Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Last-Ditch Effort to Stop Florida's Century-Old Campaign of Racist Disenfranchisement
5 hours ago
The Last-Ditch Effort to Stop Floridas Century-Old Campaign of Racist Disenfranchisement
Activists are raising money to help people convicted of felonies pay off their legal debts.
Abigail Weinberg
The Supreme Court struck a major blow against voting rights in Florida last week when it let stand a lower court decision that blocked as many as 1.4 million people who had previously been convicted of felonies from casting ballots until they pay all fines, court fees, and restitution. While the decision leaves intact a major financial barrier to voting, activists in the state are now banking on public support to help people pay down their legal debts and return to civic life.
The Supreme Courts decision centers around Floridas longstanding felon-disenfranchisement policy, whichas my colleague Ari Berman reported in 2018has an ugly, racist history and can apply to people convicted of relatively minor crimes:
According to the Brennan Center for Justice, Florida disenfranchises more citizens than Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee combined. Ten percent of the states adult population is ineligible to vote because of a criminal record, including 1 in 5 African Americans. Florida counts 533 different infractions as felonies, including crimes like disturbing a lobster trap and trespassing on a construction site. Come on Vacation, Leave on Probation is an unofficial slogan
After the Civil War, the white Confederates who still controlled Florida had a problem: The state had been forced to accept the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, which guaranteed equal rights for newly freed slaves, in order to rejoin the Union, and now black registered voters outnumbered white ones. White Floridians responded by adopting a constitution in 1868 that disenfranchised anyone with a felony conviction and added to the felony roster a variety of crimes they believed African Americans were likelier to be convicted of. One Republican leader said the law would keep the state from becoming niggerized. A decade later, more than 95 percent of people in Floridas convict camps were African Americans.
In the same period, at least 12 other statesa third of the Unionadopted similar felon disenfranchisement laws. Before the advent of poll taxes and literacy tests, felon voting restrictions were the first widespread set of legal disenfranchisement measures that would be imposed on African-Americans, wrote Jeff Manza, Christopher Uggen, and Angela Behrens in the American Journal of Sociology.
After the Civil War, the white Confederates who still controlled Florida had a problem: The state had been forced to accept the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments, which guaranteed equal rights for newly freed slaves, in order to rejoin the Union, and now black registered voters outnumbered white ones. White Floridians responded by adopting a constitution in 1868 that disenfranchised anyone with a felony conviction and added to the felony roster a variety of crimes they believed African Americans were likelier to be convicted of. One Republican leader said the law would keep the state from becoming niggerized. A decade later, more than 95 percent of people in Floridas convict camps were African Americans.
In the same period, at least 12 other statesa third of the Unionadopted similar felon disenfranchisement laws. Before the advent of poll taxes and literacy tests, felon voting restrictions were the first widespread set of legal disenfranchisement measures that would be imposed on African-Americans, wrote Jeff Manza, Christopher Uggen, and Angela Behrens in the American Journal of Sociology.
In 2018, Florida voters overwhelmingly passed Amendment 4, a ballot initiative intended to restore voting rights to most ex-felons who have completed their sentences. But last year, the swing states Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, signed a law requiring ex-felons to pay all fines and court fees, which can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars, before becoming eligible to votea rule voting rights activists have likened to a modern-day poll tax.
more...
https://www.motherjones.com/2020-elections/2020/07/florida-felon-disenfranchisement/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 548 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Last-Ditch Effort to Stop Florida's Century-Old Campaign of Racist Disenfranchisement (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jul 2020
OP
crickets
(25,960 posts)1. It is a modern-day poll tax. No question. K&R for visibility.
Chainfire
(17,526 posts)2. So much for the people passing an amendment
The politicians and the courts know what the people wanted and voted for. The Republicans just aren't going to have it regardless.
mitch96
(13,885 posts)3. Another DU member had an article that stated people trying to pay off the "debt" could
not even get a correct cost? Three times and three different bills...WTF? So if you pay off one debt and if it's the wrong amount you are denied.......
m