop: Trump regrets Kushner advice on prison reform
Behind the scenes: One person who spoke with the president interpreted his thinking this way: "No more of Jared's woke s***." Another said Trump has indicated that following Kushner's advice has harmed him politically.
Why it matters: This could be the final straw for federal police reform legislation this year, and it could usher in even more incendiary campaign tactics between now and November.
Details: The sources said the president has resolved to stick to his instincts and jettison any policies that go against them, including ambitious police reform.
https://www.axios.com/trump-kushner-second-thoughts-408d5a33-725d-442a-88e4-d6ab6742c139.html
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)What he doesn't realize about his instincts, is that people know him now. So there is no longer a benefit of the doubt.
What I think is ironic is that Trump could have pivoted to the center, listened to his advisors about covid-19 and put us in a better place than we are now and he would probably be in a decent spot to get reelected. But he has done the opposite.
Straw Man
(6,622 posts)What must be remembered is that he is not driven by political concerns, but by malignant narcissism. Any effort to moderate his behavior in order to placate or attract some segment of the electorate would be tantamount to admitting that his prior utterances and actions were anything short of "perfect," something that he is incapable of doing.
He is doubling down with the core of his base because they are the only ones who uncritically adore him. That adoration is what he craves, and that will be his undoing -- I hope.
Just crying "fake news" all the time isn't going to carry water anymore. Many people who staunchly supported him in 2016 are now unemployed.
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)After he won I thought, how bad could it possibly be. I was even willing to give him the benefit of a doubt because he said he was going to improve healthcare and infrastructure. He even signaled that he might let marijuana be legalized. He did none of that.. But he has been 10 times worse than I even thought.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)When he was in Arizona and he called Mexicans "rapists" and what frightened me was not that he said it but that the crowd cheered. I was scared of a rising far right nationalist movement but I listened to 538 and underrated Trump's chances for the primary.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)Does everybody in Congress, senate, and any very high officials have to reveal who they voted for? I mean if they say they are supporting trump can they get away with putting someone else instead?
tblue37
(65,227 posts)unless we want to reveal them
Doreen
(11,686 posts)Talk like they support trump then silently vote for someone else.
tblue37
(65,227 posts)Doreen
(11,686 posts)If he lost then they could admit it.
MiniMe
(21,709 posts)No supporting backup to that number, but that's what he says.
ProfessorGAC
(64,877 posts)The lead is 2x the missing respondents.
These numbers add to 94. So, assuming it carries forward, it would take all 6% to go PINO, and the entire MOE has to be consumed.
All that said, I still think it's early.
But, come Labor Day, if the numbers are like this, I'll start exhaling.
bucolic_frolic
(43,064 posts)Trump will be extra nasty, crooked, and cheat all he can to try to move those numbers.
Usually there is a large block of undecideds, with candidates both polling in the 40s. Rare, and I don't remember any pollls over the last 40 years where either candidate regularly topped 50% for an extended period.
Aside from Electoral College, over 50% is a winner in a democracy. Majority. Not a plurality.
stillcool
(32,626 posts)all they need is the perception that someone is taking votes from Biden, and they can make it a reality of the mind. Cable TV will be all over it 24/7, with hand-wringing and cries of all that Biden is doing wrong, and how we're all doomed. They've got to put on a convincing show, but apparently for many in this country, that isn't too difficult. What am I saying...no one will fall for that bullshit
AllyCat
(16,152 posts)Polls had HRC ahead too. And yet, here we are.
Preference falsification, or the similar Bradley effect
cannabis_flower
(3,764 posts)Had Hillary this far ahead. I don't think she was ever over 50%. I believe it was always something like 48%-43%.
AllyCat
(16,152 posts)I do not trust Trumputin at all. Vote. Work for Biden. Get people registered to vote. Take people to the polls.
SiliconValley_Dem
(1,656 posts)MickieDalton
(10 posts)Elections are no longer decided by the people who vote, but by the people who actually run things. These include President of the United States Vladimir Putin (via his puppy, Trump), major corporations, the Koch comrades and a few others of the 1%. Hundreds of thousands of voters are being purged from the rolls, voting booths removed from Democrat-voting areas, the voting machines have been shown again and again to be hacked as easily as opening the fridge door and the hackers are all warming up to their job in the USA and in Moscow. The powers that be need drumpf in the WH for a few more years and they sure as hell are not going to allow him to be voted out of office by actual American citizens.
Trump will somehow be "re-elected" later this year and regardless of how obviously corrupt the "election" will be, this Supreme Court of Whores will endorse him.
Martin Eden
(12,847 posts)20% is too much support for this treasonous deplorable con man.