Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(50,956 posts)
Fri Jul 17, 2020, 12:51 PM Jul 2020

Australian researchers invent 20-minute coronavirus blood test


https://news.yahoo.com/australian-researchers-invent-20-minute-064725254.html

SYDNEY (Reuters) - Researchers in Australia have devised a test that can determine novel coronavirus infection in about 20 minutes using blood samples in what they say is a world-first breakthrough.

The researchers at Monash University said their test can determine if someone is currently infected and if they have been infected in the past.

"Short-term applications include rapid case identification and contact tracing to limit viral spread, while population screening to determine the extent of viral infection across communities is a longer-term need," the researchers said in a paper published in the journal ACS Sensors on Friday.

The research team was led by BioPRIA and Monash University’s Chemical Engineering Department, including researchers from the ARC Centre of Excellence in Convergent BioNano Science and Technology (CBNS).

*snip*
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Maru Kitteh

(28,313 posts)
1. That's about 5 teaspoons of blood.
Fri Jul 17, 2020, 12:55 PM
Jul 2020

Last edited Fri Jul 17, 2020, 01:26 PM - Edit history (1)

Hopefully they get the size of the blood sample down.


ON EDIT: DERP


Sometimes I need to slow it down when reading on small screens. Or just in general.


Aristus

(66,264 posts)
7. Speed isn't the issue.
Fri Jul 17, 2020, 01:26 PM
Jul 2020

We're using in clinic right now a 20-minute test with a nasopharyngeal swab.

What we need is increased sensitivity and specificity.

Fewer false negative and false positives.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
9. Because the test can see past infections, I'm guessing it's antibody-based.
Fri Jul 17, 2020, 01:27 PM
Jul 2020

And therefore very inaccurate, like all antibody tests I've ever seen.

On careful reading, it's looking for agglutination (clumping) of blood cells. I am aware of other factors that commonly cause agglutination: dehydration, high blood sugar being extremely common ones.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Australian researchers in...