Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCuccinelli thinks protective masks suggest violent intent
Link to tweet
?s=21
Here is a shield and a couple of gas masks from a rioter arrested in Portland. Not a sign with a slogan that someone expressing their first amendment rights might carry, but preparations for violence. Peaceful protester? I dont think so.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cuccinelli thinks protective masks suggest violent intent (Original Post)
soothsayer
Jul 2020
OP
So wearing a protective mask because Federal goons might gas you is probable cause now?
underpants
Jul 2020
#1
underpants
(195,600 posts)1. So wearing a protective mask because Federal goons might gas you is probable cause now?
Nice little circle you got going there COOCH
Karma13612
(4,945 posts)2. Chicken-egg
They are wearing these to protect them selves. Jimminy Crickets.
The Republican base really is confused; their brains have been removed and re-inserted backwards, and the electronics are fried.
This kind of logic just reinforces it!
Cha
(317,750 posts)3. Tell that to fucking KAC.
sinkingfeeling
(57,488 posts)4. Has he taken a look at what MF45's private army is wearing? How about
how some local police are armed to the teeth and covered in body armor?
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)5. I guess he spilled the stormtroopers intent
Oops. Loose lips and all...
