General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNevilledog
(54,754 posts)jimfields33
(19,382 posts)But very clever.
leftieNanner
(16,132 posts)Oversight.
Wonder what this is in reference to - hearings?
stillcool
(34,407 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Compare them.
stillcool
(34,407 posts)the only "O" I came up with was an onion
The Velveteen Ocelot
(129,730 posts)Literally or figuratively.
SheltieLover
(78,258 posts)I'll bet they all cringe when she pulls out the whiteboard. 🤣
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)CurtEastPoint
(19,903 posts)💙 it!
FM123
(10,346 posts)Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)help companies/people get through the pandemic. Mnunchin, et al., was supposed to make those companies that got the loans or grants available for scrutiny, but they refused. Then, they said they'd allow them to see the companies info for loans over $150K. Katie Porter doesn't trust them, can you believe that?
I would say she is gigging them for the information. She apparently doesn't have all of what she wants yet.
Go, Katie!
Tech
(1,950 posts)His answers to his buddies and large companies getting the help, as small businesses are going under as "the money was gone". He stated the got some of the money back, but did not say what happened to that money. And he said they will get the money back if recipients can't prove it was not properly used. Well now, that really helps the people who have already lost their jobs, their businesses, their healthcare. And we know so many of the arrangements were made ahead of time by lawyers and accountants for these companies.
