?!? 'Feds to appeal ruling barring them from arresting journalists' ?!? WTH

[bobbieinok]

Info found at joemygod July 24

Feds claim situations too tense, volatile, dangerous for them to take the time to distinguish journalists from ....

[Evergreen Emerald]

1. Stacking the judiciary for just this type of occassion

They are rolling out the plan they have been preparing for. The republicans, with the help of Mitch have been stacking the judiciary for years. The goal is to continue the coup.

[SWBTATTReg]

2. Oh? And the situation is too tense to make sure that they don't pick up innocent people either, or

arrest the wrong people, or in short, do their jobs properly?

[KY_EnviroGuy]

3. Delay, delay, delay to do maximum damage before the election.

Trump needs lots of video footage of jackboots gassing, beating and arresting protesters for his campaign ads.


KY.....

[Thekaspervote]

4. Let them... if it ends up at SCOTUS, even this conservative court will not go along with it

[unblock]

5. Graffiti on statues is way too important! Must suspend all rights!

[gratuitous]

6. Well, that's surprising

I have a feeling that the government's argument will boil down to "We can't be held responsible if some journalists get hit with less lethal rounds when our guys are firing randomly into the crowd."

[PatSeg]

7. Well, the mercenaries are the ones

making the situations too tense, volatile, and dangerous.

[better]

8. So if they win, guess that means it'll be open season on Faux Snooze reporters come January, huh?