Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,469 posts)
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 08:53 AM Jul 2020

Three Senate candidates you should NOT support financially...and three that you should

In 2004, I became involved in financing Democratic Senate candidates...five of them (four lost). The next cycle was 12 (plus House candidates). The next was…..

Today I give a lot of money to candidates for the House, Senate, State officials, Party Committees, etc. and as a result I get endless requests for support. I’ve met with or talked personally to 11 Senate candidates as well as DSCC Chair Cortez-Masto, and probably 50 House candidates and incumbents. To manage all these requests, I’ve built a model over the years that crunches a ranch of data elements to provide guidance on which race make sense to support...and which don’t.

Given the expansive battlefield we need to fight on (winning the Presidency, holding the House, picking up the Senate AND not forgetting about Statehouse and State Legislative contests, it’s critical to make informed decisions about where to put money (if you want to VOLUNTEER for any Democrat, be my guest). Here’s my current recommendation of what you should and should not do in the Senate.

Don’t Give Money to:

Amy McGrath (vs. Mitch McConnell)

Let’s be honest: you hate Mitch McConnell. You want to get rid of Mitch McConnell. Amy McGrath iss an appealing combat veteran running against Mitch McConnell. Why not support her?

Because, so far she has raised $47.2 M. More than McConnell. More, in fact than any other Senate candidate. She currently has $16.2 M on hand. She doesn’t need more money; she needs an electorate that’s willing to take their displeasure with McConnell and vote against him. And to be blunt, they show no sign of doing so. He was first elected 36 years ago. He has political clout, the ability to bring home goodies for his State and a substantial war chest of his own. The way you’ll get rid of him is not defeating him at the ballot box, its by taking away his Senate majority. And there are Senate candidates with much more achievable opportunities to win.


Mark Kelly (vs. Martha McSally)

(note: I know Mark; I met him from when I ended up at the private swearing in ceremony for Gabby Giffords. It’s a long story...)

In some ways, this is the reverse situation to Amy McGrath. Mark will be a great Senator and we’d love to get rid of McSally, who’s already lost a Senate race (to Kyrsten Sinema). The reason not to give to Kelly at this point is, quite honestly, that he doesn’t need the help. As of June 30, he had $23 M in the bank, and (with one outlier) has led in every poll this year. Cook, Sabato and Gonzales have all rated this as LEAN D and most analysts are already assuming this race can be banked in favor of the Democrats.


Joe Kennedy (vs. Ed Markey)

Look, I know that incumbents shouldn’t automatically expect to be nominated and and everyone has a right to run for office and all that. But so far, Kennedy and Markey have raised $17 M, enough to fully fund 2-3 competitive House races for the privilege of retaining a Democratic Senate seat in an absolutely safe Blue State. You could light the money you planned to give on fire and have just as much effect on our political future.


DO Give Money to:

Cal Cunningham (vs. Thom Tillis)

One of the things my model values is synergy: supporting a candidate who’s voters will also turn out for someone up- or down-ticket. With the continued blueing of North Carolina, it’s in reach for Joe Biden (the latest RCP average gives him a +3 average). Turning out votes for Cunningham will help both Biden and Governor Roy Cooper, as well as pick up the five seats needed to control the State Assembly.


Jon Ossoff (vs. David Perdue)

Georgia is also becoming a more competitive location for Democrats (see Stacy Abrams) and polling says this is is currently neck and neck between Trump and Biden. Jon Ossoff is currently ahead by a whisker for the Senate seat, but had to burn cash for his Primary and needs to replenish to maintain his competitiveness.


Al Gross (vs. Dan Sullivan)

Okay, this is a bit of an irrational outlier. But two recent polls show the Senate race relatively close, as well as the House At Large race between Alyse Galvin and Don Young. And the advantage of Alaska is...it’s cheap. Only one media market and campaign costs are far lower than in other States, so your dollars go further. This one’s worth something of a longshot bet.


So, spend wisely. I’ll be back next week with some House recommendations.

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Three Senate candidates you should NOT support financially...and three that you should (Original Post) brooklynite Jul 2020 OP
Appreciate you analysis. Helpful. Ninga Jul 2020 #1
I disagree!! Support Dems!!! Period. chimpymustgo Jul 2020 #4
The point of the post is: Miguelito Loveless Jul 2020 #6
We are up against voter suppression DonaldsRump Jul 2020 #7
Volunteering is a different resource Miguelito Loveless Jul 2020 #15
This sounds like solid advice to me. Laelth Jul 2020 #2
Is Massachusetts an absolutely safe blue state? DonaldsRump Jul 2020 #3
That R senator was more of an outlier than anything. bearsfootball516 Jul 2020 #5
Well Markey v Kennedy is a Dem primary. If they have enough money no need to spend it on this race. seaglass Jul 2020 #9
Yes, but if Elizabeth Warren is selected as VP and wins DonaldsRump Jul 2020 #10
True, though I don't have much hope that Warren will be selected. n/t seaglass Jul 2020 #21
Mass Dems have a huge supermajority in both Houses NewJeffCT Jul 2020 #27
I still don't understand Kennedy's reason for challenging Markey NewJeffCT Jul 2020 #26
Can't fault your thinking so far Tom Rinaldo Jul 2020 #8
What about Jaime Harrison? qwlauren35 Jul 2020 #11
That is a very good question. FM123 Jul 2020 #16
if dems spend money everywhere it force GOP to do the same, I disagree with OP beachbumbob Jul 2020 #12
Good list. I would consider adding Theresa Greenfield in Iowa and Steve Bullock ... dawg Jul 2020 #13
I give money to candidates that share my values JonLP24 Jul 2020 #14
Spot on analysis! MoonlitKnight Jul 2020 #17
Generally agree but you miss the case for Kelly grantcart Jul 2020 #18
Good post. I'm really conflicted about this, because this is like a war and I Mike 03 Jul 2020 #20
Agree and every dollar we send to AZ is going to drag GOP dollars there grantcart Jul 2020 #22
There IS such a thing as too much money... brooklynite Jul 2020 #25
Thank you. Mark Kelly is sending out solicitations and I always want to Mike 03 Jul 2020 #19
Thank you. I'm about to do anohter round of donations and this helps tinrobot Jul 2020 #23
What about Sara Gideon? qwlauren35 Jul 2020 #24

Miguelito Loveless

(4,457 posts)
6. The point of the post is:
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 09:10 AM
Jul 2020

Money is a finite resource. Some candidates REALLY don't need it. Other candidates desperately need it.

So, spend your money where it is needed.

DonaldsRump

(7,715 posts)
7. We are up against voter suppression
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 09:19 AM
Jul 2020

gerrymandering, dirty tricks, a pandemic, Trump's personal militia, vote by mail with massive challenges on the US Postal Service. ANd let's not forget about foreign interference.

We won the House back in 2018, but not the Senate. That one thing has allowed Trump to go unchecked to a large, but not total, degree (thank you House Dems!). President Joe Biden with a Re-bumble-ican majority Senate will not help.

Everything is in play, and everything is a war. Yes, money is finite, but folks should give as they see fit, and fight like hell by volunteering etc.

DonaldsRump

(7,715 posts)
3. Is Massachusetts an absolutely safe blue state?
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 09:00 AM
Jul 2020

They have an R governor and not too long ago had an R US Senator.

I don't think we can let up ANYWHERE.

bearsfootball516

(6,374 posts)
5. That R senator was more of an outlier than anything.
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 09:09 AM
Jul 2020

It was a special election, at a time that the Democratic party was facing a backlash, against a pretty weak Democratic opponent. In a way, it was kind of the Republican equivalent to Doug Jones winning in Alabama in 2017. The stars had to align perfectly for it to happen, and they did.

seaglass

(8,171 posts)
9. Well Markey v Kennedy is a Dem primary. If they have enough money no need to spend it on this race.
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 09:23 AM
Jul 2020

If you are worried about the Senate election in MA you could wait until one of them wins the primary.

I'm from MA and Scott Brown was an anomaly. Prior to his election, the last R Senator from MA was 1979.

The R Governors has a lot do with the overwhelming D state legislature and while I would opt for a Dem every time, Baker is not a Trump-Republican and he has done a somewhat decent job with coronavirus (with a few missteps).

DonaldsRump

(7,715 posts)
10. Yes, but if Elizabeth Warren is selected as VP and wins
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 09:30 AM
Jul 2020

doesn't Charlie Baker get to appoint her replacement? While I've heard he is moderate, he is a Republican. So, to the extent he selects a temporary replacement, it would probably be an R.

I don't disagree with the OP's fundamental thesis, and the OP is FAR better informed than I am. I am just simply saying folks need to give where they feel it can be of use. If I were in KY, I sure as hell would be giving contributions to Amy McGrath, etc regardless of how much of a monetary advantage she may have. McConnell needs to go, not as Majority Leader, but as a senator. He is a repulsive creature that has helped enable all of this, and he will be equally devious in a minority position. Get him out of the Senate.

He's just the first of the Rs. Let keep going!

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
27. Mass Dems have a huge supermajority in both Houses
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 12:56 PM
Jul 2020

they could change the law to require the replacement to be from the same party or to take away the governor's right to name a successor (they did that when Kerry was the Dem nominee in 2004 and Romney was governor)

But, right now, Baker would only name a short-term successor who would be a placeholder until a special election could be held.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
26. I still don't understand Kennedy's reason for challenging Markey
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 12:54 PM
Jul 2020

Markey has the most progressive voting record in the Senate and Kennedy was only a little bit more liberal than the Dem house caucus in a safe blue district.

MoonlitKnight

(1,584 posts)
17. Spot on analysis!
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 09:46 AM
Jul 2020

Especially the synergy/down ballot argument.

I would add support to those local candidates who can help boost turnout and help up ballot. The one who may not win but if you can turn out some more blue in a red area to help a statewide race or Biden to win the state.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
18. Generally agree but you miss the case for Kelly
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 09:48 AM
Jul 2020

Kelly's Senate campaign doesn't need the money but we need to keep flooding the airways w Kelly ads because

They are amongst the best ads in the country, positive, patriotic, astronaut and Kelly's coattails will:

1) secure AZ electoral college. Trump loses AZ the only paths left for Trump are ridiculous fantasy options. For that reason Trump is pouring money into AZ and it's not working.

2) help us take the State House currently 31 R 29 D

3) There is a possibility we can take AZ 6 and state Senate

A big Kelly victory lifts a lot of boats and this seat is up in 2 years and we want an intimidating win so R PACS stay away in 2022.

Lots of good options for people to invest but Kelly is a good one too.

GA should be #1 option because both seats are likely to go to the same party.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
20. Good post. I'm really conflicted about this, because this is like a war and I
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 10:03 AM
Jul 2020

sometimes wonder if there's such a thing as "too much money" in the Arizona races.

brooklynite

(94,469 posts)
25. There IS such a thing as too much money...
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 12:46 PM
Jul 2020

At a certain point, there are no more ad slots to buy...


In my call with Catherine Cortez-Masto, she agreed that Kelly didn't need help right now.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
19. Thank you. Mark Kelly is sending out solicitations and I always want to
Tue Jul 28, 2020, 10:01 AM
Jul 2020

give him money, but I've read your other posts advising against it for now.

Your advice on these matters is greatly appreciated. I'll pass this on to my mom, because she's been giving to Mark Kelly too.

If the Mark Kelly situation changes, please post about it!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Three Senate candidates y...