General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFor President Biden - US Grant REVOKED pardons granted by Andrew Johnson
Last edited Wed Jul 15, 2020, 08:05 PM - Edit history (1)
Grant did this on his 3rd day in office. It was challenged in court and Grant won his case. So, Biden could revoke the commutation of Stone's sentence, as well as other corrupt pardons.
https://swampland.time.com/2008/12/25/more-on-pardons/
Ulysses S. Grants first clemency decision, on his third day in office, was to revoke two pardons granted by Andrew Johnson. Both men challenged Grants power to do so, and lost their case in federal court.
Grant also revoked the pardon of James F. Martin, but the New York Times, reported that the official order from the State Department reached the U.S. Marshal in Massachusetts too late. That is to say, Martin had accepted his pardon and had exited the premises. No effort was made to put him back.
tritsofme
(17,371 posts)And were subsequently withdrawn.
The clemency for Stone has been executed, it cannot be reversed.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)was that the pardons from Johnson (not Jackson) were received by the prison warden, but sat in his desk. So, they should have been official pardons.
tritsofme
(17,371 posts)Regardless, the peculiarities that Grant faced do not apply to Trumps pardons or commutations, especially not of Stone.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)'
Trump's pardon power is not absolute
maskling
Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)
Tuesday July 14, 2020 · 12:37 PM EDT
Recommend 9 Share Tweet20 Comments 20 New
RSS
PUBLISHED TO
maskling
TAGS
Law
Share this article
according to this interesting article at The Atlantic:
www.theatlantic.com/
Maybe he cant pardon his fellow racketeers. Some interesting quotes from the article:
'The power to grant pardons and reprieves includes the power to commute, or reduce, sentences after convictions. But this power is constrained by a limit: except in cases of impeachment.
the Constitutions Framers were deeply concerned about presidents abusing power to protect co-conspirators. As just one example, regarding treason, the Virginia delegate Edmund Randolph voiced a concern at the Constitutional Convention that the prerogative of pardon in these cases was too great a trust. The President may himself be guilty. The Traytors may be his own instruments.
As even President Richard Nixons Office of Legal Counsel recognized, the Constitution does not allow a president to issue a self-pardon. These values point toward our reading of the pardon power, which limits the supposed prerogative of impeached presidents to pardon co-conspirators connected to their impeachment.
Read the whole thing!
Im not a Kawnstitushanal Squalor, so i dont have anything really substantive to add to their line of legal thinking. But as an asker of interesting questions, it would probably be worth asking, Who would have standing to challenge Stones pardon in court?
Put some fear into these rats, thats the point. And you might even win the case by accident, putting the fear into future authoritarians.'
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/7/14/1960669/...
1 day ago · The power to grant pardons and reprieves includes the power to commute, or reduce, sentences after convictions. But this power is constrained
'
Response to NewJeffCT (Original post)
Wednesdays This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)Such action would make folks like us happy for awhile, but wont help move country forward long-term.
MyOwnPeace
(16,920 posts)Kinda' like what Gerald Ford said, and Nancy Pelosi took things "off of the table."
There are many who believe that such plans/actions are what led us to where we are now.
It must be important to establish the RULE OF LAW - no matter who gets their fingers smacked and who ends up spending time in jail.
Sorry - we cannot let it slide any more.........
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)From Nixon to Reagan to Bush Jr and now Trump, each GOP admin keeps getting more & more corrupt (and Bush Sr pardoned key Iran Contra figures) - if we don't put a hard stop to their BS, we'll just get somebody worse than trump next time around - maybe somebody reasonably smart and/or competent.
former9thward
(31,947 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)that were directly connected to Obama or Clinton. Seth Rich was a Democratic donor and was controversial, as was Chelsea Manning by Obama, but neither were direclty involved in Clinton or Obama operations like Flynn, Stone, Manafort, etc were with Trump
former9thward
(31,947 posts)That is pretty direct. Clinton pardoned his CIA Director, John Deutch. That is pretty direct. Clinton pardoned his HUD Secretary, Henry Cisneros. That is pretty direct. Clinton pardoned Marc Rich, a major Clinton fundraiser. That is pretty direct. He pardoned 12 high ranking officials of his Department of Agriculture. That is pretty direct.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_pardoned_by_Bill_Clinton
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)When the evidence continues to pile up, uncovering all the crimes against the people of America.
If we NEVER do anything about it, because by its very nature punishment is retrospective, they will be further emboldened to push the envelope.
Trump is the offspring of such indifference. Let's kick ass AND set a new course for the USA.