Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFlorida voters with felony convictions ask justices to intervene in voting-rights dispute
Florida voters with felony convictions ask justices to intervene in voting-rights dispute
Posted Wed, July 8th, 2020 11:10 pm by Amy Howe
With the deadline to register to vote in Floridas August primary election 12 days away, a group of Florida voters and civil rights groups today asked the Supreme Court to reinstate a ruling by a federal trial court that struck down a state law that requires Florida residents who have been convicted of a felony to pay all court fees and costs before voting. An order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit that put the trial courts ruling on hold, the voters argue, creates chaos and confusion about who can and cannot vote, where a wrong guess creates the risk of criminal prosecution. The potential impact of the Supreme Courts ruling is immense, the voters add, for three-quarters of a million Floridians who may now be uncertain about their eligibility to vote as a result of the 11th Circuits order.
In November 2018, voters in Florida adopted an amendment to the states constitution that allows people with prior felony convictions to vote once they complete all terms of their sentence including parole or probation. Seven months later, the states legislature passed a law that conditioned the right to vote for former felons on the payment of all court costs, fees and fines. Voters challenged the law, arguing (among other things) that it is unconstitutional because it discriminates on the basis of wealth. A federal district court agreed and temporarily blocked the state from enforcing the law. The 11th Circuit upheld that ruling in February.
After a trial, the district court issued a new ruling in May that concluded that the law also violates the U.S. Constitutions 24th Amendment, which bans poll taxes. Moreover, the district court added, it could take years for the state to determine how much would-be voters must pay before they can vote which in turn deters voters from registering at all, out of fear they will be charged with voter fraud if they make a mistake. Florida appealed again to the 11th Circuit, which on July 1 granted the states request to have the full court hear the case and to put the district courts ruling on hold while the appeals proceed.
In their filing today, the voters urged the Supreme Court to lift the 11th Circuits stay and reinstate the district courts ruling. Citing the courts 2006 decision in Purcell v. Gonzalez, which stands for the principle that courts should be wary about making changes in the run-up to an election, the voters complained that the 11th Circuits order has created triple the confusion and consequent incentive to remain away from the polls as the Supreme Court found in Purcell. And it did so, the voters continued, just three weeks before the registration deadline for the August primary and after vote-by-mail applications were already received and just as ballots were mailed to overseas voters. The Florida primary is on Aug. 18, and the registration deadline is July 20.
[...]
Posted Wed, July 8th, 2020 11:10 pm by Amy Howe
With the deadline to register to vote in Floridas August primary election 12 days away, a group of Florida voters and civil rights groups today asked the Supreme Court to reinstate a ruling by a federal trial court that struck down a state law that requires Florida residents who have been convicted of a felony to pay all court fees and costs before voting. An order by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit that put the trial courts ruling on hold, the voters argue, creates chaos and confusion about who can and cannot vote, where a wrong guess creates the risk of criminal prosecution. The potential impact of the Supreme Courts ruling is immense, the voters add, for three-quarters of a million Floridians who may now be uncertain about their eligibility to vote as a result of the 11th Circuits order.
In November 2018, voters in Florida adopted an amendment to the states constitution that allows people with prior felony convictions to vote once they complete all terms of their sentence including parole or probation. Seven months later, the states legislature passed a law that conditioned the right to vote for former felons on the payment of all court costs, fees and fines. Voters challenged the law, arguing (among other things) that it is unconstitutional because it discriminates on the basis of wealth. A federal district court agreed and temporarily blocked the state from enforcing the law. The 11th Circuit upheld that ruling in February.
After a trial, the district court issued a new ruling in May that concluded that the law also violates the U.S. Constitutions 24th Amendment, which bans poll taxes. Moreover, the district court added, it could take years for the state to determine how much would-be voters must pay before they can vote which in turn deters voters from registering at all, out of fear they will be charged with voter fraud if they make a mistake. Florida appealed again to the 11th Circuit, which on July 1 granted the states request to have the full court hear the case and to put the district courts ruling on hold while the appeals proceed.
In their filing today, the voters urged the Supreme Court to lift the 11th Circuits stay and reinstate the district courts ruling. Citing the courts 2006 decision in Purcell v. Gonzalez, which stands for the principle that courts should be wary about making changes in the run-up to an election, the voters complained that the 11th Circuits order has created triple the confusion and consequent incentive to remain away from the polls as the Supreme Court found in Purcell. And it did so, the voters continued, just three weeks before the registration deadline for the August primary and after vote-by-mail applications were already received and just as ballots were mailed to overseas voters. The Florida primary is on Aug. 18, and the registration deadline is July 20.
[...]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 327 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post