Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDr. Scott Gottlieb estimates as many as 1 in 150 people in U.S. are infected with coronavirus
CNBC
PUBLISHED FRI, JUL 10 2020
9:25 AM EDT UPDATED 3 HOURS AGO
Kevin Stankiewicz
Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC on Friday he believes there continues to be a significant number of unreported coronavirus cases in the U.S., suggesting as many as 1 in 150 people in the country could be infected.
We must have well over 700,000 infections a day, even though were only diagnosing about 60,000, Gottlieb said on Squawk Box. Before, when we had come down, and we were sort of burning around 20,000 diagnosed infections a day, the conventional wisdom was the prevalence was 1 in 200 people. Now, it must be higher than that.
Gottliebs comments come as the U.S. continues to report record, or near record, levels of daily new infections. While the increase can be partly attributed to added testing capacity, the overall rate of positive tests in the country also is increasing. That is an indication of growing community spread.
Its going to be hard to get to a point where you could youre not going to eliminate the infection but get it down to levels that are much, much lower, said the former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration. The prevalence of actual infection in the country right now must be pretty high.
We must have well over 700,000 infections a day, even though were only diagnosing about 60,000, Gottlieb said on Squawk Box. Before, when we had come down, and we were sort of burning around 20,000 diagnosed infections a day, the conventional wisdom was the prevalence was 1 in 200 people. Now, it must be higher than that.
Gottliebs comments come as the U.S. continues to report record, or near record, levels of daily new infections. While the increase can be partly attributed to added testing capacity, the overall rate of positive tests in the country also is increasing. That is an indication of growing community spread.
Its going to be hard to get to a point where you could youre not going to eliminate the infection but get it down to levels that are much, much lower, said the former commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration. The prevalence of actual infection in the country right now must be pretty high.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/10/dr-scott-gottlieb-on-coronavirus-infection-levels-in-the-us.html?__source=twitter%7Cmain
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 540 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dr. Scott Gottlieb estimates as many as 1 in 150 people in U.S. are infected with coronavirus (Original Post)
Mike 03
Jul 2020
OP
SammyWinstonJack
(44,130 posts)1. Horrific.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)2. So we are at
or near Critical Mass in numbers. Which means this Pandemic will gain speed and as the Virus Mutates,it appears to be more lethal.
LeftInTX
(25,220 posts)3. Hmmm??
We have already surpassed that number in confirmed cases....
We are shortly heading to 1% of the population.
We're at .927% of the population already.
1 in 150 is .666% of the population.
ProfessorGAC
(64,988 posts)4. Beat Me To It!
It's around 1 in 110 that we already know.
Wonder if this was supposed to be 1 in 15.
That would square with the 700,000 number in the OP.
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)5. Same math as you, holds up!
Too high a guestimate on daily infections, when 3x that number is the actual # of infections if it was his 1 in 150?
Send the Dr. back for remedial arithmetic?
Goodheart
(5,318 posts)6. Saw that immediately, so knew somebody would point it out.