Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,783 posts)
1. Nor should ED meds be covered....
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 11:55 AM
Jul 2020

If women cannot be covered from getting knocked up, nor should men be covered for being able to get it up.

Sorry for the crude analogy. This is about CONTROL of women's bodies and decisions made for medical reasons as well.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
4. Just for fun, how about the argument that...
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:03 PM
Jul 2020

ED meds fix something that's wrong with the body, while contraception interferes with how the body is supposed to work.

Don't shoot me-- I'm just proposing that for the sake of discussion. Why is, or isn't, it a valid argument? It will come up at some point, if it hasn't already.

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,783 posts)
5. The counter argument will be for Contraception.....
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:08 PM
Jul 2020

Based on medical fact that using Contraception....

1) Regulates hormal balances so that the body CAN work as it should...

2) Helps with women who suffers from Migranes.

3) Deals with Endometriosis and Uterine cysts.

4) Stymie Ovarian disfunction.

Using ED meds for men is opening blood vessels important for achieving erections.

blueinredohio

(6,797 posts)
8. I agree wholeheartedly.
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:13 PM
Jul 2020

Also Wouldn't covering birth control be a lot cheaper than paying a delivery bill and insuring a child for eighteen years?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
12. That's one reason most employer plans won't deny contraceptives. The other is, most employers aren't
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:31 PM
Jul 2020

into the politics of contraception, abortions, etc.

unc70

(6,110 posts)
9. Almost no insurance covers ED drugs
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:14 PM
Jul 2020

Even when required as follow up treatment for prostate cancer. Generic prescriptions run $800/year or more. I strongly support full coverage of birth control and of ED.

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,315 posts)
2. Hobby Lobby said the "sincerely held beliefs" of the owner of the employing company was
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 11:57 AM
Jul 2020

an acceptable level for an exemption. This decision holds that the religious or moral values of the employing organization are enough for an exemption. Hobby Lobby, the owner didn't like birth control. In Little Sisters, the Little Sisters of the Poor don't like birth control.

moose65

(3,166 posts)
6. That sounds crazy to me
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:11 PM
Jul 2020

They don't think that married women should have access to contraceptives?? Don't they know that women take contraceptives for other reasons besides birth control?

It is just SO weird to me that these people who usually preach about personal responsibility don't think that the womenfolk have the good sense to decide what is right for their own bodies. Boggles the mind.

Also, they would NEVER deny a man any kind of treatment for anything.

unblock

(52,181 posts)
3. My understanding was the hobby lobby case only dealt with private companies
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:00 PM
Jul 2020

This latest case holds for public companies as well, afaik

unblock

(52,181 posts)
16. not likely, but i haven't found anything in any article that says that matters.
Fri Jul 10, 2020, 12:43 PM
Jul 2020

i haven't read the opinion, but the media coverage suggests it applies more generally.

dsc

(52,155 posts)
10. Trump expanded the rule
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:16 PM
Jul 2020

Under the first rule, a business could refuse but had to let the government know they refused so other arrangements could be made and the employee would still get the BC. Trump's rule ditches the need to notify and thus the employee doesn't get the BC. Also Trump expanded who gets to object so that one only had to have a moral objection not a religious one.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,109 posts)
11. Great news for me, however...my religion says heart attacks and cancer
Thu Jul 9, 2020, 12:20 PM
Jul 2020

are caused by your interaction with the devil so my 2000 employees now have NO coverage for either.

Lowers my premiums a bunch, as you can imagine...and being a rightwing pretend xtian, I cant WAIT for them to start dying.


THAT is what this is about.

ABSURD they would make this ruling...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The rule about employer p...