= new reply since forum marked as read
look at all the other swing states I am giving away, all those gone from our side, but still, we win. and Texas will get more EV's after the Census, more seats in the House, and multiple ones of those swing states I gave to the Rethinks will LOSE EV's.
Want to stop a Rethug from ever winning the POTUS again? Skim out excess LW and Democratic population from deep Blue states, and have them flood into TX and FL by the millions and shift those 2 sates perma Blue. Have Dem-friendly billionaires help do this. The Great Blue Shift.
IF FL also goes perma Blue then it is game over, as I can then (on top of all the other swing states I tossed away above) also turn CO, MN, NH, and NV red, and we still win.
I know your whole point here is to try to imply I'm a Republican.
But Axios is not a right wing publication. And this is their headline.
Sometimes you just gotta accept when your shots don't land. The insult just doesn't work. 
both-sides -- Nancy wants Republican presidents so they'll veto the ACA with a public option in the future (the one she got through the House and then by a miracle the compromised one the Senate passed) and all the other progressive policies that are now sitting on McConnell's desk, because she's been a secret Republican this whole time. I KNEW IT! Finally, the truth is revealed. I will never vote again for this corrupt rigged system. Thank you, Axios!"
And suddenly, questioning a source is bad.
Seems like that's what I heard when I watched the video.
and responded to a response to my comment. Yes I viewed the video and that is what she said. It's my opinion that all republicans are the same and have no interest in the governance of our country. I yearn for republicans to become extinct, not for republicans of the past who got us where we are today. YMMV
47. So you really think that Pelosi today said that she "yearns" for another republican president?
Did you not view the video in the article? Is that what she said?
Yes, that's part of what she said. Duh. 
you should go and do an OP and break down every sentence she spoke. Someone may be interested in that. 
But I have some time so I decided to comment on what Nancy had to say. 
Because that's what I heard her say. If you want to break down everything she said then by all means do an OP breaking it down. Also, I never implied that she wanted future republicans. When the words "Richard Nixon " followed that sentence it was obvious what she was talking about. Myself? I don't miss the past republicans or their governance and sure as the fuck won't yearn for them.
The headline very clearly does not misrepresent what she said.
Those were her words. Headlines are typically not a complete speech or interview but nice try. ....this is an obvious attempt to misrepresent or mischaracterize what she said, made even more clear by many of the responses in this discussion.
I also NEVER said that the headline wasn't her words, but as I've said a number of times already, and now once again, that's just SIX words taken from what she said, there was a lot before those six words and a lot after that gave everyone interested a much different perspective. She was speaking comparatively about past republican presidents vs. the one we have now.
As I also said, this is yet another attempt to make Nancy Pelosi look bad. It's been done countless times, as it's been done to Chuck Schumer, Joe Biden, even Barack Obama and other DEMOCRATS.
I know what headlines are, and unfortunately the more negative they are about Democrats, false as they may be, the more people pounce on them as "gotchas".
Have a wonderful day. 
"It doesn't work that way George."
I'm sure.
....thank you.
