General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs Chad Wolfe Even Legally In His Position As Acting Head Of DHS?
Term of office
Once a vacancy occurs, the position is eligible to be filled by an acting officer for 210 days from the date of the vacancy, as well as any time when a nomination is pending before the Senate. If a first or second nomination is rejected by the Senate or withdrawn, it activates additional 210-day periods from the date of the rejection, but this does not apply to a third or later nomination.[2]
If an office remains vacant after 210 days after the rejection, withdrawal, or return of a second presidential appointment nomination, it remains vacant until a person is appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. In such instance, only the head of an executive agency may perform office functions until such appointment is made in the case of an office other than the office of head of an executive agency.[2]
This period is modified around the time of a presidential transition (when a new president takes office), effectively extending the 210-day limit to 300 days.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Vacancies_Reform_Act_of_1998
Chad Wolf
Assumed office November 13, 2019 Acting: February 8, 2019 November 13, 2019
President
He's been in approx. 250 days ago.
Nevilledog
(51,094 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)and why doesn't anyone seem to know it?
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)where these people are concerned
chriscan64
(1,789 posts)We're through the looking glass already.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Trumps government full of temps
Acting officials have held down 22 Cabinet and Cabinet-level jobs for a combined 2,700 days -- about 1 out of every 9 days across those jobs.
Snip
Its merely the latest top Trump administration job for which the president hasnt bothered to find a permanent replacement for long periods of time. As Trumps Cabinet has churned thanks to discord and scandal, he has increasingly opted to just go with acting officials for indefinite periods.
The result is a U.S. government that is increasingly run by people who havent been confirmed, or whom the president hasnt otherwise seen fit to make official.
To this point in his presidency, Trump has kept acting officials in charge of top agencies and departments so much that theyve accounted for 1 out of every 9 days in those positions. Across 22 Cabinet-level jobs, acting officials have served a total of 2,736 days more than seven years of combined time.
Despite being just three years into his presidency, Trump has already surpassed the number of days in which acting officials served in the Obama administration. Across Obamas eight years, there were 2,202 combined days in which acting officials served about 1 out of every 29 days. Trump has had acting officials serve more than three times as much as did Obama.
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)Link to tweet
?s=21
Curious: by my count, Wolf has been acting director of Homeland Security for 249 days. Isn't the law no more than 210 for someone in an acting capacity? What am I missing?
Here's the answer, in the Homeland Security Act of 2002. Wolf was confirmed in a different position, so could move up, and there appears to be no time limit here. Sounds iffy to me, I have to say:
muriel_volestrangler
(101,312 posts)And University of Michigan law professor Nina Mendelson, an expert on federal vacancies, says that 210-day window was violated even before Wolf was appointed, given that McAleenan served more than 210 days himself as acting secretary.
The language of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act is very clear, Mendelson said. Its 210 days, beginning on the date the vacancy occurs, so an acting secretary cannot serve legally past that time.
Mendelson noted that there is a separate statute governing the line of succession at DHS, which the Trump administration has sought to exploit to install unconfirmed hard-liners in key jobs. But it has never been tested against the Federal Vacancies Reform Act. And even setting that aside, she says that Wolfs continued service is also unconstitutional, given that the Constitution states that the president shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, such officials which Trump has made no effort to do.
...
Democrats have argued from the start that Wolfs elevation was illegal and not just because of the 210-day window. McAleenan adjusted the DHSs order of succession, but Democrats argued that McAleenan himself didnt qualify to be acting secretary under the previous line of succession, which would render his decisions illegitimate.
Brianne J. Gorod, chief counsel of the Constitutional Accountability Center, said Wolf is a prime example of this administrations unlawful use of acting officials.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/07/22/trumps-actions-portland-are-controversial-man-spearheading-them-might-be-doing-so-illegally/
What they need to do is get this in front of a judge who can then declare acts by the illegal squatter in the office void. But with appeals, that probably takes us beyond the election, or even Trump's term. Still, worth tarring Wolf with "illegally claiming to be acting secretary", and Trump not caring about security enough to nominate a secretary.