Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,093 posts)
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 12:50 AM Jul 2020

Prosecutor: No time for evidence against arrested reporter

https://apnews.com/61bdb545074a5604ca5b102bd3c5df30

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — A prosecutor who is pursuing charges against an Iowa newspaper reporter who was arrested while covering a protest in May told a judge Thursday that his office shouldn’t have to give body-camera footage and other evidence to the journalist’s lawyer because his office was too busy.

Brad Kinkade, an assistant Polk County attorney, told Judge Christopher Kemp that because Des Moines Register reporter Andrea Sahouri had only been charged with misdemeanors, the case was considered a low-priority and wasn’t worth the time needed to provide evidence the defense has requested.

“It’s a turn-and-burn docket,” Kinkade said. “They’re supposed to be handled with no delay and little cost.”

According to the Des Moines Register, Sahouri was covering a protest near a shopping mall on May 31, less than a week after George Floyd died in Minneapolis, sparking hundreds of demonstrations nationwide. Floyd, who was black, died after a white Minneapolis police officer used his knee to pin down Floyd’s neck while he gasped for air.

Police began shooting pepper spray and ordering protesters to disperse after some people were destroying property and stealing items from stores.

*snip*
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prosecutor: No time for evidence against arrested reporter (Original Post) Nevilledog Jul 2020 OP
If it's too unimportant to provide evidence, then it should be too unimportant to take to trial. TreasonousBastard Jul 2020 #1
"Hey! I heard the prosecutor is a Russian spy! But there's really no time for evidence and such. struggle4progress Jul 2020 #2
Hey, it worked in the impeachment trial... nt 2naSalit Jul 2020 #3
Bingo. mjvpi Jul 2020 #8
It's gonna say a lot about whether or not this judge is a fucking clown... RockRaven Jul 2020 #4
+1, uponit7771 Jul 2020 #10
IOWA JUDICIAL BRANCH: Guide to Criminal Court Procedure struggle4progress Jul 2020 #5
RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE struggle4progress Jul 2020 #6
Declines to dismiss charges; orders state to produce bodycam footage struggle4progress Jul 2020 #7
Good for the judge. mjvpi Jul 2020 #9
And this is why no atty should ever refer to the court as a "turn-and-burn docket." crickets Jul 2020 #11

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
2. "Hey! I heard the prosecutor is a Russian spy! But there's really no time for evidence and such.
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 12:59 AM
Jul 2020

It’s a turn-and-burn docket, and we can handle it with no delay and little cost!Let's just throw a rope over the limb of that tree in the courthouse yard!"

RockRaven

(14,966 posts)
4. It's gonna say a lot about whether or not this judge is a fucking clown...
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 01:10 AM
Jul 2020

how they rule on that.

"Your court is supposed to be a rigged-game unthinking authoritarian rubber-stamp job" is a fucking insulting argument to make to a judge. But maybe they have no integrity or dignity. We will see.

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
5. IOWA JUDICIAL BRANCH: Guide to Criminal Court Procedure
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 01:17 AM
Jul 2020

... The defendant may engage in discovery, including requesting evidence from the state and taking depositions of witnesses ... The state will present its evidence first. The defendant is not required to present any evidence because the state
bears the burden of proving the defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt ... Closing arguments must be based upon the evidence produced in trial ...

https://www.iowacourts.gov/static/media/cms/E0402_4AB079FBEE8C6.pdf

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
6. RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 01:28 AM
Jul 2020

2.14(2) Disclosure of evidence by the state upon defense motion or request.
a. Disclosure required upon request.
(1) Upon a filed pretrial request by the defendant the attorney for the state shall permit the
defendant to inspect and copy or photograph: Any relevant written or recorded statements made by
the defendant or copies thereof, within the possession, custody or control of the state, unless same
shall have been included with the minutes of evidence accompanying the indictment or information;
the substance of any oral statement made by the defendant which the state intends to offer in evidence
at the trial, including any voice recording of same; and the transcript or record of testimony of the
defendant before a grand jury, whether or not the state intends to offer same in evidence upon trial ...

2.14(5) Continuing duty to disclose. If, subsequent to compliance with an order issued pursuant
to this rule, either party discovers additional evidence, or decides to use evidence which is additional
to that originally intended for use, and such additional evidence is subject to discovery under this
rule, the party shall promptly file written notice of the existence of the additional evidence to allow
the other party to make an appropriate motion for additional discovery ...

2.14(6) Regulation of discovery ...
c. Failure to comply. If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention
of the court that a party has failed to comply with this rule or with an order issued pursuant to this
rule, the court may upon timely application order such party to permit the discovery or inspection,
grant a continuance, or prohibit the party from introducing any evidence not disclosed, or it may enter
such other order as it deems just under the circumstances ...

Rule 2.19 Trial.
2.19(1) Order of trial and arguments
2.19(1) Order of trial and arguments.
a. Order of trial. The jury having been impaneled and sworn, the trial must proceed in the
following order:
(1) Reading indictment and plea. The clerk or prosecuting attorney must read the accusation from
the indictment or the supplemental indictment, as appropriate, and state the defendant’s plea to the
jury.
(2) Statement ofstate’s evidence. The prosecuting attorney may briefly state the evidence by which
the prosecuting attorney expects to sustain the indictment.
(3) Statement of defendant’s evidence. The attorney for the defendant may then briefly state the
defense, or the attorney for the defendant may waive the making of such statement; the attorney for
the defendant may reserve the right to make such statement to a time immediately prior to presentation
of defendant’s evidence.
(4) Offer of state’s evidence. The state may then offer the evidence in support of the indictment.
(5) Offer of defendant’s evidence. The defendant or the defendant’s counsel may then offer
evidence in support of the defense.
(6) Rebutting or additional evidence. The parties may then, respectively, offer rebutting evidence
only, unless the court, for good reasons, in furtherance of justice, permits them to offer evidence upon
their original case.
b. Order of argument. After the closing of evidence the prosecution shall open the argument.
The defense shall be permitted to reply. The prosecution shall then be permitted to reply in rebuttal.
Length of argument and the number of counsel arguing shall be as limited by the court. When two or
more defendants are on trial for the same offense, they may be heard by one counsel each.

2.19(2) Advance notice of evidence supporting indictments or informations. The prosecuting
attorney, in offering trial evidence in support of an indictment, shall not be permitted to introduce
any witness the minutes of whose testimony was not presented with the indictment to the court;
in the case of informations, a witness may testify in support thereof if the witness’s identity and a
minute of the witness’s evidence has been given pursuant to these rules. However, these provisions
are subject to the following exception: Additional witnesses in support of the indictment or trial
information may be presented by the prosecuting attorney if the prosecuting attorney has given
the defendant’s attorney of record, or the defendant if the defendant has no attorney, a minute of
such witness’s evidence, as defined in rule 2.4(6)(a) or rule 2.5(3), at least ten days before the
commencement of the trial.

2.19(3) Failure to give notice. If the prosecuting attorney does not give notice to the defendant of
all prosecution witnesses (except rebuttal witnesses) at least ten days before trial, the court may order
the state to permit the discovery of such witnesses, grant a continuance, or enter such other order as it
deems just under the circumstances. It may, if it finds that no less severe remedy is adequate to protect
the defendant from undue prejudice, order the exclusion of the testimony of any such witnesses ...

2.19(8) Motion for judgment of acquittal.
a. Motion before submission to jury. The court on motion of a defendant or on its own motion shall
order the entry of judgment of acquittal of one or more offenses charged in the indictment after the
evidence on either side is closed if the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction of such offense
or offenses. If a defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence offered by
the prosecuting attorney is not granted, the defendant may offer evidence without having waived the
right to rely on such motion ...

https://www.legis.iowa.gov/docs/ACO/CourtRulesChapter/2.pdf

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
7. Declines to dismiss charges; orders state to produce bodycam footage
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 01:31 AM
Jul 2020

Tyler J. Davis, Des Moines Register
Published 5:38 p.m. CT July 21, 2020 | Updated 6:18 p.m. CT July 21, 2020

... Christopher Kemp, an associate judge in Iowa's Fifth Judicial District, on Monday responded to three requests from attorneys for Andrea Sahouri, a 24-year-old Des Moines Register reporter. He declined to dismiss the simple misdemeanor charges, as her attorneys asked him to do last month, and declined to order Polk County Attorney's Office to produce a bill of particulars, a document providing more details surrounding the state's allegations.

Kemp wrote that he expects prosecutors to have recordings and reports from those who arrested Sahouri ready to share by the next court date, which has not been scheduled.

"The state shall provide mandatory discovery … including but not limited to video, reports, audio recordings, and statements of the defendant," Kemp wrote.

Sahouri was pepper-sprayed and detained by Des Moines police on May 31 while following protests at Merle Hay Mall that turned to looting. She and her boyfriend, who accompanied her for safety reasons, were fleeing the scene when officers began using nonlethal dispersement techniques and arresting several people ...

https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2020/07/21/andrea-sahouri-reporter-arrested-covering-black-lives-matter-protest-judge-orders-bodycam-footage/5481493002/

crickets

(25,969 posts)
11. And this is why no atty should ever refer to the court as a "turn-and-burn docket."
Thu Jul 23, 2020, 10:30 AM
Jul 2020

Just because the arrogant attorney doesn't take details like evidence of wrongdoing or impartial justice seriously doesn't mean the judge will agree.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Prosecutor: No time for e...